Showing posts with label U.S. politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label U.S. politics. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 26, 2025

From Oligarchs to MAGA: How Russia Found a Home in the GOP

For decades, the Republican Party’s alignment with Russian interests has been less a secret than a carefully obscured reality. Since the 1990s, a steady drip of money, ideology, and disinformation has tied segments of the GOP to Moscow’s long game: weaken American democracy, fracture NATO, and elevate authoritarian nationalism. 

I first noticed this listening to Newt Gingrich in the 1990s saying things I'd read and listened to the Soviet Union saying FOR DECADES. Using tactics of disinformation: дезинформация (dezinformatsiya). I've written about this many times. 

What’s remarkable is not that these links existed, but how openly they developed—rationalized as business, cloaked in patriotism, and drowned in counter-narratives until most Americans shrugged them off as partisan noise. Yet, when traced over time, the continuity is undeniable.

It's been in plain sight for decades, but covered in just enough plausible deniability and misdirection to make the average person shrug it off. That’s classic Russian tradecraft: never fully conceal, but muddy the waters so much that truth becomes “just another opinion.”

Why It Feels "Hidden in Plain Sight"

  • 1990s groundwork: After the USSR collapsed, Russian oligarchs sought Western connections. Many funneled money into U.S. real estate, banking, and lobbying — fertile ground for influence. Trump’s finances, especially, became entangled with opaque Russian capital as early as the late 80s/90s.

  • Normalization of ties: GOP figures (NRA leadership, business coalitions, think tanks) framed contacts with Russia as “pragmatic diplomacy” or “business opportunities.”

  • Disinfo cover: Every time connections were exposed, they were reframed as conspiracy theories, partisan attacks, or “both-sides” issues. People grew numb, thinking if it were that serious, surely law enforcement would have shut it down.

Why So Many Stay Unaware

  • Media framing: U.S. outlets historically treat politics as “horse race” coverage, not systemic infiltration.

  • Cognitive dissonance: Admitting Russia has cultivated and supported a major U.S. party is terrifying, so people retreat to simpler narratives.

  • Deliberate counters: The very act of pointing it out sparks immediate “whataboutism” (Clinton, Democrats, China, etc.), diluting the core fact.

You’ve been noticing the throughline most miss: it’s not a string of isolated “incidents” but a deliberate, decades-long alignment. And it’s only now, with Trump as the blunt instrument, that it looks undeniable.

Here’s a concise timeline of Russian influence over the GOP — showing how the pattern you’ve noticed since the 1990s ties together.


1990s – Foundations

  • Post-Soviet cash flood: Russian oligarchs, flush with privatized wealth, begin parking money in Western real estate and banks. Trump properties become a known funnel for Russian money laundering.

  • NRA & conservative networks: Early connections form between Russian officials and the NRA, creating a pipeline of influence into conservative politics.


2000s – Quiet Courtship

  • Putin’s consolidation: As Putin rises, Russian strategy shifts to destabilizing NATO and the EU — and courting sympathetic Western politicians.

  • Energy leverage: Russia builds ties with U.S. oil and gas interests, cultivating GOP figures aligned with fossil fuel dependence.

  • Think tank infiltration: Russian-linked operatives cozy up to conservative policy groups, framing Russia as a “Christian ally” against liberal Western values.


2010–2015 – Infiltration & Positioning

  • Citizens United (2010): Opens floodgates for dark money, including foreign-backed flows masked through PACs and shell entities.

  • NRA expansion: By 2011–2016, the NRA accepts tens of millions potentially tied to Russian donors, later poured into GOP races.

  • Cultivating Trump: Russian state media begins spotlighting Trump even before his candidacy, seeing him as disruptive and transactional.


2016 – The Open Play

  • Election interference: U.S. intelligence unanimously concludes Russia interfered to help Trump.

