Showing posts with label Film production. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Film production. Show all posts

Monday, July 14, 2025

Part II – “Pvt. Ravel’s Bolero”: Anatomy of an Anti-War Film/Documentary

This is the long-delayed (begun in 2022) Part II of my 2-part blog about my WWI filmic poem/short documentary, now available to rent at, "Pvt. Ravel's Bolero". I just came across this blog in my drafts folder. Rather than wait for my film companion book (far better and detailed than either of this blogs that the book is based upon), I thought I would just put this out to the world now. The book will be far better...


The film has won over sixty national and international film awards as you can see in the graphic on this page below to get an idea. I have to say, I'm proud of this film, more so when you consider that state of health I was in when I started it, finished it, and began to send it around on the film festival circuit. I couldn't have been happier with the results and accolades I received for it. 

This blog will focus on the format and meaning of the film. While I have long been writing a film companion book for it, nearly completed, these past few years have been problematic and interrupted by covid and long covid infections. I'm doing so much better, over that now, but still healing from some of the damages, which I detailed in a book, Suffering "Long Covid". 

NOTE: I originally wrote the poem "Ravel's Bolero Flashmob" (those were popular back then still) in January of 2014 and first submitted it that month to a poetry magazine. I am currently writing this blog [in 2020] with news reports on my TV of the illegal invasion of Ukraine by the illiberally "elected" President of Russia, [now war criminal] Vladimir Putin and his propagandized Russia. 

Mostly who are unaware of what is being done in their name. Who would be horrified if they did. War, needs to stop. War mongers need to be dealt with, disallowed from their beloved past time and primary method of tyranny: death. How could this, and my upcoming film companion book, not be shaped by the experience of making a war documentary and sending it out into the world right as another war begins?

In my previous Part I to this blog, I covered how it came to by and developed. Here I wish to detail what it means as a film. I studied film since childhood, watching foreign films on PBS, fully unaware of the education I was receiving. Until, studying cinema in college as well as through readings and working on productions over the years.

For background on this film and definitions of "filmic poem", please see Part I:

"AntiWar Film - "Pvt. Ravel's Bolero" (2022) Filmic Poem & Historical Documentary - Part I"


Why do I need to do this? Well, I don't.

On the other hand, I suspect without this some may well miss so much going on in this film. The history of film/cinema and structure of poetry and the filmic poem (known by various names), isn't intimately known by many and so may well miss much of what is built into this film.

If you have read Part I, you will know how this film developed. How the poem was the basis for it and formed its structure. How through the process, the film enhanced the poem which restructured the film in an ever recycling loop, until it was completed.

To save time I will simply begin to explain the film as I see it from this point forward rather than bother about what was originally intended, or what and how things developed, and go on with how they ended up. Much of that is all covered in Part I.

I would like to mention however, that all the photos were originally black and white. I have colorized many of the photos and videos. Artist Marvin Hayes also helped with some of the more difficult photos. Simply  making many of these photos and videos clearer, took a great deal of time. The Foley work, adding audio effects also took a lot of time, as all the photos certainly and most of the videos had no sound.

I will divide up the following sections into the same sections of the film:

Title

Foreword

Intro

The Body

Outro

Credits

Post Credits

So, let's have at it, shall we?

The film opens with an onscreen warning suggesting the viewer adjust the sound levels. An audio of rain is presented as loud as the loudest part of the film will be. Why? Because Bolero begins slow and quietly builds until finally it ends in a crescendo of sound and tempo. I found for myself, this kept me having to constantly adjust the volume. Adjusting right at the beginning eliminates having to continuously adjust the sound levels.

Title

The full title of the poem this film is based on, what began this entire project is:

"Pvt. Ravel's Bolero, In "No Man's Land", Verdun, France, 30 June 1916"

"Pvt." being "Private", which was Joseph Maurice Ravel's rank in the French army. The original poem can be read here. It's original version was also published in Anthology of Evil II Vol. I (2020). For this film however, I added for clarity:

"A Poem Wrapped in WWI and the Music Of Maurice Ravel"

Foreword

The first visual we see is of an older Ravel, distinguished, befitting the world's greatest composer at that time and introduces that he is playing the piano version of his "Bolero" underscoring this first part of the film.

In using an photo of Ravel from later in life, it sets the stage for Ravel to be reflecting on his past throughout the film, with all that memory offers us in mixed imagery, in desire, in our missed opportunities, and in initially setting the stage for the forthcoming dream.

Intro

Here begins the narration, read by a voice actor Jey Martin, in French. The actors in this film have multiple characters. Atreverse member voice actor Jey speaks in a narrator's voice as a Parisian in more proper French. He later speaks in a different accent to indicate other characters such as Ravel, with his older, first half of the 1900's, Parisian accent, shooting for a slight Basque flavor, as Ravel spent many of his younger years there.

Later in the film, Atreverse member voice actor Brel Martínez shoots for a Parisian accent with more of a working class sound, to mimic Ravel's beloved truck which he named, "Adélaïde".

Underlying the on screen English text read by our narrator in French, are scenes of the war as it builds. French soldiers are seen moving to the battle field. Importantly, facing/heading to the right of screen as later scenes of Germans, show them always facing/moving to the left. This is to orient the viewer throughout the film. Some videos and photos needed to be flipped for the directions to follow this format.

These initial scenes present the beginning of trenches and soldiers populating trench and protected areas. They are standing around, curious, confused, a bit blurry at times as the "fog of war" is nearly upon them and they know it. But not nearly as bad as it soon will be. And they know that too.

NOTE: A few words on blurry or imperfect visual in the film...this film was first constructed with the best imagery possible and some wasn't very good. But it was early in the science of film and, filming in war time is seldom perfect. As the film grew in production, better imagery replaced less relevant or less quality imagery with more fitting elements as sections of film were added to, or layered over. However, while some scenes could have been replaced with better footage, at times they weren't, as it supported the poetic nature of the moment. Thus, opening scenes have a blurry imagery as do some of the ending scenes...even more so. Why? In the beginning, any soldier going INTO war is confused, frightened, disturbed. After the war, in leaving the battlefield, that is replaced with a different kind of "fog" including those elements. A pre- and a post-"fog", if you will. But along with the pain and suffering experienced, along with the disturbing, seemingly senseless loss of friends and compatriots. However in between those beginning and ending "fogs", while then is when the typically referred to "fog of war" truly exists, there is also a clarity required BY war, in order to stay alive. It is in those moments during, before and after war when there is time to think, to consider, to imagine, when the true fog invades one's thoughts and can truly effect it's burden. The "fog of war" during war is frequently an inability to assess and act appropriately, which this other kind of "fog" was what is being presented here in this film through various techniques to invoke in the viewer a sparse sense of what these soldiers experience in their Service.

Our narrator now begins to describe Ravel's entry into the war, drawing an association with author and  adventurer, Ernest Hemingway. This comparison offers the viewer a spark to later look into both Ravel and Hemingway, as it opens their association in this, as well as to consider how many others like them may have had similar experiences.

The narration goes on to set up the war and Ravel's situation within it. As well as the dangers surrounding him and the road he frequented with his "camion" (truck) "Adélaïde". 

Adélaïde, Ravel's transport into and out of danger, day in and day out. One can assume the close connection and bond he would have experienced during his repetitive travels through such terrifying environments.

The narrator's voice shifts to Ravel's voice, reading a letter he wrote to a friend regarding his situation (on screen, in a script style font supporting that this was a letter to a friend). Men in underlying footage continue preparing their trenches and safe zones among the inevitable battlefield.

The letter's content are then accentuated as a big gun fills the screen and fires, echoing the aforementioned dangers of big guns. Ravel goes on in the letter to introduce his truck, "Adélaïde", while on screen we see a painting of what "she" may very well have looked like. 

This first part of the film as Intro, is slow, acclimating the viewing through visuals and narration, into the tenuous world of WWI trench warfare. There is still time now to read what is on screen. There is still time to hear what is being said (even if it is in French). 

As in war, that is soon to change.

All through the film as an establishing point, French & allies are generally viewed moving to the right of screen and therefore toward the Germans. While the Germans as seen generally heading always to the left, toward the French lines.

It should then be noticed that the truck in the painting is headed not "to the front" (going toward the right of screen as previously established), but rather headed to left of screen, as if leaving the battlefield where the French are. 

