Showing posts with label Medicare. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Medicare. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 8, 2025

Social Security, Medicare, and the Clock Running Out: What 2033 Really Means for Us All

I turn 70 this August. Good grief! I was born in another century, in the middle of that century. And while I refuse to be labeled as a Baby Boomer and I'm obviously not of Generation X, I'm at least a Generation Jones cohort. So anyway...

I started drawing Social Security back in 2016. Like millions of other Americans who’ve paid in for decades, I thought I could finally trust that safety net I helped build. But the latest 2025 Social Security and Medicare Trustees Report has delivered a brutal truth: unless Washington acts, our benefits will be cut in just eight years.

That’s 2033. And no, this isn’t some speculative headline or partisan scare tactic. It’s a cold, bureaucratic statement of fact:

The Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund will be insolvent by 2033. When that happens, everyone’s benefits will be slashed by 21% across the board.

That means retirees—people like me, and maybe you—would see almost a quarter of their monthly income disappear unless Congress steps in. We’re not talking about cuts to people who haven’t retired yet. We’re talking about people currently receiving benefits.

Worse, the Medicare Hospital Insurance (Part A) Trust Fund—the one that pays for hospital stays—will follow, hitting insolvency just three years later in 2036. And while Part B and Part D (doctor visits and prescriptions) are paid through premiums and taxes and will remain solvent, the quality and access to care will likely erode.

So why isn’t anyone doing anything?

Because we live in a clown show now. Congress acts like toddlers. And Donald Trump, now POTUS47, is too busy reenacting 2016 and stoking chaos to bother with boring things like saving retirement benefits for tens of millions of Americans.

Let’s be blunt: Trump has never had a serious plan to save Social Security or Medicare. In fact, he's floated cutting "entitlements" more than once—before pretending he didn’t say it. His allies in Congress? They want to raise the retirement age, cut future benefits, or even privatize the entire system, turning your guaranteed monthly check into something that depends on how the stock market feels that day.

And they’re not doing this in secret. MAGA-aligned House members have already hinted at it in their budget proposals. They’ll deny it publicly—because touching Social Security is political suicide—but they’re quietly working to hollow it out, especially for future generations.

What does this mean for me—and for you?

For me, it’s this simple: I may be looking at a 21% cut in income by the time I’m 78, if I’m still around. For others, it might come sooner. And for anyone younger, it's worse—because they may never see full benefits at all.

Medicare? It’ll still exist, but good luck finding a hospital that hasn’t cut back or tightened access if the government’s reimbursements slow to a trickle.

Meanwhile, the same politicians dragging their feet on this are:

  • Handing out tax cuts to billionaires like candy

  • Throwing money at the Pentagon like it’s a bottomless pit

  • And blocking any proposal that would tax high earners a little more to fix the trust fund shortfall

So where does that leave us?

We’ve got 8 years. That’s the countdown. If nothing is done, Social Security gets gutted and Medicare starts to crack.

If Trump and his MAGA bloc stay in charge, we should expect:

  • No real solution

  • A last-minute scramble

  • Possibly a cruel trade-off: “You want your Social Security? Give us more tax cuts for the rich.”

We should not be fooled by false reassurances or performative patriotism. This is about math, not ideology. Either the country shores up the programs we paid into, or it defaults on a promise it’s made to every American worker for nearly a century.

I earned my benefits. So did you. And now they want to tell us they can’t afford it—after decades of robbing the future to pay for tax cuts and wars? I don’t think so.

Final Thought

This isn’t about left or right. It’s about whether we let this government break the biggest promise it ever made to its people. And it’s about whether we let the same crew that brought us disinformation, deficits, and dysfunction decide who gets to age with dignity—and who doesn’t.

They’ve got eight years.

We’re watching.



Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Idioitology of the Trump Administration's RFK Jr. In Attacking Our Citizen's Health

This blog is about our healthcare system. However, I’ll begin with my own experience with COVID-19 and Long Covid, share some of what I’ve learned, briefly touch on the Trump administration—and then dismantle the nonsense of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. pretending to be an authority on anything.


