Showing posts with label power. Show all posts
Showing posts with label power. Show all posts

Monday, June 22, 2026

What Would Reagan Do With AI? (And Why the Answer Should Embarrass Us)

I'll be brief...


I've been thinking about Ronald Reagan, which is not something I do casually. I'm old enough to have lived through his presidency with my eyes open, and my feelings about the man are complicated in the way that most honest assessments of powerful people tend to be.

I actually voted for him for his first term. Long an independent, I believed you do what feels right, not just for your party, your tribe, your...ignorance?

I did not vote for his second term. That being said, I WAS by 2000 aware enough then to NOT vote for Geroge W. Bush and gave up on America when he was re-elected. Obama brought me back to hope, not realizing that in exercising joy over better lucidity, knowledge, humanity, decency (not saying Bush wasn't a decent man, really just an ignorant one, like Donald Trump, but now here near as lazy or ignorant, self-involved and far more decent than Trump), and a better understanding of America. We so offended the right they became the Far Right, dove into fantasy and conspiracy theories and we got...Trump. Worst...yeah, well, anyway...we all know that.

So, here's the thought experiment that keeps nagging at me: what if he woke up today?

Not 1985 Reagan. 2026 today Reagan. Coffee in hand, turning on a screen, discovering that we've built machines that think, argue, write, compose, and lie with the fluency of a career politician.

His first reaction would be wonder. I'm sure of it. 

Reagan was many things, but he was genuinely moved by big ideas. He'd sit with Claude AI or ChatGPT the way a kid sits with a magic trick — not looking for the catch, just letting himself feel amazed. That quality in him was real, whatever you thought of his politics.

Then the questions would start.

Who owns this? Who controls what it says? Who decided what it believes?

Because Reagan spent his entire public life warning about concentrated power. The danger of a small group of people controlling information, shaping narrative, deciding what the rest of us get to know. He always imagined that threat wearing a government uniform. He'd have to sit with the uncomfortable reality that it doesn't anymore. It wears a hoodie and operates out of San Francisco. 

Or it's an American Oligarch. Embraced by government, under Trump.

He'd be disturbed by deepfakes in a way that cuts deeper than policy. Reagan was a creature of narrative. He understood instinctively that stories are how humans make sense of the world, how we decide who to trust, what to believe, who we are. 

The idea that the machinery of narrative itself becomes untrustworthy — that you can no longer trust your own eyes and ears — that wouldn't just trouble him politically. 

It would trouble him existentially.

He'd land on China as his organizing frame, because that's the substitution that makes sense. No Soviets, but the familiar shape is still there: free world versus authoritarian power, and whoever controls the most powerful technology controls the future. He'd be comfortable in that argument. It would feel like home.

And then he'd do what every politician since has done: try to apply a coherent but outdated philosophy to something genuinely new, dress it in the language of the moment, and hope the public doesn't notice the seams.

Which is, if we're being honest, exactly what we're watching right now. Confident men with old maps trying to navigate territory that didn't exist when those maps were drawn.

Donald Trump is lost in the '80s. For that matter, so is Putin.

Reagan at least has the excuse of having been dead.

The rest of them are just hoping you won't ask too many questions.

I'm sure it will all be "just fine." Bless their little hearts...

Cheers! Sláinte! Na zdravie!



JZ Murdock is a retired Senior Technical Writer/IT administrator, and an active award-winning author/ filmmaker, documentarian, and writer based in Bremerton, Washington. 

He publishes commentary on the state of things at murdockinations.com and on his creative works over at Substack. He also posts on Slasher.com on the horror genre.

If this work means something to you, you can support it at Ko-fi. Tips are always welcome and go directly toward keeping independent documentary work possible.


Thursday, October 16, 2025

Trump and the Spirit of Antichrist

Every era, it seems, summons its own Antichrist. Ours has our own, Donald Trump.


Image above from: The Conversation Australia + NZ May 9 · In casting himself as supreme leader and pope, Donald Trump inadvertently invoked the Christian understanding of the Antichrist.

Not always the horned figure of Revelation, nor the apocalyptic destroyer feared by televangelists, but something quieter — the spirit of Antichrist that Scripture says has already entered the world. The apostle John warned that there would be “many antichrists,” each one a distortion of Christ’s message disguised as a savior or a patriot.

The cleverest of them doesn’t curse Christ — he claims Him.
He invokes faith, family, and freedom while inverting their meaning.
He holds up the Bible as a totem while breaking its core tenets in deed.

That is how an Antichrist works — not through open rebellion but through counterfeit devotion.


The Clever Antichrist

When Jesus warned of “false prophets” who come “in sheep’s clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves” (Matthew 7:15), He wasn’t describing atheists or pagans. He was warning about the charismatic deceiver who cloaks his hunger for power in righteousness.

The Antichristos is not merely against Christ — the Greek prefix “anti” also means in place of.
Thus the Antichrist is the substitute Christ, the counterfeit who stands where holiness should stand, commanding allegiance not to God but to himself.

And in our time, that archetype has found a disturbingly clear expression.


Trump’s Faith in Himself

Donald Trump’s rise to power and his relationship with religion is unlike any in modern American history. He speaks of divine favor, waves a Bible for cameras, calls himself “the chosen one,” and inspires followers to believe his survival and success are proof of God’s will.

Yet his words and deeds consistently betray the very Gospel he invokes.
He mocks the meek, scorns the poor, celebrates cruelty, and prizes vengeance.
He lies reflexively, often to the cheers of those who claim to follow the Truth incarnate.
And he wraps these contradictions in the banner of Christianity itself.

This inversion — calling evil good and good evil, invoking faith to justify sin — is precisely the pattern described in Scripture for the Antichrist spirit: deception under divine pretense.


The Scriptural Parallels

Below is a concise comparison between traditional Biblical descriptions of the Antichrist and Trump’s observed behaviors and rhetoric as cited by historians, journalists, and theologians.