This supports that it is a transport vehicle, loaded down, moving war materiels to the front. Then returning empty, able to travel faster with less weight, only to reload and head right back into the ever monotonous journey, from terror to horror and back again. 

From dangers to safety, only to return back into dangers. 

A photo of Pvt. Ravel appears on screen in his "camion" uniform with his large fur overcoat as cabs of these trucks are open. Enclosed vehicles are not common place yet in 1916 and war vehicles are still left open for safety purposes to be able to escape easily if need be.

This initial introductory section begins to draw to a close with a painting of an ambulance, as if headed toward the battlefield. A brief history of Maurice Ravel is given in French by our narrator with the on screen text in English. 

Years after the war, Ravel is considered the greatest composer in the world. So it is appropriate to have these readings in French. Though Ravel grew up in the Basque region, he lived his adult life in Paris. The on screen text is in English, as it has long been the language of business for the entire world.

A brief note on the paintings in the film. There are a few, but most are by American Capt. Harry Townsend, who was sent by the military to produce paintings of battlefields. An exceptional bit of foresight by those who sent him, as well as others. 

From the Smithsonian:

"...spending some time in France and Germany...Townsend came back to America, first to draw war posters, then to join the official artists and return to France in spring 1918. Much of his war work centered on new technologies like warplanes and tanks."

Then with the single on screen word: "Bolero", the Intro wraps up as we fall into the Body of the work, which begins with the opening of the orchestral piece of Ravel's Bolero. The first time it was ever publicly played and recorded.

But first... a few more visuals.

A painting of a soldier carrying a wounded comrade with the statement:
"It did not happen this way. But it could have."

Then...
"At least, in Maurice's mind."

This is as it was with perhaps every soldier, and not just Ravel. That desire to do well, to survive, but to have the courage to, if to not embarrass oneself, to unite, to one's family, to unite one's nation, and perhaps, to be lauded.

This also sets the stage for what all is to come in the film. 

That the dream is in Maurice's mind, and also the poem, for us all to see and imagine.

A painting is overlaid with text that echoes this, by our French speaking actor:

"Imagination...especially in war, is a wonderous, if mixed, blessing."

How true this is, for it is in part a buffer for all soldiers, allowing them the productive delusion they will survive. And as well being a creative mental buffer for the worst that could or would befall you in the next seconds, or days, weeks or months, or years...to come.

Our narrator shifts to the musical piece itself, offering some history about it's first appearance. And it's first performance in 1928, more than a decade after Ravel's war experiences. 


Two years later on Friday, January 10, 1930, Ravel conducted the Lamoureux Concert Association Orchestra, himself. I found a reference by Piero Coppola, who conducted and recorded Bolero, with Ravel present, on January 8, 1930, before Ravel conducted and recorded the piece I use in my film.

Piero Coppola said about this:


It was a performance not just attended by Ravel, but he had it recorded, to later be shared with the world on the personal playback devices of the time. It has been argued whether Ravel actually conducted the orchestra that day or if he was merely an attendee. And so the text and narration in the film describes the performance on screen as:

"Ravel allegedly conducted the...orchestra."

But I now know that Coppola had laid that conjecture to rest. I just hadn't uncovered that soon enough before the recording of the narration in the film. So I added an errata/addendum asterisked text on that screen in the film.

Ravel actually wrote Bolero years after WWI. Though he did write a very interesting piece that he started before the war and only finished it after. 

As stated near the end of the film:

"Interrupted by and after his war service, Ravel finally finished his piano suite "Le Tombeau de Couperin", dedicating each of its six movements to friends who had not survived the war. Which included the husband of Marguerite Long, who performed the work's premiere on April 11, 1919."

Bringing the audience further into the performance, our narrator shares the story of a woman at the end of Bolero's first performance who shouted out that Ravel was "a madman." Ravel had not heard her, but someone told him what she had said. One story says it was actually Ravel's brother who told him. Ravel's reply to what she had said was telling: 

"That lady...she understood."

The film now takes a turn. The narrator attempts to warn the viewer about what is about to happen, how the film will now begin to come at them, how they will experience it, and how similar war is to this. War has slow, quiet times. Then there are times when everything moves far too fast. One cannot grasp all that is happening. Things you need to know, you will miss. 

An old adage related to WWI goes: "War is long periods of boredom punctuated by moments of sheer terror."

In war there is no safety, even when one is..."safe". Things can come at you from all sides, in ways you least expect it. In viewing this film, it was hoped the viewer will experience some of that, even if to a minor degree. Confusion, frustration, irritation, missing things you need to know, experiencing a lack of closure, but also some pleasure, some education, and many feelings. This is a film one can replay multiple times and see things missed, the first time or two around.

It is for this reason that an outtakes reel was created.

In that reel are included scenes that did not make it into the final cut of the film. All the quick on screen text is given in one long scroll.

The poem is offered there in its entirety, with the French speaking actor reading as Adélaïde. This format gives one the opportunity to experience the poem in a more pure form, without all the distractions. 

The final narration before the Body of the film, details a unique function of war in both its negative and positive experiences. Either way it says the same: war changes you. There is another cloaked disclaimer about "war", but really it's about what is to come in the film.

And then, it begins...

Not the Body of the film... yet. Several quick flashes of French trench soldier slang terminology flashes across screen. Too fast to read. Punctuated by gunshots. This will be repeated with different definitions throughout the Body of the film. A complete scrolling list of all these definitions is also supplied in the Outtakes reel. 

The Body of the film begins, after a brief welcoming...

We see a singular title on screen in silence:

Bolero

Another quick succession of on screen gunshot accentuated terms cascades across the screen. Then a photo with sounds of a huge battlefield explosion.

And so it begins...

The Body

As Ravel's first public performance of Bolero begins playing, a huge battlefield explosion is seen and heard, blending into the beginning of the music. Then we hear the soft beginning of Bolero.

A French cavalry unit is seen sitting on their horses in some water, preparing to move again toward the front. Toward danger, and death. But hopefully also, to success, and the demise of the Germans' intentions to destroy or take over the world.

A manipulated photo of "No Man's Land" appears. There is an over exaggerated image of a soldier, in shock and pain, staring directly into the camera. It is a startling moment that fades quickly. He is not alone. 

Uncomfortable moments of a black screen force the viewer to sit in darkness, with their thoughts, waiting, as the image of No Man's Land remain unmoving on their mind's eye.

A photo of a cemetery of soldiers appears.

Another battlefield explosion appears with yet another trencher soldier's slang definition on screen.

Over black, a letter Ravel penned to a friend, describes his reasons for being in the war, as read aloud in Ravel's "voice" in French (with English text on screen).

Now that we have established a bit about Ravel, about Bolero, about WWI, and Verdun,  the poem begins as read by Maurice's companion throughout this war, his truck, "Adélaïde".

She reads the title of the poem (in common French), then begins reading, "Pvt. Ravel's Bolero". 

On screen text is in red script font in order to enhance and underscore the death and carnage of the war in the poem. As well as the intimacy of Ravel's story as told by his truck friend, his Adélaïde. "She" who kept him safe, repeatedly taking him into and away from danger.

Another soldier's slang definition appears on screen, as it will continue to do throughout the body of this film.

Multiple times throughout the poem repeats the phrase, "No Man's Land", driving home the intensity and meaning of that place where these soldiers had to stare out from, throughout their war, fearing whatever came to them, always from, "over there". Though at times too, realizing those over there were also soldiers, also men, too. Just as they were.

Multiple photos move by until a panoramic shot of all of Verdun is panned over, establishing the location in its most complete view. While soldier's slang definitions punctuate the view.

We then see a painting of soldiers hiding in tall grasses as others carry wounded. Then a photo of soldiers sitting in the muck and holes they had dug, staring out at us while the music plays on, and the poem continues.

Our poem tells of the tale of Verdun, and of Ravel, of his Adélaïde, and of the fear of trench warfare. It tells of Ravel as if he had been in the trenches as a soldier, a musician, hating the pain, death and fear along with the others. Wishing as they all did for a moment of respite from it all. From the confusion of their hatred as others hated them, either side wishing for the demise of those "Others". While recognizing they too are loved on their side, by their family's back home. If not by one another as soldiers at arms, as that "band of brothers" that only war can hammer into being.