Idiotology? OK, it's satire, but not unreal either. Take your pick:
  • Dumbocracy
  • Moronism
  • Ignorantism
  • Stupiditarianism
  • Quackosophy
  • Imbecurianism (play on imbecile + sectarian
Why do I feel that way? Things like this:

US health secretary calls leading medical journals such as Lancet ‘corrupt’ and pushes to create state-run alternatives

I first showed symptoms of COVID-19 on February 9, 2020—before we even knew what it was. Since then, I’ve had COVID two more times. I’ve gotten every shot and booster available. Throughout this, I’ve relied on my Veterans Administration healthcare, with some initial support from Medicare.

Over time, I’ve learned a great deal about both COVID and Long Covid. Once I was well enough to think clearly again, I remembered: I’m a writer. I was a senior technical writer and researcher. I realized I could share what I’d learned.

I’ve written about this before in a previous blog:


I've detailed all this in my book, Suffering Long Covid: Alleviating Symptoms & Just Maybe...Shortening Them - This is What happened What I experienced. What worked...for me. And, what really didn't. (2022, Revised 2024). I learned a lot about...a lot. Which led to my having "Long Covid" a few times, though one wonders if it ever really left (it has now). But it affected something I didn't even know I had, that we all have, the wonderful and dreadful, Vagus Nerve. 

I learned a lot about the Vagus Nerve and I've written about it on this blog. My cousin, my age within three months (younger) than me, had issues with that when coming off medication she'd been on for some years in a terrifying experience that mimics my own through Long Covid. 

I woke today hearing a report on NPR about Robert F Kennedy, Jr. the Trump administrations ridiculous 26th United States Secretary of Health and Human Services since February 2025:

RFK Jr. says COVID shots no longer recommended for kids, pregnant women

That was followed up by another report elsewhere. It's about the TACO trade:

Trump always chickens out’ trade is the talk of Wall Street. Here’s one way to play it.
Tariff threats may still offer near-term opportunity but won’t determine market’s next big move, strategist says

Donald Trump’s Politics of Plunder
The greed of the new Administration has galvanized America’s aspiring oligarchs—and their opponents.

What is going on in Washington DC? But healthcare isn't political. Right?

This IS about Covid here and in part, about my book on it, mostly, on long covid. Should you take the Covid shots and boosters. My take on this? Yes! Absolutely yes, as medical science indicates.

As for RFK Jr? He's pushing an ideology. We don't do that in medicine. We push research, data, results. He's essentially pushing internet memes.

Suffering Long Covid: Alleviating Symptoms & Just Maybe...Shortening Them - This is What happened What I experienced. What worked...for me. And, what really didn't, or "Suffering 'Long Covid': Alleviating My Long Covid Symptoms While Trying To Kill It" is a personal account by JZ Murdock detailing his experiences with COVID-19 and the subsequent long-term effects. The book outlines his background, the nature of the virus, and the various symptoms he endured, including fatigue, brain fog, and heart-related issues. Murdock emphasizes that his findings are based on his individual experience and should be discussed with a doctor before being implemented.


The book is structured around Murdock's personal journey, beginning with his initial infection in February 2020 and continuing through multiple reinfections and bouts of long COVID. He describes the challenges of diagnosis, the frustration of conflicting medical information, and the difficulty of finding effective treatments. A significant portion of the book is dedicated to remedies he explored, including medications like Valacyclovir, vitamin supplements, dietary changes, and lifestyle adjustments. He stresses the importance of sleep, exercise, and a balanced diet in managing his symptoms.


The latter half of the book consists of Murdock's daily logs, offering a raw and detailed account of his physical and emotional state, fears and success, and failures, throughout his long COVID experience. These logs provide insights into his mental processes, the effectiveness of different treatments, and the challenges of navigating the healthcare system. He also includes a reference section with links to research and personal resources.


The 2024 update includes recent findings on long COVID, such as the CDC's updated definition, the WHO's pandemic prevention plan, and various studies exploring symptoms, testing, and treatments. Murdock emphasizes the importance of staying informed and proactive in managing long COVID.


Overall, "Suffering 'Long Covid'" serves as a personal guide and resource for others experiencing similar symptoms, offering insights, practical advice, and a message of hope in the face of a challenging and often misunderstood condition. It highlights the complexity of long COVID and the importance of individualized approaches to treatment and management.

A December 2022 verified purchaser review on the Amazon page says this:

"As we enter our 3rd year of the COVID-19 Pandemic there are a variety of side effects being experienced by over25 million Americans from the over 100 million cases of COVID-19.