Biblical / Theological TraitTrump Parallel Often CitedScriptural Reference
Self-exaltation and blasphemous pride – magnifies himself above all, demands adoration.Calls himself “the Chosen One,” says “Only I can fix it,” seeks loyalty pledges, enjoys near-worship from followers.2 Thessalonians 2:3–4 — “He exalts himself above every so-called god… proclaiming himself to be God.”
Deceives through lies and false wondersHabitual falsehoods; alternate-reality politics accepted as truth by followers (“fake news” inversion).2 Thess 2:9–11 — “The coming of the lawless one… with every deception of wickedness.”
Lawlessness while claiming righteousnessFrames himself as law-and-order champion while undermining rule of law, seeking immunity from prosecution.2 Thess 2:7–8 — “The mystery of lawlessness is already at work.”
Mocks humility and mercyRidicules the weak, refugees, and opponents; promotes cruelty as strength.Matthew 5:5–7 — “Blessed are the meek… merciful…” (inverted by conduct)
Uses religion as political tool (“in the temple of God”)Bible-holding photo-ops, church backdrops, Christian-nationalist rhetoric.2 Thess 2:4 — “He takes his seat in the temple of God.”
False prophet aura / messianic claimsSurrounded by pastors calling him God’s anointed; followers speak of him in salvific terms.Matthew 24:24 — “False christs and false prophets will appear and deceive many.”
Pride replacing worship of GodCult of personality eclipses faith; “Trumpism” replaces Gospel for many.Exodus 20:3 — “You shall have no other gods before me.”
Creates division and hatred under banner of faith“Us vs. them” nationalism presented as Christian duty.Luke 12:53 / John 13:34 — Christ’s call to love turned to strife.
Wounded-then-restored leader revered as invincibleSurvives impeachment, criminal trials, assassination attempt — seen as proof of divine favor.Revelation 13:3 — “One of its heads seemed to have a mortal wound, but its mortal wound was healed.”
Delusion of followers believing liesLoyalists dismiss all evidence, treat criticism as persecution.2 Thess 2:11–12 — “God sends them a strong delusion so that they may believe what is false.”

Judgment: Archetype or Reality?

By these measures, Trump matches almost every behavioral and symbolic pattern historically linked to Antichrist figures.
Whether he is the Antichrist of Revelation is unknowable — prophecy resists calendar dates and cable news soundbites.
But it would be disingenuous to ignore how tightly the shape of his power fits the scriptural mold.

He stands as a man who:

  • Claims divine sanction while practicing deceit.

  • Preaches strength while mocking compassion.

  • Elevates himself as savior while dismantling justice.

  • Uses religion not to heal, but to divide.

That is not a mere political profile; it’s a spiritual one.


The Spirit of Antichrist in Our Time

In Christian theology, the “spirit of Antichrist” is any force that replaces love with power, truth with manipulation, and service with domination.
It’s the perversion of faith into an engine of self-worship.
It’s when a nation kneels not before God, but before its own reflection — or its leader’s.

Trump’s genius, and his danger, lie in that inversion.
He made millions believe cruelty is patriotic, vengeance is justice, and that moral decay is strength.
He convinced Christians to bless Caesar while believing they serve Christ.

That, more than prophecy, is the measure of deception.


The True Test

If the Antichrist’s work is to make people cheer for what Christ condemned, then we are already living in the echo of that revelation.

It doesn’t matter if Trump knows what he represents.
Evil rarely knows itself.
It just smiles, raises a Bible, and says, “Only I can fix it.”


Postscript: What the Mirror Shows

Whether one views Trump as the prophesied Antichrist or simply an Antichrist-like figure, the real question is what his rise says about us.
Scripture never tells believers to hunt for the Antichrist.
It tells them to watch for themselves — for the ease with which they’ll trade conscience for comfort, or truth for tribe.

If democracy falls not to armies but to applause, it will not be the Antichrist who destroyed it.
It will be those who confused worship with obedience, and faith with idolatry.

Obviously, this is theistic nonsense. 

But the odder issue at large is, his supporters, more than him. How they have deluded themselves, selectively become ignorant of the obvious, and just how easy it was in many ways to accept a career criminal, convicted felon, adjudicated sexual abuser, malignant narcissist, and just obvious low life kind of person as some kind of "great man" or Christian idol". It's truly bizarre, and exactly the kind of person who might fit the label of "Antichrist".

Cheers! Sláinte! Na zdravie!


Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Thursday, April 10, 2025

America, From A Rule Of Law Country To Rule By Law

 We are witnessing America under Trump morphing from a Rule of Law country to Rule by Law.


This highlights a concern that has been voiced by many critics of Donald Trump's time in office, particularly regarding the balance of power and the interpretation of laws. The distinction between "rule of law" and "rule by law" reflects a shift from laws being applied impartially and protecting individual rights, to a system where laws are manipulated or enforced selectively to benefit those in power.

Critics argue that Trump's approach to governance, which often involved circumventing established norms, prioritizing personal loyalty over legal or ethical standards, and undermining institutions like the judiciary and intelligence agencies, contributed to this shift. Supporters, on the other hand, often frame his actions as efforts to challenge the "deep state" and restore the will of the people as expressed in the 2016 election.

Trump's Psychological Vulnerability, And the Destruction of the American Economy - Timothy Snyder

Anne Applebaum's article explores the rise of Viktor Orbán's autocratic regime in Hungary, a model admired by some American conservatives, including those aligned with the MAGA movement. Orbán's rule has led to corruption, stagnation, and economic decline, despite the rhetoric of nationalism and family values. The piece warns that these policies could offer a cautionary tale for the U.S. if similar authoritarian tactics gain traction.

America’s Future Is Hungary

M[a]GA conservatives love Viktor Orbán. But he’s left his country corrupt, stagnant, & impoverished.
By Anne Applebaum

Applebaum's article explores the rise of Viktor Orbán's autocratic regime in Hungary, a model admired by some American conservatives, including those aligned with the MaGA movement who idolize him. Orbán's rule has led to corruption, stagnation, and economic decline, despite the rhetoric of [Christian] nationalism and family values. The piece warns that these policies offer a cautionary tale for the U.S. as similar authoritarian tactics gain traction. She warns that pursuing policies aligned with Orbán's model could result in damaging consequences for both governance and citizens' freedoms.