The music, the reading of the poem and the photos continue to underscore one another. Just as they had during the production of this film, each building on and restructuring the other, until we have before us, the finished piece we now have. Drawing us in, pushing us away, educating us on a time and place we have never experienced, and would not want to had we been there.

We now back off from a photo of an immense battlefield expanse that dwarfs the small vehicles we see in it, as we pull back away, revealing just how horrific the scene is. The colors of the explosion are punctuated by the blue of the sky invading, pushing through all the smoke and debris. 

An image of Ravel in his uniform is displayed, looking clean, obviously before he entered the battlefield to deliver his supplies and war materiel, day after day.

A long moment of darkness moves the audience into thought, with only another soldier definition of bayonets on screen, as the music draws one's emotions lower and slower...until there is only darkness, for longer than one might wish for.

The horror of flame throwers brightens the screen with a description of what that meant during the war. How the Germans first developed those weapons, but the French found ways to enhance them. 

Thoughts of death by flame thrower, seeps in.

Darkness, as a flute rises and Adélaïde continues her tale as the poem continues. She tells of Ravel's imagination conjuring up how he might have played a flute in the trenches, beginning his Bolero. Beginning before he wrote it, before the war ended, drawing in his fellow soldiers, offering them some respite.

A distressed video pans a hillside, probably carved out somewhat by bombs, while soldiers labor and wait, and wait, and labor, waiting on the next nightmare. 

We zoom down into an actual photo of the trenches in Verdun from high in the sky as Adélaïde describes Ravel's nervous observation of the enemy trench line, as he plays his song.

For a moment we leave the trenches to visit the sky, as our narrator describes how aerial combat was first developed over the trenches of Verdun. Footage plays from airplanes dropping bombs upon those fields.

We return to the trenches as soldiers continue to carefully observe across No Man's Land. A photo of a lone soldier walks along a wooden walkway through a trench before it is turned into a disgusting working trench of warfare. The solitude and loneliness are there on display for all to see.

Soldiers are seen leaving the trenches on a sortie, across No Man's Land.

Footage of bombs exploding in the fields, as Adélaïde continues a story of another soldier standing up, and joining Ravel's playing, as his music continues, as others join them both.

These soldiers of Ravel's imagination in the poem bravely play on with Ravel's music, becoming their music, standing fearless, as a footage continues to play of soldiers crawling forward across, No Man's Land. 

As the poem tells of the music swelling, we see a scene of soldiers standing and running across No Man's Land.

Over another black screen, more soldiers stand with Ravel and play, as we can see them, in our mind, as Ravel might have seen them. Over the black screen, dead rise and play along with Ravel and his comrades, as the fantasy takes a turn into the fantastical and the even more morbid. 

We take a moment now to consider a rather horrific photo taken from the narrative film shot during this war, that of "J'accuse" (1919), by director Abel Gance. There is more about that in the Outtakes reel. 

We move now into a subplot of the poem of one soldier in the trenches who does not buy into Ravel's fantasy, his truce of them all playing music together, of both sides, of friends with enemies in a moment of shared humanity and of compassion. This soldier is the one of us who hates, who sees the moment as another opportunity to kill. As a free shot at the "enemy".

It is a flip to what happened in 1914 with the first soldier killed after the infamous WWI "Christmas truce". 

From the article:

"Accounts suggest that men sang carols and in some cases left their trenches and met in No Man's Land to exchange gifts. There are even claims that a game of football was played...Everyone started to get up and wander over this killing ground. When they went up they started to shake each others hand and they started to exchange gifts."

At some point a gun accidentally discharged on the British side during the truce, harming no one. But a German on the other side mistook it, fire back and killing, as it is believed, 20 year old Scottish rifleman, Walter Sinclair Smith, with the 5th Cameronians Scottish Rifles. 

And so Smith was the first to be killed, ending the truce.

We take a moment then for a photo of French soldiers in a taken German trench and another photo of French soldiers sharing food in their trench, in two juxtaposed slices of time of aggression and peace, attack and sustenance.

Footage plays of a big gun firing repeatedly at the German lines, as the poem tells of a German soldier who stands, curious about the music drifting over from the French lines, from those enemy lines, and he climbs toward the lovely music... as an "enemy" takes aim. But is it this German soldier taking aim, another, or the French soldier taking aim at him? 

Just who exactly IS the enemy here? It evokes the beliefs in every war, of both sides asking their version of God, to protect them as the righteous ones to defeat their enemies. Enemies of theirs and therefore, of God. The audacity of humankind in its purest form.

The big gun continues firing as the music plays diminutively and Adélaïde holds her silence, for the moment.

The music changes as the big gun stops firing and we switch to a view of the German line watching over No Man's Land. Adélaïde talks now about the enemy and just who the enemy IS in war?

In the poem, in the moment those in the French line, see their comrade aiming to kill during such a moment as music and humanity are building. They are horrified at this, at themselves for understanding him. 

There is a mix among those in the trench of those who agree with the marksman, and yet, feel something else, and wonder at how they find his action suddenly so very disconcerting, even horrible. They are confused. They need leadership. If not from within, then from without

Finally, an officer takes action. He smacks the marksman in the head, giving that direction so desired by his men. Bringing about a moral compass for the moment, for all to see. He angers the soldier for ruining his shot. His black mood even more pronounced. 

But in looking at his officer, transferring his anger from enemy soldier to fellow officer, he too is now conflicted. In looking at the accusing eyes of his comrades, he finally realizes his chosen position, laid bare there before them all, his humiliation and fear overtaking him. That "fog", that conundrum of war, enshrouding him.

We take a moment as blackness covers the screen until we see a photo of a trench rat hunter and his many catches. We are reminded of the misery of living in a trench during a war. 

Only to then see a photo of a German "Dead Man's Hill", death and skeletons of soldiers never buried lying haphazardly about.

Again, a moment of darkness on screen until Adélaïde speaks again. We see s single man in a field of No Man's Land. 

Is it Ravel? We revisit the marksman's anger upon his officer for his missed shot, such an easy shot it could have been! But his officer stares at him in utter and total anger for stealing their moment of humanity from them all. 

A brief pause as we see a lone figure on No Man's Land, near a trench full of his dead. The more we look, the more we see.

We now see a photo from the other side. Germans filming the French trench lines. It is very blue, so much different than the brownish tints so typically seen in these photos. They seem almost relaxed, a heavy juxtaposition to where we are in the poem and the film.

The French marksman sees the anger among his fellow soldiers, for his attempt to destroy their moment, when they were all so happy to share, the music, the comradery, a magic few moments shattered. 

He realizes even better now what he had been about to do and what he had fully missed out on. He lays down his gun. As he relinquishes his gun he relinquishes his anger. We jump to a video of German soldiers rushing out of their trench to the enemy. 

No matter if you take your mind off the reality of war, or share a moment of good feelings. War remains. Always. And continues.

We cut to yet another photo of German soldiers observing the French lines. Less blue now, with red, almost brown in it, returning us to the battlefield horrors. In war, one is always under observation.

We cut to an explosions in black and white. Then, to a photo of a field ambulance, reminding us of the results of inattention in war. Or of taking a chance on not being in fighting mode at any and all times.

We move into the dance of bombs in a battlefield scene. We jump for a moment to a serene scene of camouflaged train rails. Then back to the dance of bombs as the music continues rising in tempo.

A war poster for the war effort is shown. A woman flies over the battlefield. It suggests we invest money into the war effort. Then, to footage of medics collecting another wounded soldier on the battlefield. Another shot of a war poster. Then footage of observers watching in a field as a smoke grenade explodes before them. 

Adélaïde describes how the soldiers in the trench watch Ravel and the men, playing. Even the dead. Yet it has evoked a lightness in them all. Even in the German line.

Footage of flame throwers and their mechanized death in this new form of warfare, is a brief reminder that is always present.

Another big gun fires directly at us, as audience. Adélaïde describes how the music is curing the men's disease of war. How, if only momentarily, all are reminded of their humanity and considerations again of friend and foe. Of how it can become obscured in war. Of how our fellow soldiers are our friends, if not brothers, through these many forged trials of fear and death, and survival.

Another momentary break as civilians are seen moving to the left from the war area away to safety. Reminding us of their suffering, too. An overlay of a postcard reminds us of how death comes in war from all angles, from all sides, and from above us. There is little escape.