"The author provides excellent detailed observations and research into the symptoms he suffered during his personal experience with LONG COVD. Through the fatigue and other symptoms, you can gain insight into what you and your family may be experiencing.

I"t is a detailed quick read and he used his background as a researcher and writer to bring greater awareness and understanding to the LONG COVID condition.

"As someone who worked in epidemiology for 18 years I found this book to be an excellent resource of information.

Briefly I want to mention one update since the last revision of my book, regarding lysine.

Increasing intake of l-lysine seems to correspond to an improvement in various symptoms implying a potential connection between lysine's dietary effects and overall health, possibly including gut health mediated by the vagus nerve. While it's not explicitly stated, the gut's reaction to lysine could relate to how the vagus nerve adapts to changes in digestive function and gut biome, which in turn may affect broader health symptoms experienced by the author.

Getting back to RFK Jr. another Trump nightmare imposed upon the American people and by default, the rest of the world.


Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s recent actions and statements as U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services are drawing significant international attention, particularly concerning public health policies.

Withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO)

On May 27, 2025, Kennedy, alongside Argentina's Health Minister Mario Lugones, announced their countries' withdrawal from the WHO, citing mismanagement during the COVID-19 pandemic and a lack of independent, science-based leadership. They proposed forming an alternative global health alliance emphasizing scientific integrity and national sovereignty.

Changes to COVID-19 Vaccine Recommendations

Kennedy has directed the CDC to remove COVID-19 vaccines from its recommended immunization schedule for healthy children and pregnant women. This decision, made without the usual advisory committee consultation, has raised concerns about increased vulnerability to COVID-19 in these populations and potential financial barriers to vaccine access.

Criticism of Medical Journals

Kennedy has proposed barring NIH-funded scientists from publishing in leading medical journals like The Lancet, NEJM, and JAMA, accusing them of pharmaceutical industry influence. He suggests creating new in-house journals under NIH control, a move that critics argue could undermine the credibility of publicly funded research.

"Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) Initiative

Kennedy's MAHA initiative targets chronic illnesses by addressing factors like ultra-processed foods, environmental toxins, and overprescription of medications. While some public health experts acknowledge the need to tackle these issues, others criticize the initiative for promoting unproven theories and downplaying established scientific consensus, particularly regarding vaccines.

Global Repercussions

Kennedy's policies are causing concern among international health experts. His stance on vaccines and departure from the WHO could influence other nations' public health strategies, potentially leading to decreased vaccination rates and weakened global health cooperation.

In summary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s health policies are prompting significant debate and concern on the global stage, with potential implications for international public health initiatives and collaborations.

To evaluate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s assertions against COVID-19 vaccines and boosters, it’s critical to listen to credible experts and institutions with a track record of scientific rigor, transparency, and public health responsibility. Here's who you should prioritize:


✅ Trusted Sources to Listen To:

1. Independent Scientists & Medical Experts

  • Dr. Peter Hotez, vaccine scientist at Baylor College of Medicine

  • Dr. Paul Offit, pediatrician and vaccine developer

  • Dr. Anthony Fauci (retired), former head of NIAID

These experts have no ties to pharmaceutical sales and have published extensively in peer-reviewed journals.


2. Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals

  • The New England Journal of Medicine

  • The Lancet

  • JAMA (Journal of the American Medical Association)

These journals require rigorous peer review and conflict-of-interest disclosure.


3. Public Health Institutions

  • World Health Organization (WHO)

  • U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

  • European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)

They analyze massive global datasets and coordinate public health policies that have saved millions of lives.


4. Non-Partisan Fact-Checking Orgs

  • Health Feedback

  • Science Based Medicine

  • FactCheck.org’s SciCheck

These platforms evaluate scientific claims without political or financial agendas.


⚠️ Who Not to Rely On:

  • Celebrity activists without epidemiology or virology credentials

  • Politicians using fear or pseudoscience for political gain

  • "Alternative health" sites selling supplements or books promoting fear of mainstream medicine

  • YouTube or Substack personalities who cherry-pick or misrepresent data


RFK Jr.’s anti-vaccine assertions have been widely debunked by scientific consensus, and his stance has alarmed public health experts worldwide. If his advice were followed globally, it could result in higher mortality, preventable suffering, and loss of herd immunity for multiple diseases—not just COVID.