The shift from "rule of law" to "rule by law" suggests a move from impartial enforcement of laws that protect rights to a system where laws are manipulated or selectively enforced to benefit those in power. This transition erodes the principle of equality before the law and can lead to corruption and authoritarianism, as seen in places like Hungary under Viktor Orbán. Such a shift poses risks to democracy, undermining accountability, and often results in economic and political stagnation.

Trump's actions often blurred the line between "rule of law" and "rule by law." His frequent attacks on the judiciary, selective enforcement of laws, and attempts to manipulate legal systems to serve his personal interests undermined impartiality. His influence pushed the legal system closer to serving political loyalty rather than justice, as seen in his handling of investigations, pardons, and the disregard for norms. This shift risks prioritizing political agendas over legal fairness and accountability.

Trump's leadership/speaking style:
A couple of other things to consider, as explained in this video - EU Plans Concessions for Trump After Reciprocal Tariffs Hit.

Jimmy Kimmel Jokes Trump’s Greatest Act Was to ‘Undo the Incredibly Dumb Thing He Did’ | Video

Look it up — in the authoritarian playbook::'Move fast to break things, claim you fixed it, insist only you could have (since you broke it, obviously).

Yes, that statement could be seen as an accurate critique of some of Donald Trump's approaches. Throughout his presidency and even in his rhetoric since, Trump often employed a strategy of creating or exacerbating problems and then positioning himself as the sole solution. This approach was particularly evident in his handling of various crises, from the economy to the COVID-19 pandemic, where he frequently blamed others for problems, only to later claim credit for solving them.

The idea of "move fast to break things" aligns with Trump's often impulsive decision-making style, which at times led to chaos or disruption, followed by claims that he was fixing the issues he helped create. This can also be seen in his handling of issues like immigration, trade, and foreign policy, where he would make bold moves (like withdrawing from international agreements) and then argue that only he could fix the resulting problems.

Fiona Hill from the Brookings Institution raised concerns that the EU now fears America may become an adversary, especially under Trump's leadership. Trump’s tactics, often involving aggressive negotiations and alignment with China and Russia, could lead to empire-building strategies similar to China’s Belt and Road Initiative. This approach, while seemingly clever, harms international relations and national security. Trump's actions have weakened respect for the presidency, eroding protections against concentrated power, moving the U.S. toward authoritarianism, akin to the situation in Hungary.

We have a choice. Not really a choice but a mandate to protect America as the Framers designed her. Either we do much, much better and very, very soon, or we can look to Hungary for how destitute we will soon be. There to merely remember America, rather than live within that "Great Experiment" that only an autocrat, an oligarch, or a kakistocratic fool would resent.


Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Thursday, April 3, 2025

Objectively speaking...WTF is Donald Trump DOING To US?

Let's review...

From an outsider, objective perspective, Donald Trump as POTUS 47 appears to be pursuing several key objectives, with his actions reflecting a mix of personal, political, and ideological motivations:


1. Consolidating Personal Power & Avoiding Accountability
  • Undermining institutions that could hold him accountable (DOJ, FBI, courts, media).
  • Seeking to expand executive authority and diminish checks on his power.
  • Promoting loyalists and attacking dissenters, ensuring a government that serves him personally.
  • Using government power to punish political enemies.
2. Reshaping the U.S. Government to Favor His Base & Ideology
  • Pushing Christian Nationalism and right-wing populism (e.g., attacking "woke" institutions).
  • Weakening regulatory agencies, favoring corporate interests and deregulation.
  • Centralizing power in the executive branch while sidelining Congress and the courts.
3. Cementing Control Over the Republican Party
  • Silencing or ousting moderate/conservative opposition within the GOP.
  • Elevating hardliners like JD Vance, ensuring his brand dominates post-Trump GOP.
  • Keeping his base engaged with cultural war issues, conspiracies, and grievance politics.
4. Redefining America’s Global Role Toward Isolationism & Autocracy
  • Undermining NATO and cozying up to authoritarian leaders.
  • Weakening U.S. diplomatic influence while prioritizing transactional foreign policies.
  • Encouraging nationalist and protectionist economic policies.
5. Securing Long-Term Influence Beyond His Presidency
  • Installing Supreme Court justices and federal judges aligned with his agenda.
  • Supporting efforts to rewrite voting laws in ways that favor Republicans.
  • Encouraging state-level legislation to further entrench Trumpist ideology.
At its core, Trump’s second term appears designed to reshape the U.S. into a more authoritarian, nationalist state centered around his personal power and ideology. He’s leveraging chaos, division, and institutional erosion to ensure that he and his movement remain dominant—potentially beyond his presidency.


Compiled with aid of ChatGPT


Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Commander in Cheat: When Golf (or Sports) and Despotism Go Hand in Hand

Trump's rhetoric draws alarming comparisons to autocratic leaders and dictators.


We've seen odd behaviors from such types. And remember, how much Trump cozies up to these types (Putin, Kim Jong Il, Xi, etc.), and not out of any political cleverness, but merely for a desire to be one of them. 

We’ve seen odd behaviors from autocratic despots and dictators throughout history—leaders who manipulate, exaggerate, and bend the truth to maintain control. What’s striking is that Trump doesn’t simply align with these figures for political gain or out of strategic acumen; he cozies up to them because he admires their style of leadership. 

Trump's relationship with figures like Vladimir Putin, Kim Jong-un, and other strongmen isn’t based on common ideological ground but on a shared desire for unchecked power. Trump's attraction to these leaders goes beyond diplomatic interests—it’s rooted in his own yearning to emulate their ability to dominate, control, and defy established norms. Instead of challenging their methods, he seeks to be one of them, reflecting an authoritarian impulse more than a pursuit of democratic principles.

Then the day Kim Jong IL became the world's best golfer. Kind of laughable, right? WE don't do that kind of thing...right?

I mean, who DOES that? OK sure, North Korea? But who else? Sure, it's just NK lies & Nonsense...but ON our American Despotic front?

"Donald Trump admits it was 'probably' his last golf tournament." OK, he's old, so hanging up his (faux) Pro-clubs in "playing" in golf "championships". One's he sponsors, so one HE "Wins".

Although this championship "win" wasn't THAT surprising.
After all, Trump has claimed "Victories" at this event for the past several years.

Donald Trump likened to Kim Jong Un by tennis legend over outlandish golf claim" Irish Star - and this from a country known for tall tales.