After an image of soldiers eating in a bomb crater, we see footage of a massive ammo dump, overlaid with several musical weapons of WWI, built and played by soldiers in the trenches.

A scene of a massive dump of expended big gun shells gives us an idea of just how much ammo was discharged during this, or any war. Our narrator makes this clear in detailing just how much was fired off during WWI, as we continue panning over the footage of the massive ammo dump.

Footage plays of fresh soldiers in a trainyard waving to a packed train of ever more fresh soldiers. All headed to the front among cheers and waving of hands and hats as the tempo of the music continues to rise. We cannot but think of how these men have no idea of the death and mayhem they are about to be inserted into, with little or no escape.

A pair of war posters are seen, asking for donations of money to the war effort.

Cheerfully, a group of Red Cross march by camera on the way to the front. Then a moment of extended blackness, until...we see footage of a German soldier walking toward the camera... as he is blown to dust.

A machine gun fires. Then we see what is being fired at, Germans advancing as they fall and as the music continues to rise.

We return to the previous lone German soldier, just before he is blown to bits, as he is blown up again and yet, not as it had just missed him after all, and he continues approaching carrying a bucket while more bombs barely miss him.

In a new scene at night, soldiers move away into the distance where just over the horizon, massive explosions light up frame, one after another, their sounds so far away they are delayed, out of synch with the visuals. We see the light of the explosions first, then belated, we hear their terrifying retorts.

The music continues rising and we are left in utter blackness, but only for the moment.

The final war poster is displayed and then footage is seen as the "Black Butchers" enter the frame. These are the armillary soldiers. They operate their big gun, loading and raising it into position. The utter devastation of no man's land is seen all about and in the distance. Then the gun fires, stunning reality and finally, it returns downward to its hidden, resting position.

We are now momentarily visited, among the blackness of the screen, with a faint image of "Death incarnate", ever present in war, as a definition appears on screen of "Des totos", the ever present lice and fleas that those in the trenches (and others) had to live with, day in and day out, all through interminable long days and long nights.

The screen goes black again and we are left only with our thoughts, as the music momentarily diminishes in scale and in tempo.

Until it picks up again, as we take an aside from the poem. Footage of a British tank approaching. Our narrator is silent now, as this is about a British oriented weapon rather than a French or more global, allied one.

German soldiers are seen experiencing the utter uselessness of their personal weaponry against this weapon of mass destruction. A German water cooled machine gun fires, as its bullets simply bounce off of the armored vehicle.

From, "The Vickers Blog: Germany":

"The German use of the Vickers MG [originally, .50 caliber] was initially restricted to the single gun purchased above, probably for trials use. However, it's known that they use captured weapons extensively in the Great War. They were converted to fire the German 7.92mm ammunition and were marked with an 'S' to indicate such conversion."

Mechanized warfare had truly begun. The weight of a tank as is seen, as it crushes the entrance to a German tunnel beneath it. Tanks used not only for protection of those driving and firing from it, but also that of troops following it in a coordinated, "force multiplied" use of mechanized warfare.

As the tank rolls on unaffected by the explosions all around it, words one screen of French soldier Ernest Karganoff describe life in trench warfare, in shaky, difficult to read text. As if as one were trying to read or hear it read within the battlefield where so many things go by too quickly, while trying to maintain sensibility among all the random death and destruction. The words are too quickly bombed off the screen, as the narration ends and a tank continues its roll.

Again text is seen on screen, shaky, almost as if too frightened to display, as our narrator tries once again to read during a battlefield scene. A static image of a war dog is displayed wearing a gas mask, the text describing how many animals were used in the war until, again...text and narration are bombed out of our existence.

This easily missed information is all contained in an Outtakes reel where one has the time and stability to absorb all the information under less stressful terms.

The text on screen blends into a pool of blood on the battlefield as a tank rolls forward as if out of the pool of soldiers' blood. Before the text vanishes, the scene shifts to a tank rolling at us out of the mist from the fog of war.

German soldiers flee as one of them, seeing the tank nearly on top of them, screams, his arms thrown into the air in terror, as they all run from the tank attack. The experience of these soldiers being faced for the first time, not with foot soldiers, not with cavalry, the previously most fearful form of "mechanized" warfare, but with actual mechanized machines of war, which must have been utterly terrifying. 

A German soldier leaps into a fortified trench to escape a tank as it rolls over and we assume, crushes what formerly would have been a safe escape.

The tank sequence ends and small explosions erupt on the bare battlefield. These are not bombs, not smoke grenades, but a gas attack which the on screen text and narration describes and details in all its horrifying detail.


The camera shifts from the open field of gas attacks (see graphic above) to a fox hole with soldiers wearing gasmasks. The scene is yellowish, as it would have been during a gas attack, with its yellowish fog moving into the fox hole.

Some masks were ill-fitting, or soldiers may have been too slow to don them during attacks. The frightening potential that could follow those issues is clearly seen, as one soldier tries to aid his dying fellow soldier, screaming in pain and horror as his respiratory system liquifies.

We return to the dance of bombs in the battlefield, wrapping up the sequence regarding gas and chemical warfare with a disturbing poem by British Soldier, Wilfred Owen.

We shift to a greater dance of bombs on a battlefield as we return to the main poem... which brings us back to where the music is, both in the poem and in Ravel's "No Man's Land", as soldiers from both sides, soldiers both alive and dead, are playing to the end.

We return to our soldiers in the fox hole, moments before the dying soldier falls, to see what led up to that scene of a gas attack, as both poem and music culminate in the finale of...Bolero. 

And the soldier fatally falls from the attack at the exact moment of the music's end.

Outro

Thus ends the body of the film and the end of the orchestral music, beginning our... "Outro".

Adélaïde, states the obvious: 'It is over!"

And yet, it is only the music that is over. What now do these soldiers, healed and yet broken from their musical revelry among fellow combatants, friends and enemies. Once enemies and yet enemies, again? Or not? A tense, frustrating moment to suddenly be found in the most feared location in the war and on earth, between two enemy lines.

The dead, once again are dead. The living, looking all about, slowly return to reality, to their lines, to being again...enemies.

Where now has gone that feeling of humanity? Why does their feelings of war, of enemies, have to return?

The scene shifts to a blurry, fog based forest. Trees sparse and damaged. The film almost floats as the bucolic scene lifts and drops as if in a dream... and life for the soldiers returns to, normal? What is, "normal"?

Scenes of soldiers in trenches again, staring out through No Man's Land, at their enemy retreating, no doubt to their own trenches. Adélaïde describes these soldier's feelings. How for a time they feel almost normal, feeling their humanity, so foreign now to them. This humanness. While now, they must return, mentally, spiritually, physically... back into a war none of them wants. 

Bored soldiers mill about in an open trench as Adélaïde continues the poem telling how Ravel's soldiers hung onto their unfamiliar feelings, now quickly escaping their grasp, as they begin to applaud. First one, then more, until finally they all enter into a full crescendo of applause.

In the poem, silence enshrouds Pvt. Ravel in his own realization that what just happened wasn't really about him at all. Rather it was about all those soldiers, on both sides, who had carried out what he was truly only a catalyst to.

While initially  in the applause, Ravel felt pride in their appreciation for his music, for the experience, he quickly realizes it was not for him. Not at all. But was for them all, for those previous few moments of their return to being human beings once again. 

The music returns to the initial Bolero piano music (played by Ravel) from the opening of the film as they all return to their places...physically, mentally, recognizing their places in this world. In this war, and through that temporary and pleasant "fog", so very different from their familiar and usual "fog of war", returning once again back into their "gutters", both of trench warfare and of their mental state of being.

Again we see foggy forests in the distance, and the floating feeling of the film, as we must consider the "forest for the trees" and where these men are for the moment, lost between reality and their mental state.

We return to having distance from the scene, from the poem, remembering this was all about Ravel and his Bolero. We return to the photo of a lone soldier amid a muddy field, as a photo of Ravel appears in his Camion uniform, staring directly at us, along with video of his memory of wishing to be a pilot, far about the battlefields.

We shift back to the foggy forests, to Ravel's mind. Back to his battle to see what he had just done in this fantasy in it being not for him at all, as it began for these soldiers, for his comrades, and for his enemies. All of them belonging not just to their tribes of Germans or opposing allies...but as human beings.