Here’s a summary of key rebuttals to Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s claims about COVID-19 vaccines and boosters, from credible scientific sources:


🔬 1. Claim: COVID vaccines are dangerous or unnecessary

✅ Rebuttal:

  • Extensive clinical trials and real-world data (millions of participants worldwide) show mRNA vaccines significantly reduce severe illness, hospitalization, and death.

  • Side effects are generally mild and temporary. Serious side effects are extremely rare and monitored closely by systems like VAERS and V-Safe.

  • Studies published in The Lancet, NEJM, and JAMA confirm vaccine safety and effectiveness.

📚 Source: CDC, WHO, European Medicines Agency, peer-reviewed studies.


🧬 2. Claim: Natural immunity is better than vaccine-induced immunity

✅ Rebuttal:

  • Natural infection can offer some immunity, but vaccine-induced immunity is safer and more consistent.

  • Hybrid immunity (vaccine + prior infection) is strongest. But relying on infection alone is riskier and more deadly, especially with newer variants.

📚 Source: Nature Medicine, Science, CDC.


💉 3. Claim: Boosters are unnecessary or harmful

✅ Rebuttal:

  • Boosters restore waning immunity and are especially important for older adults and those with underlying conditions.

  • Updated boosters are designed to target newer variants, helping reduce breakthrough infections and hospitalizations.

📚 Source: FDA, CDC ACIP committee, international health agencies.


🧪 4. Claim: Vaccine data is manipulated or suppressed

✅ Rebuttal:

  • Data is reviewed by independent advisory panels (e.g., VRBPAC, ACIP) with public meetings and recorded sessions.

  • Researchers across the globe publish vaccine efficacy and adverse event data freely—Kennedy ignores the transparent, collaborative nature of science.

📚 Source: FDA.gov, CDC.gov, global science press.


⚠️ 5. Claim: Vaccines are part of a government or pharma conspiracy

✅ Rebuttal:

  • This is a classic disinformation tactic—relying on distrust, emotion, and anecdote rather than data.

  • Kennedy frequently cherry-picks discredited studies, quotes them out of context, and ignores massive evidence to the contrary.

📚 Fact-checked by: Health Feedback, Snopes, Science Based Medicine, AP News.


🧠 Bottom Line:

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s anti-vaccine positions contradict the overwhelming consensus of global science. Following his advice would likely have led to millions more deaths. He’s been criticized by family members, top scientists, and health officials for spreading misinformation that endangers public health.

In the end, our healthcare system—and public trust in it—depends on facts, not fearmongering. My experience with COVID-19 and Long Covid taught me how vital science, credible expertise, and access to reliable care truly are. When figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. spread misinformation under the guise of “health freedom,” they put lives at risk. We deserve leaders and policies grounded in reality, not conspiracy. Our health depends on it.


Compiled with aid of ChatGPT and MyReader AI

Wednesday, April 9, 2025

Undocumented Workers Are Funding Your Retirement—And Getting Screwed

 Watch “I wasn’t aware of that” on YouTube: 

​Against all MaGA/Trumpian toxic conservative disinformation, in 2022, undocumented immigrants contributed $96.7 billion into Social Security & Medicare, and they'll receive nothing. Really, just kinda screwing ourselves there. 


Same as we've done with migrant farmworkers?

Exactly—history repeating itself. Just like with farmworkers in the recent past, there’s a push to get undocumented workers out, only to realize too late that they were essential all along. The same thing would happen if they were removed from industries like construction, food service, and elder care. 

It's like shooting yourself in the foot and then wondering why you can’t walk.

​In 2022, undocumented immigrants contributed significantly to U.S. social programs:​

  • Social Security: $25.7 billion​ 

  • Medicare: $6.4 billion​

These contributions are part of the approximately $96.7 billion in total taxes paid by undocumented immigrants that year.

Despite these substantial payments, undocumented immigrants are generally ineligible to receive benefits from these programs. ​

These figures underscore the significant role undocumented immigrants play in supporting U.S. social insurance programs.

Yeah, it's a pretty ironic situation—undocumented workers pump billions into programs they can’t even benefit from, essentially subsidizing Social Security and Medicare for everyone else. If anything, the system relies on their contributions, but they’re demonized instead of acknowledged for it.

Is there a counter to that, because one assumes rationally speaking, there just isn't a reasonable counter to that

It’s really hard to argue against the fact that undocumented immigrants contribute billions to Social Security and Medicare without getting benefits in return. But the usual counterarguments tend to be emotional, ideological, or based on broader concerns rather than directly addressing this specific point. Here are the most common ones:
  1. "They still use public services."