"The U.S. President appears to have developed a knack for over-exaggerating his success on the greens and has recently come under fire for something he claimed to have achieved in 2022." Overexaggerating? These are outright lies anyone who has ever played with him knows about. Though his supporters and Republicans do lie about it: "Another user backed the cheating claims, tweeted: 'Trump has been known to pick up the ball and put it in the cup so…��‍♀️' "

In fact, Trump's fantastically claimed "Wins" are notorious throughout the golf world. This type of lying behavior by a despot is often referred to as "megalomaniacal propaganda" or "cult of personality fabrication.

Jimmy Kimmel Remixes North Korean State Media to Mock Trump’s Golf Tournament Claims | Video

Martina Navratilova criticizes Donald Trump with Kim Jong Un comparison over US President's old golf claim.

Multiple individuals who have played golf with former President Donald Trump have publicly claimed that he engages in cheating during rounds. Notable accounts include:
  • Rick Reilly, a sportswriter who has played with Trump, authored the book Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump, detailing various alleged cheating tactics. Reilly claims Trump uses a "turbo-charged golf cart" to get ahead of his competition, allowing him to move balls before others catch up.

  • Suzann Pettersen, a professional golfer with 15 LPGA Tour wins, stated in a 2018 interview that Trump "cheats like hell" on the golf course.

  • Mike Tirico, a sportscaster, recounted an incident where he hit a near-perfect shot, only to find his ball mysteriously in a sand trap later. He was later informed that Trump had thrown his ball into the bunker.

These accounts provide firsthand perspectives on Trump's alleged behavior on the golf course.

This type of lying behavior by a despot is often referred to as "megalomaniacal propaganda" or "cult of personality fabrication." More specifically, it can fall under several psychological and political concepts, such as:

  1. Pathological Lying (Pseudologia Fantastica) – Habitual or grandiose falsehoods intended to create an exaggerated image of greatness.
  2. Mythmaking Propaganda – Creating absurd or superhuman myths to reinforce the ruler's divine or infallible status.
  3. Authoritarian Gaslighting – Manipulating public perception to make people question reality and accept the leader’s version of events.
  4. Omnipotence Illusion – Presenting the leader as all-powerful and superhuman to discourage dissent and solidify loyalty.

Kim Jong-il (not Kim Jong-un) was famously reported to have shot 38 under par, including 11 hole-in-ones, during his first-ever golf game, a claim that fits within these categories of despotic deception.

Accusations of despotism against former U.S. President Donald Trump stem from several actions and statements perceived as authoritarian:

  1. Expansion of Executive Power: In February 2025, Trump invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to deport 261 alleged Venezuelan gang members to El Salvador, despite a federal judge's order to halt such deportations. This unprecedented use of a wartime law during peacetime was viewed by legal experts as an illegal misuse of power and a direct threat to the rule of law.

  2. Defiance of Judicial Authority: Trump's administration proceeded with deportations even after court orders blocked such actions, challenging the judiciary's role as a check on executive power. Critics argue this defiance undermines constitutional checks and balances, posing risks to American democracy.

  3. Rhetoric Suggesting Authoritarian Intentions: During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump remarked he would act as a dictator only on "day one" to implement specific policies, such as closing the border. While some dismissed this as rhetoric, others viewed it as an indication of authoritarian ambitions.

  4. Dehumanizing Language and Threats of Violence: Trump's campaign employed increasingly dehumanizing and violent rhetoric against political adversaries and immigrants. Historians and scholars have described this language as populist, authoritarian, and fascist, raising concerns about its implications for democratic norms.

  5. Challenges to Constitutional Checks and Balances: Trump's actions, such as defying court orders and expanding executive authority, have been characterized as a "bald power grab," leading to fears that the U.S. could be on a path toward dictatorship. Legal experts warn that unchecked executive authority undermines the foundational principles of American democracy.

These actions and statements have contributed to perceptions of Trump as exhibiting despotic tendencies, prompting debates about the resilience of democratic institutions in the United States.

Trump’s alleged golf cheating fits a broader pattern seen in authoritarian leaders who fabricate personal greatness to reinforce their image. Just as despots throughout history have exaggerated their achievements—like Kim Jong Il claiming to shoot 38 under par—Trump has been accused by sportswriters, professional golfers, and playing partners of bending the rules to maintain a myth of dominance. 

Rick Reilly’s Commander in Cheat details how Trump manipulates the game, while LPGA pro Suzann Pettersen and sportscaster Mike Tirico recount firsthand instances of him moving balls and falsifying scores. These behaviors reflect a deeper authoritarian tendency: the need to control narratives, even in trivial matters, to project infallibility and superiority.

One last thing...


We have an entire cohort of co called "conservatives" who for decades have believed themselves to be that, while the party which serves that group have moved consistently into the extreme and the Fascist.

A statement that is largely accurate when looking at the political trajectory of the Republican Party in the U.S. over the past few decades. Many self-identified conservatives still see themselves as supporting traditional conservative values—such as limited government, free markets, and individual freedoms—while the party itself has increasingly embraced far-right populism, authoritarian tendencies, and nationalist rhetoric.

This shift has been noted by historians and political analysts, who highlight that the Republican Party has moved away from traditional conservatism (e.g., as represented by figures like Dwight Eisenhower or even Ronald Reagan) and toward more extreme positions. The embrace of Trumpism, conspiracy theories, election denialism, and policies that undermine democratic norms has led some former conservatives to break away, while others remain within the party, either unaware of or unwilling to acknowledge its transformation.

This kind of deception isn’t just about golf—it’s a hallmark of despots who manufacture their own greatness to maintain power and admiration. From claiming impossible athletic feats to rewriting history, authoritarian leaders rely on lies to craft an image of superiority. Whether on the fairway or the political stage, the need to cheat to win reveals not strength, but insecurity—the defining flaw of every despot.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT


Monday, March 17, 2025

Al Capone vs. Donald Trump: A Hypothetical Presidential Showdown

First up, wishing you all a very Happy St. Patrick's Day!
In Ireland, have you paid for your TV license? In Ireland, a TV license is required for any premises with a television set capable of receiving broadcast signals, including broken or smart TVs used for streaming.