Ravel begins to realize how alone he is. How alone they all are, individually. And how together they all are in their separate ways. How perhaps he shouldn't have been enjoying it all quite so much. But to be fair, humans do need a reprieve from horror and the ever present watchful eye...of Death.

Pulling back again we see the soldiers in their trenches, still watching their enemies. Ever watchful as they have to be. Assuming on the other side, their "enemies" are doing the quite same.

Again we see those foggy forests in the distance as Adélaïde tells us Ravel returns alone to his line, to his own side's trench, until he back, secure in it as he realizes, as do they all, what is, and also what could be, and what one day will be. 

This war will not after all last, as it seems now to be, forever.

Two very blurry soldiers walk toward us as Adélaïde tells us that all is returning to normal, as the fear, blood dripping all about, death and destruction still prevalent, returns us to the reality of the soldiers on whichever side they exist. 

Death and terror...have returned. 

We cannot shake the feeling from these soldier's movement toward us, that they seem somehow lighter, maybe...happier? They disappear into our lens as the screen fades to black, leaving us for a few moments alone. with only our thoughts.

Still blurry from the "fog of war", we see soldiers, officers exit a cave, walking toward us, heading to left of screen as if leaving the war (is it over?). Adélaïde brings the poem to its conclusion, and our film to its end.

As in the beginning when the titles appeared white, then turned red, they are now red, returning to white, returning us to our own reality and as our narrator informs us of Ravel's life after the war. And tells us a bit of what Ravel's contemporaries thought of him, and then what he did after the war. He finished his piece dedicated to five of his friends who did not survive the war, as that music plays under the narrator's story.

The music shifts to a more gentle piece as we hear how Ravel's career and his life ended. We see where he was laid to rest. It is also noted that because of Ravel's views on his works, in how all should be able to hear them, he believed in the concept of recordings, so others could hear great works. Because of that belief, we were able to play here, in this film, Ravel's original works. Including his own first public performance of Bolero, in one he not only attended, but also conducted. Though was up for contention by some, after the film was finished, it was uncovered that Ravel did indeed conduct this performance.

While I could have played a more perfect piece of music, I diligently strove to use all the original film, photos, prints, posters and music as possible, to be, even if not perfection, even if not as beautiful as it all could be, to be as original as possible. For us to be there, with Ravel, and with his fellow soldiers...on both sides. To see, hear, to expeirence the ugliness and at times, the beauty one can find in war.

And so thus ends our film of, "Pvt. Ravel's Bolero".

Credits

We go now into the credits next to footage of WWI settling on right of screen. The first thing mentioned in the credits is about the Outtakes reel, available for the difficult to read text, including extras not included, as well as the entire poem in one piece with narration by "Adélaïde", so it can be experienced without all the necessary distractions included in the film.

Post Credits

After the credits the two voice actors say their goodbyes in forms familiar to those in the days past of WWI.

Finally, a list of all wars on earth scrolls by. WWI is in all caps as it scrolls by. When WWII appears after a break with it's atomic ending, the explosion at Hiroshima from US archives underlies the scrolling text. It then continues with the wars AFTER WWII and up to the present illegal invasion by Russian Pres. Vladimir Putin against Ukraine, and is labeled so appropriately and reasonably as: "Putin's Folly". 

The film then ends with one final quote:


For some, following the film will be the Outtakes reel. If it is not a part of the main film, it is available separately.

FYI, the film companion book will obviously (and eventually...actually, already) be quite more comprehensive than this blog.

Either way thus ends (finally) this two-part blog on, "Pvt. Ravel's Bolero". 



Sunday, July 7, 2024

Walkabout Thoughts #97b - Screenplays

 Nope, didn't walk again today. Feeling better after the air cleared yesterday. 

The third day of adding to my walks with strength training, some weights, and sit-ups, and I'm a bit sore but less than yesterday, and feeling pretty great from it. Looking forward to more.

First off I'd just like to mention something. I've been watching Orlando Bloom: To The Edge show. 

"Synopsis: Actor and adventure enthusiast Orlando Bloom embarks on a physical, mental and spiritual journey of self-discovery as he undertakes three extreme sports -- wingsuiting, free diving and rock climbing -- to push himself to the edge of what is possible. With family, friends and his spiritual Buddhist practice guiding the way, Orlando is trained by experts who help him overcome obstacles, face his fears, and discover valuable lessons about himself."


I lean Buddhist. I've been a skydiver, & parachute rigger in the USAF, I've done rope work and climbed cliffs, more tactical than technical but some technical was involved in search & rescue. He takes a week to learn and achieve more than is reasonable in skydiving, free diving, and technical climbing. It's an interesting show and experience and reminds me of how it was doing those things for the first time and the difficulties mental and physical. And to see him really struggling but never giving up. You don't quit. 

You do more than you know you can, and then you do it. You may know you can't do it, but you keep pushing and then..you've done it. Life is good. Unless you die, or worse, don't and are just broken. I've been lucky, with good reflexes, and learned from the best. So does Orlando. He's been lucky, with good reflexes and a normal for him, intense workout. But here he's pushing himself beyond his limits (and mine from my past) and in his final episode with climbing, it makes for a good final episode. It's pretty impressive and somehow cathartic. 

And nostalgic...

Moving on. I received a win today for my screenplay, "The Teenage Bodyguard", a True Crime/Drama. My 13th international award for this screenplay.


That led me to update this award on my IMDb page (they suggested that, so nice of the thought I would look into it if it's an award IMDb allows). Looking at three of my hosts on my screenplays and updating all the loglines and synopses on all of them. Took me all day. Kind of (boring and long) fun and cathartic. Why cathartic?

This all turned into an interesting situation.

See, IMDb is basically, the "Internet Movie Database". Movie. Not screenplays.

When I won my first few awards for a screenplay, which I think was THIS one, I didn't realize I could put it on IMDb. When I realized that I tried to add it to my profile there.

They refused. I was confused.

The festival said, "We're IMDb Award certified (or whatever) and you can add your award there."

But they would never let me add a screenplay. I tried until frustrated some years ago, I gave up.

But today was different. It said on IMDb when I was adding the award (and tried to add a screenplay that didn't exist), that I should add it using the add reform. I've used that many times for my films. Frustrating, and miserable the first few times but a breeze once you're used to it. Just not for screenplays. Apparently.


Anyway, I pushed through today and went around and around and kept trying until finally, it clicked...and went through. Which only means I got it into the queue until they could examine it and, deny it, or accept it. This has taken weeks before. In recent years it's been faster though.

Within about an hour it was approved!

Cool. 

But that got me to thinking. I updated my logline and synopsis for it. But then I had to do it elsewhere too for compatibility Then I should probably update my other scripts and screenplays.

That took all day. I had to update the new IMDb page to add all the awards that IDMb would accept. I had to update the synopsis on IMDb. I needed to update that on Script Revolution and Film Freeway (and a counterpart of theirs, WFCN), and I just got a notification from MovieBytes' WinningScripts to update or lose the screenplay's accessibility. Probably should do the BlackList, too.

WinningScript may not seem like much, or much now, but that little free site has led me to some very interesting connections and networking. From that site, I got a job to do an adaptation of an author's novel to screenplay format. Then a second author. Also to the publisher of my first two books. 

You never know where your efforts will pay off and it certainly hasn't been to the efforts that charged the most or cost me the most money. Not that all of those are a waste of time. But you have to be smart and manage your money, time, resources, and efforts.

On that note, I’ll bid you adieu...and leave you with that.
It’s nowhere near noon time or lunch. It's 8:20PM Saturday night.

Cheers! Sláinte!

Monday, July 1, 2024

Walkabout Thoughts #94

Thoughts in Streams of Consciousness, Rough & Ready, and Lightly Edited from an Award-Winning Filmmaker/Author you’ve never heard of while walking off Reality and hopefully the last half-life vestiges of Long Covid while listening to podcasts.
Walking Day is Saturday, June 29, 2024.


First up...Happy JULY! My eBooks will be promoted/discounted on @Smashwords for the month of July as part of their Annual Summer Sale! Be sure to follow me for more updates and links to the promotion for my books and many more!