    • Some argue that undocumented immigrants use emergency healthcare, public schools, and infrastructure without paying their "fair share." However, studies show they pay into taxes at local, state, and federal levels while receiving fewer benefits than citizens.

  2. "They drive down wages."

    • Critics claim undocumented workers undercut wages by accepting lower pay, making it harder for legal residents to compete. However, economists are divided on this, with some finding minimal impact on wages and others noting that undocumented labor fills jobs that many Americans avoid.

  3. "They're here illegally—tax contributions don't justify breaking the law."

    • This is more of a moral/legal argument than an economic one. The idea is that even if they contribute, it doesn’t excuse their undocumented status. But this ignores the reality that many industries (agriculture, construction, hospitality) depend on undocumented labor.

  4. "They send money abroad instead of reinvesting in the U.S."

    • Some critics point out that undocumented workers send remittances to their home countries, which doesn't help the U.S. economy. But this ignores the fact that they still spend money on rent, food, transportation, and taxes—stimulating local economies.

  5. "They take jobs from Americans."

    • This claim assumes a zero-sum job market, which isn't how economies work. In many cases, undocumented workers take low-wage, physically demanding jobs that have persistent labor shortages, rather than positions most Americans are competing for.

The reality is that undocumented immigrants contribute significantly to the economy, and removing them would likely create serious financial strain on Social Security, Medicare, and multiple industries. The counterarguments tend to focus on legal or emotional perspectives rather than the hard numbers.

So, there it is. What is our mistake then in all this? Listening to Donald Trump, apparently. Electing him as POTUS45, realizing he's an autocrat destructive to America and democracy, and then, re-electing him to continue his damage to our country, now that he's more astute at our destruction.

When WILL we ever learn? Probably when we realize just how important education is and holding people in power to account.

Yeah, better be soon. Real soon...

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Tuesday, February 14, 2023

Walkabout Thoughts #33

My thoughts, Stream of consciousness, rough and ready, while walking off long Covid and listening to podcasts…


Weather for the day… 44 degrees and light clouds lots of blue sky

Podcast for the day podcast “Pod Save America“ episode, “

Instagram post for the day

Olympic Mountains today

“Trump has reminded us that misogyny is a feature not a bug in the Republican Party”

“Pompeo hates Nikki Haley”

Paraphrasing “Nikki Haley is just a Kevin McCarthy“

So I told my adult trans kid I’d like to take them and their trans spouse out for that kid's birthday next weekend. I said pick a place and we'll go there. Thinking that’s part of a gift. And their response was, "Oh so I choose?" Yeah. Sure. In part because of their dietary requirements being hard for me to track. And thinking about that, as many do (with a roll of the eyes, and I’m not saying I’m doing that, but people do), it occurs to me...Why do so many seem so attuned to their physiology regarding diet? That’s annoying to many who are not. But here’s the thing. As we’ve become more educated and knowledgeable about diet and an awareness of things, why would we not become more attuned to ourselves, internally? And how is that a bad thing? One might argue even that it’s bullshit. But if you’re eating healthier because of it, then how is that bad? It’s annoying to others, sure. But what if it’s not imaginary? When I was a kid, and this is how I’m viewing this whole issue… I was fifth or sixth grade, my mom took me over to a friend's house. Some woman who had a couple of Siamese cats (that's another story). While I was talking to this woman when we first got there, I felt my body invaded. It was a weird kind of rush. I could see her breathing down on me, standing a few feet from my mom and I inside the front door. I couldn’t put my finger on the feeling I was having until later. But I started not feeling well later that day. The next day I felt worse and my mom said the woman was talking to her on the phone and said she thinks she came down with something. By the next day I was feeling so bad my mom took me to the doctor. And he said, "You’ve got the flu or something." I told him I knew it, and then about the woman, realizing I felt I was catching something from her, apparently a virus. I felt something invading my body while talking to her, probably my immune system over responding. Years later, a doctor told me that my allergies were my immune system overreacting too rapidly to invading elements. And if it was slower, my body could adjust and I wouldn’t have all these allergy issues. This was back in the early 70s by that time. So the doctor when I was a kid, in his office, said, "I’m sorry but it’s impossible that you’re feeling ill or could have felt her give you the flu as you stood in front of her. It takes about two weeks for you to feel the symptoms." I didn’t know what to do with that. He’s a doctor. I was a kid. But the thing was, he’s right about a week or two to feel the symptoms. But I wasn’t feeling the symptoms the day I met that woman. I was feeling an invasion and my immune system reacting. I’ve always been very tuned into my physiology. And I’ve always been discredited on that. But it’s been proven to be accurate over my 67 years. By time I hit my teens, it wasn’t quite as accurate, as you get older, it diminishes. But still seems to be more awareness than other people I've known. Getting back to my original premise… I do also believe that food is medicine, or can be. Sure, some take things to extremes. Some always do. But there is logic, and science in it. Eat healthier, you're healthier. Eat poorly, your health will suffer for it, though you may not notice it at first or until you're old, and some can handle that better than others. At least some of these people, with our better education and knowledge today than we had so long ago when I was a kid, if they're more tuned into their bodies now and trying to eat better… other than being annoying to some of us, what the hell is the problem with that? Don’t get me wrong. I like eating meat. But ethically and morally, I realized once a society gets to a place where they don’t have to hunt and kill for their food, why are we still killing other species for food? Not to mention, eating a lot of meat in a diet is unhealthy and can kill you over time. Granted not everybody, but we’re not all the same, biologically speaking. That’s why one person can smoke as much as another, yet one gets lung, cancer and dies and the other lives to 100 and is healthy. But it doesn’t mean everybody’s wrong. And that doesn’t mean we’re always correctly righteous in our annoyed beliefs.