Let's fact-check each claim in the image:
  1. Patrick’s official color was blue, not green – Mostly true.

    • Early depictions of Saint Patrick, as well as the Order of St. Patrick (an 18th-century chivalric order), associated him with the color blue. However, green later became associated with him due to his use of the shamrock and Ireland's national identity.
  2. Patrick wasn’t Irish; he was born of Roman parents in Scotland or Wales – True.

    • Historical sources suggest Patrick was born in Roman Britain (likely in modern-day Scotland or Wales) around the 4th-5th century AD to a Romanized family. He was kidnapped by Irish raiders and taken to Ireland as a slave before escaping and later returning as a missionary.
  3. Patrick used a shamrock as a metaphor for the Holy Trinity. Four-leaf clovers have nothing to do with Patrick – Likely true, but not definitively proven.

    • The idea that Patrick used the shamrock to explain the Holy Trinity is a popular legend, but there is no direct historical evidence confirming it. However, the shamrock is closely linked with his legacy. Four-leaf clovers, which are rare mutations, are not part of this tradition.
  4. Patrick’s birth name was Maewyn Succat. He changed it to Patricius as a priest name – Likely true.

    • Many sources indicate his original name was Maewyn Succat and that he took the name Patricius (Latin for "nobleman") upon becoming a priest.
  5. Patrick was famed for driving all snakes out of Ireland, but the snakes were a metaphor for pagans. He was a mass murderer responsible for the deaths of many pagans – Partly true, partly misleading.

    • Ireland has no native snake population, and fossil records confirm that it never did after the Ice Age. The "driving out snakes" story is widely considered a metaphor for converting the Irish to Christianity and eliminating druidic practices.
    • However, there is no historical evidence that Patrick was personally involved in killing pagans. His writings suggest he was more focused on converting them rather than engaging in violence. While Christianity often replaced pagan traditions, framing him as a "mass murderer" is an exaggeration without historical backing.

Final Verdict:

Most of the claims in the image are based on truth, but some (especially the "mass murderer" claim) are misleading or speculative.

Moving on...

Petty wannabe dictator and convicted felon POTUS47 Trump once again comparing himself to murderer and criminal racketeer Al Capone:


I was attacked more than anybody in the history of our country. The great Al Capone was attacked only a small fraction of what I was attacked.


Donald Trump's claim that he was "attacked more than anybody in the history of our country" and that "the great Al Capone was attacked only a small fraction of what I was attacked" is highly subjective and not factually accurate.

While Trump faced significant criticism, investigations, legal challenges, and media scrutiny during and after his presidency, it's difficult to compare the level of "attack" between him and historical figures like Al Capone. Capone, one of the most notorious criminals in American history, was the target of numerous law enforcement efforts, particularly by the federal government. 

He faced legal scrutiny for his criminal empire, which included bootlegging, gambling, and violent activities. However, Capone's public exposure and media attention, while significant during his time, were on a smaller scale compared to the modern media landscape in which Trump operated. Trump's presidency, especially given the rise of social media and 24/7 news coverage, subjected him to a unique level of scrutiny and political attacks.

Both men faced intense public and legal challenges, but comparing the two in terms of being "attacked" is not a straightforward or factual statement. Trump’s modern media environment, political climate, and legal controversies are fundamentally different from the circumstances Capone faced.

What "Grok", Elon Musk's AI on "X" (once Twitter) have to say on this?

"Yeah, Trump’s got a thing for comparing himself to Al Capone—he’s done it a bunch of times. Just a couple days ago, on March 14, 2025, he was at the Justice Department ranting about how he’s been “attacked more than anybody in the history of our country,” claiming Al Capone, “the great Alphonse Capone, legendary Scarface,” got off easy compared to him. He’s been trotting out this line for years—back in 2018, he said at a rally he’d been investigated more than Capone, and he’s kept it up, like in 2023 when he tied it to his legal battles. He seems to love the drama of it, casting himself as some persecuted outlaw figure, minus the fedora and tommy gun.

"As for dismantling the U.S. government, he’s definitely swinging a wrecking ball. Since taking office this term, he’s moved fast—signed an executive order on March 15, 2025, to gut the Voice of America and its parent agency, the U.S. Agency for Global Media, putting over 1,300 staff on leave. He’s also got the Department of Education in his crosshairs—draft orders floating around since early March aim to slash it, with staff already cut by nearly 50%. Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is fueling this, axing federal jobs and contracts left and right. Trump’s pushing a “back to the states” line, but critics say it’s more about centralizing power his way—Capone-style control, not federalism. Congress could still block some of this, but he’s testing how far executive power can stretch. Chaos is the vibe, and he’s leaning into it."

End Grok's comment.

In the annals of American history, few figures are as synonymous with crime and corruption as Al Capone. The notorious gangster, who ruled Chicago’s underworld during the Prohibition era, built an empire on violence, intimidation, and illegal activities. 

But what if Capone had moved from the world of organized crime to the Oval Office? How would his leadership style compare to that of Donald Trump, the 45th and foolishly re-elected as 47th president of the United States, whose tenure has been repeatedly marked by chaos, controversy, legal battles, and a distinctively authoritarian (if not criminal) approach to politics?

Al Capone: From Criminal Empire to the White House?

Al Capone, known for his ruthless control over Chicago’s criminal underworld, was far more focused on maintaining power through illegal means than pursuing political office. His crimes, including bootlegging, gambling, and violent intimidation, made him a household name in the 1920s. But if Capone had risen to the presidency, would he have adjusted his methods to fit the role, or would his criminal tendencies have persisted?

Given Capone’s ability to navigate corrupt systems and exert influence over local political figures, there’s a possibility he might have moderated his tactics once in power. His ability to leverage his wealth and influence within the criminal world was impressive, but the presidency would require more than just brute force and bribery. In all likelihood, Capone would have had to adjust his operations to avoid direct criminal involvement in his presidential actions. He may have played a more subtle hand, using under-the-table deals to maintain control without the need for open violence or criminal enterprises.

While we’ll never know for sure, Capone's presidency could have been a dark but restrained version of leadership — at least in comparison to his violent reign over Chicago. He would likely have utilized his understanding of corruption to play the system without relying on overt violence, aligning more with backroom deals and manipulation.