I just realized something. When I was a kid reading comic books I loved the grab bag from Johnson Smith company ads where I got my gimmicks and magic tricks and gags that my older sister hated so much.I refuse now to spend money on a grab bag of anything. But that's what my walkabout thoughts are. Sharing my walking around in my mind thoughts from while I'm walking about thinking. Wel, it is what it is...Welcome to SchizoLand.

Weather for the day… nice day, starting out, 64° with a no wind and mostly blue sky 75° back at home, 75° .

Podcast is The Playlist about the Apple+ show Dark Matter from the novel. Love this show. It takes physics as we understand it and shows you how bad it could get.
'Dark Matter’: Joel Edgerton and Showrunner Blake Crouch Dive into Finale Spoilers, Season 2, ‘Star Wars’ & More [Bingeworthy Podcast]

Which is what I did in my first published dystopian sci-fi story back in 1990 in a horror quarterly magazine. “In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear “ is a story I wrote back in 1980 about a genius who turns himself into a computer.

I forgot the history of this story till just now. I blasted this out on social media today because I saw Ray Kurzweil being interviewed about the AI singularity and how he viewed things coming.

My short story: I had been through the Air Force. I had yet to get my university degree or even think about getting one.

When I got out of the Air Force, I got a divorce, and couldn’t seem to get a good job. After all the responsibility and I guess. prestige I had in the USAF, I was surprised I couldn’t even seem to get a job at McDonald’s (no I didn't apply there). I did interview with RadioShack. 

I had the bad luck of their district manager being there that day. I could tell from the get-go he didn’t like me. People usually do, so I couldn't figure out what the problem was. The manager of the store was also there and I was reading something from his looks on his face in listening to the interview. Embarrassment? Irritation at the District Manager who would say some things and the store manager would kind of wince.

As it turned out, he made it clear he didn’t like ex-military and thought they were all thieves and lowlifes. Though I would’ve been a very good employee. I was long into RadioShack. But I couldn’t seem to find a decent job at the level I should’ve been able to get one. Considering what I did in the Air Force. I was parachute shop supervisor responsible for the lives of certainly anyone who jumped chutes. I packed the parachutes the Pararescue guys, Known as the PJs, jumped, daily out of helicopters. I was responsible for over $1 million in equipment, which back then was quite a bit.

Finally, I decided on what are my dream jobs were since childhood, of a sort, and had started to apply for those thinking, what do I have to lose? Radio Shack seemed like a no brainer. 

I had been going to the unemployment office and finally did get hired at Colortyme TV and Furniture Rental. I told them upfront I will not do repossessions and they SAID, "No problem. Show up tomorrow."

When I got there the next day, they said I would be doing repossessions. I said no, I made it clear I wouldn't do that. But they just smiled and said, "If you refuse this job now, no unemployment benefits and we will go against you for that with the unemployment office." Outside of questionable ethics, they were actually pretty nice guys. Just not if you rented from them.

They had a scam of letting you fall behind on payment, if by one day we picked up what you were renting, were told to tell the customer that it wasn't a problem, just come into the store tomorrow and sign a document and we'll bring it all back. What we didn't tell them was, didn't give them time to right then pay it off, call someone or something, was that once we picked stuff up, their contract started from scratch. Some people had only a month left to pay after a couple of years, but they then started it all over again. Keeping them on the hook. Which to me was a rip-off. I couldn't do it.

I finally just quit when I had picked up a TV from a very nice black couple with two of the cutest kids. Seemingly middle-class family. Just got a little behind. I felt I was lying to them the whole time I was taking their 8' console stereo TV console. The kids had been watching cartoons and they were crushed and it broke my heart. 

The week before that I had tried to repo a tv and a guy's wife answered the door. She was pretty attractive wearing a tank top. We were a few blocks north from the north end of McChord AFB runway in a run-down area of low-cost single-family rentals. 

She told me her husband wasn't home and had told her not to talk to anyone about the TV. She said he also told her to tell anyone trying to take it that he has a gun.

This job wasn't worth my life. 

Not that it was something that would typically stop me, ever. Fuck him. I have a gun, too. Probably knew how to use it a lot better than he did. Big deal. But doing a job like this? Being threatened over what I didn't even want to be doing anyway? No.

Then there was that family with the cute kids...during CHRISTMAS time? No, no, no. 

I quit the next day. To be fair about the gun guy? The store manager told me that wasn't any of my concern. It was his job and he'd handled it. Go out there with a Sheriff's Deputy the next day. Whatever.

I went to the unemployment office and they said I was refused compensation to carry me over to another job. I appealed and the guys from the store I was working at on 6th Avenue in Tacoma Washington showed up. Three of them for some reason. They thought it was a lark and were smiling. Screwing the guy who didn't want to be part of their crew. They did indeed make sure I didn’t get any unemployment compensation in quitting over their questionable issues of ethics.

I ended up losing my 1975 very clean, very fast 350 Camaro RS I had configured for doing 140 MPH when I spent weekends with my wife home in Tacoma until Sunday when we'd return so I could get to work on Monday at Fairchild AFB. I could take that 4 1/2 hour drive and turn it into 3 1/2 hours. When that car hit 100MPH, it settled down and became an entirely different car. 

Couple of times I got a ticket on the other side of the river going uphill on some great winding curves that were great fun to drive in a Rally Sport Camaro. Both times that happened I got chewed out by a cop for doing 70+. I had to bite my tongue, considering how fast and how long I'd just been going on a straightaway (only with no other traffic).

My belief had always been as it was I believe on stretches of the German Autobahn, one should have good equipment to drive and the skills to handle whatever speed you choose, and not drive in a reckless fashion. 

Anyway, being after quitting my job, losing my car, I had no bills. But, I ended up living in the shed in the back of my brother's house. I fixed it up, set up the wood stove he had in there, and spent the winter there. He changed me by cutting up all the wood so both the main house and my loft would have heat. He worked construction and would bring random wood and cut-up trees home that he had scavenged. 

It was a good deal and for a while on food stamps, I had a small fridge, my stereo amp and speakers, I took some time to post-military service decompress. Those would good times. Some weed may or may not have been shared there at any hour reasonable or unreasonable when friends dropped by off the alley.

The friends who would come over were my girlfriend's friends. We'd sit around and get stoned. Then one day three of them were over and I jokingly said that I could write anything, make any storyline premise work. Which wasn’t quite true but soft of and I was kind of kidding. Years later after getting my university degree and more so after being a senior tech writer, I really was able to. I also tried to write everything I could in all formats and disciplines. The more you stretch your capabilities the better you are at your chosen or favored ones.

They had laughed at me. So, I said, "OK wise guys, come up with a story you think is impossible to write and I’ll write it." They came up with a "guy turns himself into a computer chip." And so I wrote a story that later got titled, "In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear". Titling it as a homage to Isaac Asimov‘s first autobiography “In Memory Yet Green“. An author who was one of my childhood writing heroes.

They used to give me a hard time about stories. I would write because I never gave them an ending. They complained about it. "We love your stories, but a write a damn ending!"

Fair enough.

That didn’t really happen until after my second-degree when I graduated from Western Washington University. I spent the 1980s sending off my “Ahriman” screenplay about a prince/profit from another planet who gets accidentally sucked onto Earth by our scientists. I also sent all of my short stories off in a round-robin of submissions that led nowhere. I did get to correspond with Clive Barker in London and met him a few times, which was fun.

Finally, in 1990 an East Coast horror quarterly magazine offered to publish my story. If I cut 1500 words. That freaked me out. My wife at the time suggested I look in the story for a block of 1500 words, just to see if either there was a cuttable block, or the publisher was trying to see if I was smart enough to figure out what passage of text he was asking to be cut.

Oddly enough I found nearly an exactly 1500 word section and cut it. It wasn't necessary to the story but added flavor to it. I submitted the story to him and it was published. When I republished that story myself as an e-book in 2012, a little later as an audiobook, I put that 1500 block back in. It wasn't necessary to the story, but it was kind of a fun scene. It did offer some more information about how the famous surgeon and friend was experiencing what was happening.

The story is about a world-famous surgeon whose son disappears in the Amazon. His son had a childhood best friend who asks for help saying he needs life-saving surgery, on his brain. The surgeon helps the guy. It turns out the guy is turning himself into a crystaline computer chip.

With the help completed, the son's friend goes online, gathers advocates, sycophants, and protectors around him, and eventually eases the surgeon out. The problem is the guy was always a little mentally off, as geniuses can be. To fund his research and existence he starts to take on projects.