It occurs to me that with some people, probably younger than me, who are doing what they're doing today about their diets and stuff, as I was discussing above, people traditionally did pay attention only once they had health problems. When they were told to log their health statistics, day by day. Which I’ve been doing since I got long Covid back in April, almost a year ago. So if they don’t need to log it all to figure things out, and can simple tell, more power to them. I’ve been getting a lot of migraine visuals lately. I used to get maybe a migraine every year or two, or every so many years. I would go a little blind, start to see visuals, start seeing bright colors at about a half an hour before the pain hit. Which could last for three days. I read somewhere that as you get older you don’t necessarily get the pain, but the visuals. So I counted in my log today and found I had migraine visuals, seven times in the past 30 days. Which I assume has got to be because of long Covid. It's disturbing.

Speaking of which, I read somewhere else that long Covid can thicken your vagus nerve. Is that good or bad? Probably bad, right? Which are the issues I’ve been having, vagus nerve issues. Since this is the second time, I am sure, as I had long Covid the first time lasting 8 to 14 months long, I have to wonder if repeated long Covid physically changes/damages something? And if one's vagus nerve gets thickened? Does that mean you’re not having permanent issues while things being magnified? Like when I first got it, that was really bad and I had to go into the ER with couple paramedic visits due to my pulse/BP shooting up and I became hyper sensitive to certain foods. As this has is faded, will it never go completely away because I may now have a thicker vagus nerve? Does thicker mean it's more functional or less, and if more that seems to be over reacting to things. Just great. 

Here’s a nightmare scenario. My poor son and his girlfriend have been dealing with her heart issues for a year now. Something she’s perhaps been ignoring for years, as we tend to do when it's not obvious what the problem is. She’s been having seizures and things that she didn’t recognize until the doctors figured it out and gave her meds. They couldn’t get the meds figured out. They'd get them "figured out" and then they'd fail before she could go home from the hospital stay. "Hello again, hi, bye!" Sorry. That was a like, cute one year old I just walked by with his mom… Anyway she left their city to go to Seattle and then back home and then back again and then back home but didn’t make it. Had to stop at another hospital in another city and on and on for a year. So I said to my son, at least once, did she have Covid? And he said, "Yes." I told him then that she may have had long Covid and not even known it. And if that’s the case, it magnifies things. I wrote a book about it, "Suffering Long Covid" And I published it. He gave her a copy but he doesn’t think she read it. Which may be good because there’s some hard realities in that book. Anyway, as of yesterday they finally think they’ve got things worked out and she can come home. But we’ve heard this so many times. "Hi". This time it was my postal woman delivering mail a few blocks from my house. I'm headed onto my 3rd mile now [I jumped back up from below, later on, so that explains my mileage being out of sequence, shit happens...]. So anyway, all the medication they tried on her has reacted in ways they didn’t expect and... that’s what long Covid does to you. So, as time passes, a long Covid phase for her fading, it could be that meds will start to work correctly, as they seem to be. Finally. But I don’t know. She’s got some good doctors, at some good hospitals, who know what they’re talking about, and they think Covid is definitely a factor. Now that could mean the initial week or so of Covid damaged her heart. Or that the long Covid issues were screwing with her results. There’s also a study that says it can kill off some of the muscle cells inside your heart which cannot grow back and that’s a serious concern. So you could end up with a heart transplant. But here’s hoping next week they’re both finally having dinner together and this nightmare can finally be, if not over, better controlled. I think they’re giving her a pacemaker now. Which is sad because no one needs a pacemaker in their 30s, although sometimes you do.