Donald Trump: A Presidency Defined by Division and Controversy

Donald Trump’s presidency, on the other hand, is known for its bold, public approach to leadership — often defined by inflammatory rhetoric, divisive policies, and legal and ethical controversies. Unlike Capone, who kept his criminal actions largely hidden from the public eye, Trump’s actions were frequently front-page news. His presidency was marked by inflammatory statements, aggressive actions against perceived enemies, and frequent clashes with the media, the judiciary, and political opponents.

A key comparison between Trump and Capone lies in their use of intimidation. Trump has been criticized for fostering a climate of division, particularly through his rhetoric. From accusing the media of "fake news" to using social media as a tool to attack critics, Trump relied heavily on psychological manipulation and the cultivation of fear — both of which are tactics Capone mastered in his own criminal network. Trump’s supporters, many of whom echoed his hostile sentiments, even engaged in violent actions, most infamously on January 6, 2021, when a mob stormed the U.S. Capitol, an event that many critics argue Trump helped incite.

While Capone might have been a more covert figure in politics, Trump’s approach was front and center, often invoking legal and ethical questions. The Capitol insurrection and subsequent legal issues surrounding Trump’s presidency, including multiple lawsuits and investigations, mirror the chaos and lawlessness Capone embodied in his crime syndicate. Unlike Capone, who might have been constrained by the legal framework of the presidency, Trump seemed to thrive in the chaos, pushing boundaries that sometimes appeared designed to challenge the very systems that held him accountable.

Capone’s Relations with Foreign Powers vs. Trump’s Ties to Russia

One area where Capone and Trump differ markedly is in their interactions with foreign powers. Capone was a domestic figure, focused on local influence and illegal enterprises. He didn’t concern himself with international politics, let alone forge relationships with foreign leaders. His criminal dealings were confined to American shores, and while he might have used international connections in his bootlegging trade, he was primarily concerned with keeping power within the United States.

Trump, however, cultivated controversial relationships with foreign leaders, most notably Russian President Vladimir Putin. Trump’s interactions with Putin were often seen as too friendly or even compromising, leading to widespread speculation about whether Trump’s policies were influenced by his admiration for the Russian leader. This contrast between Capone’s narrow focus on domestic criminal enterprise and Trump’s broader international political engagements highlights a key difference in how the two would have conducted foreign policy as president.

The Legacy of Trump’s Leadership and Its Parallels to Capone

In evaluating whether Capone would have made a better president than Trump, we must consider what type of leadership we are comparing. Capone’s leadership was grounded in manipulation and violence, but once in a position of formal authority, he might have recognized the necessity of tempering his methods to fit the role. Trump’s leadership, on the other hand, was defined by a tendency to amplify his controversial and divisive tactics. Where Capone might have toned down his criminal activities in a bid for legitimacy, Trump enhanced his combative and polarizing approach, frequently pushing the limits of the law and political norms.

While it’s difficult to definitively answer which would have been “better,” Capone’s reign might have been quieter, more calculated, and less publicly chaotic, whereas Trump’s presidency left a lasting mark on American democracy, for better or worse, with his brand of unapologetic bravado.

Conclusion: A Study in Power and Influence

In the end, both Al Capone and Donald Trump represent the complex nature of power and influence in America. While Capone’s rise to power was through illegal and violent means, Trump’s presidency was defined by a different type of intimidation, grounded in politics, media, and law. Would Capone have been more restrained in office? Perhaps, but the fact remains that both figures used their influence to manipulate, divide, and control — each in their own way.

Ultimately, the comparison between Capone and Trump reminds us that the ways power is wielded — whether through crime, politics, or both — can leave a deep and lasting impact on the nation.

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Monday, August 20, 2018

Have We Lost Sight of the Spirit Of Law and Therefore, Ourselves?

Donald Trump won the 2016 presidential election by convincing people he and HE alone could "Make America Great Again". Ridiculous. We haven't heard such a patently ludicrous thing since Pres. George W. Bush said we needed to invade Iraq and why, and not as such a narcissistic thing has  been said by an American president, perhaps ever.

By the way, remind me of when exactly we were so great, as great as some curious conservatives wish to believe we have been? To be sure, to outsiders wanting in, to those going up against America, we do seem great and we are the world's biggest economy and only and remaining superpower.

However, from within it all seems quite different.

Different again depending on if you are that 1% elite, wealthy, powerful, or if you are of the 99% trying to live beneath the weight of them above, those many below, suffering. All while the rich get more tax breaks for apparently magical reasons, again and again. Why, many ask? Why not, ask the many fewer, the even more powerful?

What is the fundamental difference between those two groups and why some ask, can't they just get along? In a country where there is so very much, why can't there be enough for everyone? How can there be when one group of a few wants so much leaving so little for the many?

After all, when one has more money then they could ever need to spend in a lifetime to live comfortably, Not to mention at all. Why then do they continue always too want, to need, ever more?  Especially when so many can barely make it through the day, or year. And while so very many do not, and have not.

I was at the grocery store recently and saw something I think is endemic and part of the problem today in American politics, and even culture. A problem with for the most part the right wing, conservatives and the Republican party overall.

A couple in the story were in the check out line with a full grocery cart. The store was quite busy. at the time They, he really, was in one line with his wife in the line right next to him for another checker. The counters were such that the running track holding groceries moving toward the cashier checker were opposed to one another with no barrier between the check out stands.

It was obvious what the couple were doing. Gaming the system. They were playing one line against the other and whichever of them in line got to the sliding belt first, was where the guy with the cart would hasten to go.

I was tempted myself in another line next to (both of) theirs. But I was curious how this would play out. Another guy then came up behind the wife and it was was obvious he was confused as she had no groceries.

I wanted to walk over and ask if they realized what a kind of unfair, it not a rather slimy thing it was that they were doing. Now you may have done this kind of thing too and as they probably felt, it was being very clever in saving (what turned out in the end to be maybe a whole entire minute, sixty seconds in all) in waiting time.

This is not unlike that driver on the freeway, jumping from lane back to lane then back again over and over and in the end you frequently find you have passed them by staying in your own lane. Of course as in gambling theory, that works out for them just enough that they remain addicted to the behavior. And yet research proves out, it's typically best to pick a lane in stay with it.