He does some adverts for TV that are so good, over a brief period, a few and then all American businesses hand him their advertising campaigns.

What happens when a mental defect and narcissist is handed leadership of a country? And the guy basically controls America’s minds. Because for one person to control all media and advertising they would become positioned to re-orient how America thinks.

This effort takes very little of this guy’s processing power and soon most of the world wants him to do their advertising. Because what he produces is so perfect and beautiful and moving. However, Canada and Mexico both start distancing themselves from America. Because they're so close and are better positioned to see what’s actually going on.

It wasn’t until Trump became president that I started to see the similarity between this story, Donald Trump, his authoritarianism, and his narcissistic and pathological lying.

I believe the story ends the only way it could. And I hope that’s not true for America. We may find out in this election because if Trump becomes POTUS again, all bets are off on maintaining democracy in America or in the West. Because Russia and the East have been pushing us in that direction and have been for decades.

Back in the 1990s, oddly enough, the Republican party picked up on this and started going in this direction. Authoritarianism has been creeping back, growing in the democratic West, and needs it to be stopped. ASAP.

Basically how you can tell if anyone’s playing into that is if they support Putin or are against aid to Ukraine. It’s gotten that simplified. Also if you support Donald Trump, then you’re obviously supporting the demise of Western democracy. He has tried to distance us from NATO and other international alliances that are for the betterment of all humankind. You hear from them Christian nationalist speaking points and isolationism

We can change this. We just all need to wake up. Including all of those against Trump. Because even a lot of them aren’t seeing what’s been going on.

This is not a conspiracy theory. That’s not how I came into this information or my understanding of what’s been happening. I had been studying something else completely, when the comparison became clear.

As I’ve said many times before, I didn’t come into this by being a Democrat. Most of my life I was an Independent. I voted for the best candidate of any party. I came into all this by studying the Soviet Union and its expertise in disinformation. Suddenly I'm seeing it in the 1990s coming out of the Republican Party. I thought it had to be something Russian, but it was coming out of the Republican Party who was utilizing those techniques... against our own Americans. 

Because in using Russian techniques, they found themselves rising in power. Do not think Russia did not notice this. It's where their expertise really lies. Observing, assimilating, weaponizing, feeding back into the opposition system, applying pressure in the right few places, hidden from sight, magnifying using useful idiots and cutouts, then sitting back and cheaply reaping the benefits. Republicans loved that concept. 

It’s a heady mix.

Getting back to the podcast, the guy who wrote the novel Dark Matter, Blake Crouch, I’m really enjoying his show based on it. Heavy on physics, but that’s something my son and I communicate back-and-forth about all the time.

This author is apparently written several books that have been made in the shows I have watched, never knowing where they came from. Like Wayward Pines.

Starting my 2nd mile… The sun is kind of warm, but not too bad yet.

Blake Crouch, and then actor Joel Edgerton are interviewed on the podcast. I've enjoyed Joel's projects. 

I've been a consumer of horror books, films, and shows for decades, since the early 1960s? I believe it was one night in 1959, in Philly, I got up at about midnight and my mom let me watch a late-night vampire movie with her in her bed. Being up at a time I never was allowed up at. Hanging with mom. Watching a scary movie in the dark? Life, is good..

I enjoyed that so much that I begged her to wake me every time she watched a late-night horror film. Being a good mother, she tried to dissemble over that. She offered to try flashing a flashlight in my eyes while I was sleeping when the show was starting, and if I wake up, I could watch the movie with her.

I don’t know if she ever did that. She may have because she could be like that. But I don’t think there was any way I was going to wake up. But it shut me up for the time being.

I have to say in the show Dark Matter, in a very reasonable and I think realistic way, they touched on a trope in a different way that was very disturbing and fun to experience.

Blake says he’s envious of those who came up with the show Severance (I like that show too) and said he'd bet when they came up with the conceit of that show, they were punching in the air in celebration.

Blake loved Red Rising, a book that is sci-fi and fantasy. A Game of Thrones sci-fi fantasy set on Mars. He said he’s not usually into leaving Earth for such things, but this is a good series that should be made into a show.

He said he really likes the show Primer. He said he heard they made the show for like $7000. I’ve seen it and I enjoyed it myself. I was a voracious reader through the first half of my life, slowed down when I started needing reading glasses when I turned 40. Now I’m having all kinds of vision problems, making it difficult to read and at times even to watch TV. I don’t know if it was 30 years of sitting in front of a computer screen, or not.

I was used to having better vision than anyone I ever met. I could read road signs down the road from further away than anybody who was ever in a car with me. Sometimes they thought I had memorized all the street signs or something. My hearing was checked in the Air Force and was so good it went right off the edge of the IBM punch card that was recording the session. Te technician running the test thought the machine was broken. But apparently no matter how faint the sound or high-pitched it was, I could still hit the button when they sounds started and exactly when they ended.

In that USAF test, everybody who worked on the flight line near jet engines had to be tested. I realized during the test that I couldn’t quite hear sound at a certain point. I started to think if I couldn’t hear the sounds, I could sort of “feel “them. So I started hitting the button and letting go by a feeling in my chest. Apparently, I was spot on. 


Anyway, my hearing was fine. I was always very protective of my hearing, wearing sound Protectors around jets or the wheeled "ground units", or "ground power units". Generators, basically engines on wheels generating power for the jets to warm up so you didn’t have to burn jet fuel on board. More modern one shown above.

We also had to be careful about being a 25 or 50 feet too close to the exhaust of a jet engine due to radiation or simply being picked up and blown backward. That was the USAF 92nd Field Maintenance Squadron from 1976 to 1979. Interesting times. Even got to meet a Russian agent once off in the woods, in a camper on a truck monitoring the base's signals communications. Nice guy. Base said they didn't care. Fine for the enemy to expend resources counting jet deployments (flights) or unsecured communications but wasn't worth their effort to stop it. Just part of the mission.

Then there was the security police I ran into in the woods across from the base main entrance. Just sitting in their cars getting blasted on cannabis. That next year after that I came to base in the morning from my house near downtown Spokane to be met with heavily armed security police with guard dogs everywhere. Randomly all over the bast, on the streets, which you never saw on base.

Got to our shop and I was told what happened. There was an inspection in the security police barracks and they found 14 cannabis plants growing on the roof so they busted 3/4 of that squadron. On a nuclear SAC base you have to have security police at full staffing. So they called in SP’s from around the nation, over night and while we slept.

I got tasked along with one person from each shop to go around and find mattresses so these guys would have something to sleep on, on the floor somewhere because there was nowhere to put them all. That only lasted few days, a week or so until we got actual replacements requisitioned.

Podcast: apparently, in 2014 the author sold Dark Matter to Sony features. He had only written about 140 or so pages at that point. Damn that must be nice. He said they had sold it to a publisher and somehow the pages got leaked.

He said he and a few other really good screenwriters tried to write a script to make it a feature film, but they could never really crack it. Apparently, I needed a series. They must have done a good job because I’m liking the series.

He said they were having to "kill their darlings" (as we do as writers and filmmakers) and remove the character emotions and character beats that were so important to the story and so eventually gave up making a movie and it moved over to Apple.

This makes me think again that maybe I should take my screenplay “A Teenage Bodyguard” a true-crime drama, that I put massive research into over the years. A story I lived in 1974, though I didn't have a clue the world I was being immersed in. It’s been an interesting journey, living it, forgetting it, decades later writing it, researching it and rewriting it. I just want to get the damn thing out there for people to experience it.

It’s sad because if that story had come out in say 1980, it would be impressive. There were a few people around like I was back in the '60s and '70s as young people who had, let's say, an interesting history. Now partly because of advancements and from social media, everybody knows somebody who did something utterly amazing and none of this is really all that impressive now, which is in a way, too bad.

Still, it did get me a producer a few years ago who works with Michael Douglas. He did get three directors interested who I thought misunderstood the genre or just the story. I see it is a true crime drama. They saw it as a teen romp of some sort.

About Dark Matter, I do like stories about the Multiverse. Like the one based on Thor’s brother, Loki.

Starting mile three…

Apparently, there’s no season two coming as of yet for Dark Matter, and he won’t say at this time.