I think I walked a mile last walk and the time before that, or at least the last time anyway. I’m just starting my 2nd mile and at the end of that I’ll see if I can walk a third. I’d like to at least do that today. So far my right knee is holding out…

Regarding this bullshit about Medicare and Social Security with Republicans. There’s a news clip of one of them saying that those things are very important but so is military spending. But we review military spending every year. Well, dumb ass. The obvious difference there, which only a disingenuous fool couldn’t see, is that we don’t know from year to year how much military spending we will need with a current forecast. But we know that American citizens, our human beings still need to live and survive, to have healthcare and money to live on they expected, some for over 50 years. Kind of not an ever-changing thing like a military budget. That is so simple to understand and obvious that it’s offensive that a professional adult politician would speak such dumb words in public. But then, his voters probably won't notice. He's a Republican. (No, not all Republicans are dumb, but MAGA has altered the stats on that) So...

That was centered around comparing thing as "citizens need" to "military budget". Ron Johnson said that about those, I wanna call them "entitlements", because we should be entitled to them and we funded them ourselves as citizens, he says it’s a Ponzi scheme. Well, if you look at it critically, it’s not. Unless you’re a Republican, apparently. But let’s say it is. Well, then? Fix it! Something Republicans hate to do. Fix things. Because it opens them up to criticism and hard work. And compromise. They love breaking things and shutting things down and defunding things and crippling government. You know it’s a lot easier to take a sledgehammer and destroy a house then it is to build one that’s viable and functional that you can live in.

By the way, Rick Scott in Congress ,who is so against Medicare and Social Security? We need to recognize the company he used to work for, who was fined over $1 billion for fraud in those areas. Makes you wonder why he hates social security and medicare so much.

By the way, even Mitch McConnell can’t stand Rick Scott.

Thinking about this for a second. When you see news clips of some Republican, talking to a group of senior citizens about how we need to kill Medicare and Social Security, and they don’t say anything. Or maybe even applaud? Those are not people who need Social Security, or Medicare. Those are wealthy seniors who just see it as taking their tax money. First of all, fuck them. If you got that much money, you should be taxed. Get these Republicans in a room with a good deal of America who need help. The middle class, not the upper class, not the upper middle class. As I understand it, there’s wealthy people who actually use Medicare, while some refuse to rightly indicating it's kind of immoral. Yes, ethically if you paid into it, you deserve it. But if you don't need it and other do and you are after all a part of a nation, a society, yeah, like I don't know...help others? And I would bet they take Social Security, too.

I don’t know what the stats are on this, but if wealthy Americans are paying into Social Security all their lives? And they don’t need it at all in any way, shape or form? How about we don’t give it to them? Wouldn't that help? I mean, if I were a wealthy person, that would be my attitude about it? I have plenty, give it to those who need it. It's charity, it's partiotism.

OK, on the issue of privatizing Social Security, or for that matter, Medicare… or most things...No! Time and again we have seen Republicans push for the privatization of  things, at times even convincing Democrats, as it has so often turned out to be a complete disaster. One that they keep trying to keep alive. Ideology over reality, as usual. You don’t privatize prisons! It’s ethically and morally wrong. Just as the State, with a capital "S", should not kill its own citizens, so I'm against capital punishment (except for maybe people like Trump, who have massively harmed massive amounts of people). When the State takes away a person's, freedom, and imprisons them, that should be the government, not a for profit business picking up that responsibility. That is the government shirking ITS responsibility. That should be an alternate motto of the Republican Party: Shirk Responsibility!