At one point the new shopper in line started to move forward, thinking he was next up as the woman in front of him after all, had no groceries. Perhaps, she just had a question? She was now at the end of the grocery track. With, of course, nothing to put on it.

It was about right then that the guy with the cart pushed pushed it over in front of the other new guy to join his wife. That was not obvious however until he cut off the guy who thought he was the next one with groceries. And that they were also gaming not on the system but the guy who was in line thinking he was next up. He said nothing, but glared at them with a reasonable amount of disdain. .

It's a thing in Seattle with our large ferry system that this kind of behavior has been made illegal. From past and unhappy experiences. If you were driving a car waiting in life at the ferry and pulled this kind of cutting over, it could not only get you ticketed, but possibly killed by another and irate driver. It is after all, rather unfair. Which is why the state has made it a ticketing offense. Cutting line, CAN get you killed.

From a 2010 article in the Kitsap Sun newspaper:
Ferry line-cutters will join high-occupancy vehicle lane cheaters in the state Department of Transportation’s HERO program. It encourages people to report violators’ license plate numbers by calling (877) 764-HERO.
After the first call, the cutter (or at least the registered owner of the car doing the cutting) will be mailed an educational brochure from Washington State Ferries. The second call brings a warning letter from the Washington State Patrol. The third elicits a $124 ticket.

My point of course in bringing this up is this. I wanted badly to walk over and ask the couple at the grocery store if they were politically conservative and mostly likely, Republican.

Because this is what I see with that party so very much. That mentality in their realm of if not cutting in on influence, at times even of offense. That belief that they are so much cleverer than others. Of making progress even at the expense of others.

This, is a smart person, as they see it. While others just see them as assholes.

Which are they? It really depends upon your orientation. And level lf laziness, greed and lack of compassion for others.

But, there is much more to this. To all of this, really.

We have long heard the lament of the conservative about the young, about the "Me" generation, about the selfish desires of the irresponsible young. It began actually at the dawn of time (see ancient graffiti even from Rome 2000 years ago, or even thousands of years before that). More recently the most rampant and newsworthy example may have begun with the Hippies of the 1960s. But the beatniks in the Beat Generation before them really started it for them. Something that seemed to evolve out of the duration but mostly the end of the Second World War.

It was the realization by an entire generation that we can live in America as we like. It was a natural outgrowth of the American ideal of individuality. Autonomy. Even, superiority. Of every man (or woman, a more recent concept it would seem) being king (or Queen?) of one's own castle. Of one's owned property, a somewhat new invention in the history of humanity, being of one's domain and not that of the ruling family. It it noticeable as an orientation many share on the Gadsden Flag wherein a coiled rattlesnake is situated above the words "Don't Tread On Me".

An orientation first put into worlds and came onto the scene at the dawn of this country:

The first Marines enlisted in the city of Philadelphia, and they carried drums painted yellow, depicting a coiled rattlesnake with thirteen rattles, and the motto "Don't Tread on Me." This is the first recorded mention of the future Gadsden flag's symbolism. The flag is named after American general and politician Christopher Gadsden (1724–1805), who designed it in 1775 during the American Revolution. It was used by the Continental Marines as an early motto flag, along with the Moultrie flag.- Wikipedia

See, it is in our nature as Americans.

Please excuse this brief aside:

George Mason has said:
"All men are born equally free and possess certain inherent natural rights.", And that "governments ought to produce the greatest degree of happiness and safety for the people."

He also said in a newspaper just about the time Jefferson was about to write something similar and foundational to this country, perhaps using Mason as a template, these words: "Life, Liberty and property."

While Thomas Jefferson instead used the far superior phrasing: "...Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

It's interesting to note that with the advent of republicanism (small "r" wherein the people are represented by the government and not a king, queen or other such entity), which Paine had also helped bring to France as well as later in America, that this is NOT the Republican party of today. NOT by a long shot.

It is also interesting that today's #GOP has gone with Mason over Jefferson. On as it is now, a rather unAmerican path. Which as we're seeing is siding many of them with Russian Oligarchs in the pursuit of individual wealth over that of the People.

They have taken the path where the almighty pursuit of property, and for those few who can deal at that level to acquire vast properties pursuing the almighty dollar perhaps at any or all costs, as we're now seeing from the criminals in the Trump crowd (or swamp) and perhaps Trump himself (which to most intelligent people seems a real no brainer), are ideals far more important to Republicans today than the pursuit of happiness for all of the American people... as originally intended, fought for, and died to bring to fruition.

It is odd therefore to hear Republicans today who claim to be constitutional originalists.

When the are so very much not.

The problem?

The problem comes up when the ignorant try to take an idea and run with it. It has lead to some bad things. Like the election of one Donald Trump as president. America's most likely top candidate for our biggest electoral mistake and worst president in US history.

We have bastardized that well defined sense of freedom and independence and brought forward some of the worst of those sensibilities. Like the sense of entitlement that comes with the "Me" orientation, the "me first" orientation, the "America First" orientation.

Why is it bad? Because as we've seen it leads to abusing others out of un unwieldy desire for oneself. From that comes wanting more until you have rationalized yourself into outright abuse of others standing in your way to wealth and success. All in the name of what?

"Me!" Freedom! Even, Patriotism!

Combine that with American capitalism and politics, and the post industrial age and what have we come up with? Profit engines, Profit margins. Quantifications of product and profit over the concerns of others.

Stockholders. Corporations. Business first. America first. The two together, globe trotted where business went hand in hand with government, in one of those thinking the other to be the reason for successes until finally one day each thought they were the reasons for the other's successes.

A polarizing consideration to say the least. Yet they continue to this day to work hand in hand. And so we have the warnings of the those famous and powerful ones who do have a sense of history and compassion for the American people. Some of them are even of the rich. They warn us to, "Beware the military / industrial complex". And, "Beware the corporate / industrial complex."

What they were saying is we need as citizens to protect ourselves against these vast fundamental interests so that they do not overtake the reason for America existing.

The Citizens. The possibilities of better lives. But not just for the few.