I agree with the author that in his stories, he likes to leave things open ended, and then hand the baton over to the reader. I like to do that with my own stuff. “In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear“ that story can continue. But you could also argue that it does have an end.

I’ve been wanting to have spaghetti and meatballs lately so yesterday I did. Also drank a half bottle of Malbec red wine. Great fun lunch. Had some fun dessert. But then suffered for in histamine levels I think from the red wine. Had to take half a Benadryl in the evening. Then before bedtime another half. Good times.

I don’t know if that’s a leftover from long Covid or still some long Covid happening. If it's temporary or permanent. But histamines are a big deal with long Covid. It gives you a feeling that is uncomfortable to the point of thinking that something serious is happening.

Anyway, also took half a melatonin (2.5 mg) and I was able to sleep through the night. Woke up feeling an allergy hangover though, maybe a histamine hangover.

I do not feel like walking 3 miles today, as I am. But here I am.

Since I’m having trouble reading anymore, I should make a list here of fun sci-fi TV shows I’ve been watching. Because of long Covid and Covid starting in February 2020 when I first caught it, I’ve watched more TV in a shorter span of time than in my entire life at any one point. That being said, I have tried to learn from it since I do write screenplay and make films. I also watched a bunch of "the making of shows." Love those.

Let's see, sci fi/fantasy  shows I've been watching that I like in no specific order.
  • Silo
  • Dark Matter
  • Various MCU shows
  • Various Star Trek shows
  • Various Star Wars shows
  • Snowpiercer (thought the concept, ridiculous, but still watched the film & TV shows.
  • Fallout
  • Beacon 23
  • 3 Body Problem (Or another version, Three Body, in Chinese)
  • Outer Range
  • Sweet Tooth
  • The Umbrella Academy
  • Orphan Black
  • The Boys
  • For All Mankind
  • Foundation
  • Monarch
  • Severance
  • See (thought the concept ridiculous, but very well done show)
  • Hello Tomorrow
  • Wheel of Time
  • Game of Thrones (obviously)
  • House of Dragons
  • The Last of Us
  • Peripheral
  • Carnival Row
  • American Gods
  • Good Omens
  • Outlander
  • The Magicians
  • The Witcher
  • His Dark Materials
  • Russian Doll
  • The OA
No doubt I'm forgetting a few. Not to mention some you should already know like Stranger Things, or Supernatural, or many of the standards. I'm focusing more on the streaming shows here. So many more than I'd realized. So much great stuff to watch. 

Blake also says he thinks his show exploited the subject matter of the book better than he had. For instance, the primary nuclear family in the story has one son in the book. But at some point in the show, they are a family of four. And that does make the show more interesting. Blake is talking about the difference between writing a novel and producing a show. 

Which has a lot to do with why my own Bodyguard screenplay has yet to be made into a movie. It could’ve been a movie already at this point, I just had to say yes. The director was interested. The producer was excited about it. But that was off the screenplay I rewrote with the producer's input. 

I now call my screenplay "the original". Which is far more historically accurate. My first drafts were more like a docudrama. Lost that format very quickly. But I tried to stay true to the facts. So the screenplay is pretty accurate up to about the halfway point where it becomes necessary to fictionalize somewhat because it is after all an entertainment narrative film.

There were things about the lead female character I simply didn’t know about. So as difficult and frustrating as it was, I took my best guess, and I think what I wrote was entertaining and bittersweet.

When producer Robert Midas read the screenplay the first time he said when he got to the end, his heart broke. That was my goal, at least in part for the story. Because that’s how that story goes.

I think in a different kind of genre I would’ve written it for a feel-good ending. But I was trying to write it for what was more realistic.The world that woman had lived in was very realistic. People were abused, people died.

I think the final scene would’ve been one hell of a scene for a movie's post-credit position. So after turning down three directors, I stopped getting calls from Robert and I started to pursue my original screenplay again. He's a very nice guy. Good at his job. I liked working with him. 

I’ve sent both screenplays off to screenplay contests and so far my version has won more awards. So I think the problem was that Robert was simply trying to make a screenplay, a spec script, that would sell. And it did. But his view of production was at a far lower level than what I see for it as a film. Maybe he's the more realistic one and it will never get made. If not, that would be too bad.

I’m thinking $5 to $7 million and I think he was thinking around 1 million. Take or leave a few hundred thousand. Better to leave a few. But I think that doesn’t do the story justice. I think that doesn’t do the lead female character, justice, and over time I’ve gotten to where I more wanted this to be her story being told, more than my own. I didn't write it from her perspective because I know this story from my own experience in living it.

Originally it wasn’t my story I wanted to get out so much as I wanted to get something produced to acquire some money toward my retirement. Because in the last 20 years, things were rough as a single parent. All of my 401(k) retirement is gone now. Which is fine as my kids are up and living on their own, functional and happy as adults. But we had some rough years there.

Now I have Social Security and my original retirement from the 1990s that was shut off when they switched to a 401(k). So luckily, I still have that but at some point, especially with how politics are going and some wanting to kill things like Medicare and Social Security. Or that Social Security is having problems because of the baby boomer generation being so large… I still don’t quite understand that. If we paid our retirement into Social Security, where the hell is our money in that we won’t be getting it all? Or what?

As I understand it instead of getting increases in Social Security every year, soon we’re going to get decreases. Fun.

So yeah, let's make some money!

I did pretty good this week getting the blog articles up from a walk every day of the week at 6 AM. Missed today's though. I didn’t get around to working on the blog until after lunch and by then the wine had taken affect and I had another extra glass. Usually, I get two meals out of one bottle of wine. Two glasses for the one meal leaving two more for the next one. But I was having so much fun, I took a little bit more and then a little bit more up to less than another full glass. But as I’m learning, especially with red wine nowadays due to whatever reason, if I go over two glasses, I’ll regret it at bedtime.


It’s interesting to think in the Multiverse there’s another version of me somewhere from decisive moments in my life that failed where they succeeded for them elsewhere. I can think of at least three times in my life that, I had something gone the other way, I would have made a lot more money. 

In 1980 I almost published a manual with Digital Equipment Corporation's Digital Publishing with a book I wrote based on a wordprocessor app on the VAX 11/785 mainframe. But because I pointed out where their bugs were and how to get quickly past them, which usually took people hours, Digital proper got pissed off and threatened me. Literally threatened me. They said if I tried to publish it elsewhere, they’d crushed me and they could do it. That was a comedy of errors, that whole process.

I had written a manual that two major Seattle hospitals loved and used for years after I left that job. The Digital publisher said I would be making about $50,000 a quarter with worldwide sales of the manual going out with every VAX computer and PC they sold. Then things changed.

He had told me to rewrite the manual, not to use the specialized format I composed that everyone LOVED. He showed it to Digital Equipment and they didn’t like it. They suggested a way that I had originally designed it to be! And then the bugs were their final straw. You did not admit, surely not in a manual, to having bugs in your software, if you were DEC, back then. 

Dialing into our modem. We caught Digital one time dialing into our modem, applying a patch that brought the mainframe down the next day for two hospitals: UWMC and HMC who we supported. I actually worked for the University of Washington's MCIS handling Pathology and Radiology for those two hospitals

Digital denied putting in the patch. But we could clearly see it in the logs. So my manager said always to keep the modem turned off. They'd have to call and ask us to turn it on for access from now on. And that fixed that. They were kind of shady back then and now? They’re out of business.

When I decided to look for another job from that position, all the jobs around Seattle, all the available jobs were for people who could run IBM mainframes.

So things in my life like that screwed up. What if in another universe, I had fixed those issues and they published the manual? My whole life would’ve changed. I would’ve still gotten divorced though perhaps not for a few more years. Maybe she wouldn’t have become the alcoholic she did, that she was trying so hard to be when we were married, and that I could not see.

Maybe my oldest son wouldn’t have some emotional issues because of when he had been with his mom. Then maybe I wouldn’t have married my last wife which also gave my son even more issues because they hated each other. He was challenging and she didn’t have the maturity or expertise to handle him. My youngest son would be gone now though. I’m pretty sure. Because they had said if I hadn’t been there after the divorce, they wouldn’t be alive now. So maybe things are just how they're supposed to be...

On that note, I’ll bid you adieu…and leave you with that.
It’s noon and time for lunch.

Cheers! Sláinte!