OK I’m about quarter-mile into my 3rd mile (just after seeing the 1 year old and saying hi and bye), and my knee tweaked. I could maybe finish the 3rd mile, but it's safer to turn around and walk back. Let it rest and try again another day. Rehab can be painfully slow, but if you overdo it like (as with long Covid), you’ll really regret it and it can then take longer. When I get home, I need to stretch like the VA nurse said, and then ice it.

And now Adam Schiff is on the podcast…

So my blog is called murdockinations.com, and it’s about the machinations of, if not the phenomenal, the phenomenological mind of this sci-fi/horror writer and filmmaker/documentarian. Just wanted to make that clear...

Excellent! Adam Schiff just said that McConnell and Rrump stacked the courts and they need to be unstacked, and the only way to do that is to expand SCOTUS. And he’s looking at term limits. Finally, thank God. America’s been broken. It needs fixing. I don’t want to expand the SCOTUS but we have to fix things and sometimes it’s uncomfortable. He also mentioned Gerrymandering, as far too often the minority is running things or choosing the president. The minority needs a voice, obviously, but they don’t need control. Obviously.

In the end today, I got in 2.5 miles (6,115 steps) before having to turn home as my knee had finally had it for the day, even if I hadn't. Hang in there little guy.

Cheers! Sláinte!

Monday, April 29, 2013

Raise the medicare age? No.


This talk about raising the age limit on medicare from sixty-five to sixty-seven really pisses me off. I've talked about this before here. I've mentioned it to people I know personally and whenever I bring it up, people look at me like it's a new idea, or like I'm nuts. Why is that? Why isn't it even in the realm of their considerations? And more, why don't they even consider that we are working far too much, for far too long?

It's a fiscally bad idea to raise the Medicare age. It doubles the amount it will cost us, although it won't really adversely affect the individuals involved. It's just a bone for the Administration to throw to the GOP to make the move on other topics they should want to move on, anyway.

Our priorities as always, are all screwed up. We need ideals, we need higher ideals... to shoot for.

Since the 1940s we should have been shooting for these ideals, certainly since the 1950s and 60s. But we have gone the other direction. We have let corporations take over our ideals and our ethics. We have allowed moral-less institutions to run our ideals and priorities.

Ask yourself, why are we working longer hours? Why are we working further into our old age. Yes, we are living longer now. So perhaps we should be staying the same in things, retiring at the same age, medicare at the same age and so on.

But in all these years, as science fiction professed in the early years of the last century, we read that robots would be taking over for the difficult, dangerous and redundant tasks. And indeed, they are beginning to. We read that we would be having more leisure times in our daily lives and old age to study the arts, to add to the quality of our lives, to travel, to have the difficulties of daily life to be made less and less important. And some of those have.

But ask yourself why aren't we holding up ideals of working fewer days per week, fewer hours per day, and retiring earlier to enjoy our elder days in immersing ourselves in the arts and higher considerations of Human capabilities? Why aren't we respecting our elders more because they have become more educated, more knowledgeable and therefore more able to give us guidance? Why are things going the other way?

We should be shooting for working four day workweeks, just as one day long ago we started working six day and then five day workweeks. We should be working shorter days, going down to six and four hour workdays. We should be retiring at sixty-three not sixty-five, or sixty, or going back to the old days of being fifty-five and starting to enjoy the fruits of our labors. We should be working toward increasing life's quality.

But we're not, are we?

We're working longer hours, some of us are working two and three jobs to make ends meet. We're working later into our retirement years, not because it is required by law but because we cannot afford to retire and begin to enjoy our "retirement" years. Some are dying in their jobs rather than being able to afford to quit work and have the money to enjoy life, rather than quit and sit around because we can't afford to do things, to travel, to take up a hobby that will enhance our culture and society. We should more and more be dying in our old age on vacations, not at work.

Why is that? Why don't we have those ideals as... well, our Ideals?

Isn't our goal, shouldn't our goal be... to enhance our lives, not enhance the bottom line for government and corporations? Yes, on the surface, especially considering how things have been economically lately, this all sounds just, what? Stupid? Ludicrous? But back up a minute and ask yourself WHY does this sound ludicrous? Because, it shouldn't. Think about that for a minute longer. And let it alter your view on how we are moving forward and consider that one thing.

Are we really moving forward?

And if your decision is no, then ask yourself, and ask others as well:

Why?