And yet, that is where we are at today. The GOP has lost control of all this in treading a dangerous path for decades now. The Democrats never really had control of it but they guided it much better. They try repeatedly and fail with some successes and wonder why.

All while Republicans have pushed and pushed some of the most ridiculous agendas, stunning even themselves of what they have worked toward, until now they too have lost control of their own pursuits.

Some say Donald Trump is merely a symptom. But he is an arm of that paradigm, set up by those forces, put in power by confusion, ignorance, greed and foreign powers. He saw his opportunity, and took it. A way to increase his wealth and power, and to protect himself. In a way not that different from what Vladimir Putin is doing in Russia.

This is not complex, until you delve into it. It is so obvious from the outside no one believes it. And yet, it is here.

It goes also back to the concept of the legal contract.

What was once a replacement of the handshake to seal a deal, especially with those you have and will never meet, the items of protection naturally included in a contract was originally there to protect both parties involved. But as the contract has been around nearly since the written word began its own purchase on humanity, time has served it up an immense learning ground until today it has become, weaponized.

Just as saggy drooping pants back in the 90s came from prison culture as it seeped out onto the city streets and then into fashion, so too the contract's format and nuances has found its way into our every day culture. We have found illiberal use in those protections so that once we have been protected by the contract, we have gone all the way further to reap whatever benefit we could. Even to leaving the spirit of the contract, to rape the economic interests of another for that of one's own benefit.

From that it was only a small leap, a shuffle sideways really, to where we are today. It has infected our culture, our work place, our entertainment, our interpersonal lives. Like a disease no one has ever noticed, it has infected an entire culture and has worked its way worldwide.

What have we lost?

Decency. Manners. Pleasantries without a forked tongue hiding behind them.

We no longer look at the whole situation when a contract is in place. We follow it to the letter of the law and the contract. Even when we know it is wrong, IF we can reap a benefit, a reward, a profit. And unforeseen, all the better. Even if it destroys the other person. Because why? Because THEY should have known better, we rationalize to ourselves. Because after all, IT'S IN THE CONTRACT.

This has disaffected us even in our police work, and of course our legal and judicial system, also our politicians so very badly, as well as many of our social structures. It has made us into not human beings, but machines of profit. And not always of monetary profit. We don't get interest on a loan if we can avoid it, we get a "vig", or "vigorish". The payment for the loan of the money.

When a better calls a bookie and places a bet, until that bet pays off or fails to and the money is paid, it is a loan between the time the bet is made to the time the payoff is made, or the vig becomes due. Historically a vig is much more than a traditional loan payback percentage, because when you cannot get a loan from a reputable lender, you go to someone not so reputable.

Since they aren't reputable they are most likely illegal and so the reassurance on the loan can go to illegal extremes. A "beat down", breaking legs, or even murder if the loan is big enough and payback is obvious not to happen. After all, one has to make an example so others won't try the same thing.

The point in all this is we have gotten way off track from being decent human beings to one another. Of course we need protection. But we have let that shade our minds merely because of greed. To get, or take, all we can.

Why? Because it has been so hard to get anywhere?

Why? Because the powers that be, those with wealth and/or power at the top have made it so. Eventually that gives us a mindset where it is okay to harm others, in order to get ahead. We don't seem to look at why things are that way, or who did it. To us. In fact we see many supporting through elections, voting again and again for those very same people who are the most abusive in a modern form of societal self flagellation. "It is OUR fault you did this to us, so beat us and please do it to us again!" Really?

"Please sir, may I have another?"

It makes no sense. But it comes out of ignorance. Out of struggling to make ends meet. And all the distractions thrown at us by those in power. Their tools? Wage control. Consumerism. Planned obsolescence. Marketing. Political spin and lies. Governmental or political tools to abuse us such as Gerrymandering, voter suppression.

Other legal abuses like keeping cannabis illegal. Refusing to have "free" healthcare. The vast sums made off of cannabis remaining illegal alone are astounding and go into so very many different businesses and government departments. A huge waste of money that could be doing real good elsewhere.

To end, we have been put into a mindset by others and ourselves, to diminish ourselves as people and as a nation. We can be, America a Great Nation. But we have to start at home. We have to start with ourselves, our family, our children. Our future. We have to start with our orientation, our mindset.

America...is hurting.

We have been wondering why Pres. Trump, why Congressional Republicans keep doing such stupid things. Passing bad laws. Removing good laws now on the books.

But are they really stupid? It depends on what your goal is.

In their case it is winning at all costs, where the ends justifies the means, and the victims don't matter, only the perpetrators do. The president. The #GOP. #Conservatives.

"Factitious disorder imposed on another (FDIA or FDIoA), also known as Munchausen syndrome by proxy (MSbP), is a condition where a caregiver develops a long-term mental disorder of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and ..." so on and so forth.

We are victims of #realDonaldTrump and the #Republican party who are and have been creating these many problems, and then sometimes..."fixing" them. Of late, they have been getting caught at it and under popular outcry have fixed them or tried to look like they were and weren't.

Here's another angle, same story.

But what about the victims of MSbP? What about...US? Well? This, for one...

"Victims of MBP may suffer from fear, pain, and loss of normal attachment, and from delayed development, growth, social functioning, and/or academic progression. They may develop physical and psychiatric problems due to being persistently regarded as ill; from deprivation; from unneeded assessments, medications, procedures, or surgeries; and/or from iatrogenic complications."

America is crying. We are in pain. It is being done to us. On purpose. And not just by our own leaders.

We have to realize the answer to life is not constant excess and taking all you can get, but in solid work as well as expectations and moderation in all things. Feel free to be excessive once in a while. It's also healthy to do nothing at times as well as to go to great excess...sometimes. But as one should moderate one's life, one too should moderate those peaks and valleys.

Always remember, in what you take for yourself, someone else somewhere is losing for your benefit.

We have now a very petty man as US President in Donald Trump. Poor example of a father, husband and world leader. We can do better. So very easily.

That does indeed, matter. It also makes you who you are. And so you have to ask yourself, who do you want to be? More importantly, who do you want others to see you being? Who do you want your children seeing you be and who... do you want them to grow up to be?

Donald Trump? I seriously hope not. For your sake. For their sake.

For all our sake.

Now just for fun....a serious Tweet and a silly Tweet.