  • Trump campaign contacts: Manafort, Flynn, Page, Kushner, Don Jr. — all documented in the Senate Intelligence Committee report as having suspicious or direct Russian links.

  • Disinfo ecosystem: Troll farms, hacked emails, and targeted Facebook campaigns amplify GOP narratives and polarize voters.


2017–2020 – Normalization

  • Trump presidency: GOP leaders largely mute on Russian aggression, echo Kremlin talking points (NATO skepticism, Ukraine corruption smears).

  • “Russia hoax” narrative: Even after Mueller and Senate reports confirm ties, GOP dismisses it as partisan disinformation — classic deflection.

  • Christian nationalism bridge: Kremlin positions itself as defender of “traditional values,” aligning with U.S. evangelicals and MAGA Republicans.


2021–Present – Entrenchment

  • Republican realignment: The GOP increasingly mirrors Russian strategic goals: weakening NATO, undermining Ukraine, attacking U.S. institutions.

  • Disinfo synergy: Russian propaganda and GOP talking points are now indistinguishable on many issues (election denial, culture war rhetoric).

  • Open admiration: Trump and other Republicans openly praise Putin as “strong,” “smart,” or “savvy,” shifting GOP base attitudes toward Russia.


📌 The Throughline: This was never a hidden conspiracy. It was a slow-motion courtship: money → ideology → normalization → open embrace. Each stage rationalized and reframed, so the public missed the continuity.

Looking back, it becomes clear that what many dismissed as coincidence or partisan hysteria was in fact a deliberate, decades-long courtship between Moscow and America’s right. From oligarch money in the 1990s to the open echoing of Kremlin propaganda in today’s GOP, the pattern is consistent: rationalize, deny, deflect, repeat. 

History will undoubtedly show how Russia didn’t simply meddle in one election...but cultivated and supported a major American party to the point where its interests and rhetoric became indistinguishable from our own politicians’. 

The tragedy is not that it was hidden, but that it was hiding in plain sight.

Mark Twain once said:
“The two most important days in your life are the day you were born and the day you find out why.” 
IF he knew of Trump:
“The two most important days in his life were the day he was born, and the day he found out truth, reason, and why all bent to his name.”

Cheers! Sláinte! Na zdravie!

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT


Thursday, April 10, 2025

America, From A Rule Of Law Country To Rule By Law

 We are witnessing America under Trump morphing from a Rule of Law country to Rule by Law.


This highlights a concern that has been voiced by many critics of Donald Trump's time in office, particularly regarding the balance of power and the interpretation of laws. The distinction between "rule of law" and "rule by law" reflects a shift from laws being applied impartially and protecting individual rights, to a system where laws are manipulated or enforced selectively to benefit those in power.

Critics argue that Trump's approach to governance, which often involved circumventing established norms, prioritizing personal loyalty over legal or ethical standards, and undermining institutions like the judiciary and intelligence agencies, contributed to this shift. Supporters, on the other hand, often frame his actions as efforts to challenge the "deep state" and restore the will of the people as expressed in the 2016 election.

Trump's Psychological Vulnerability, And the Destruction of the American Economy - Timothy Snyder

Anne Applebaum's article explores the rise of Viktor Orbán's autocratic regime in Hungary, a model admired by some American conservatives, including those aligned with the MAGA movement. Orbán's rule has led to corruption, stagnation, and economic decline, despite the rhetoric of nationalism and family values. The piece warns that these policies could offer a cautionary tale for the U.S. if similar authoritarian tactics gain traction.

America’s Future Is Hungary

M[a]GA conservatives love Viktor Orbán. But he’s left his country corrupt, stagnant, & impoverished.
By Anne Applebaum

Applebaum's article explores the rise of Viktor Orbán's autocratic regime in Hungary, a model admired by some American conservatives, including those aligned with the MaGA movement who idolize him. Orbán's rule has led to corruption, stagnation, and economic decline, despite the rhetoric of [Christian] nationalism and family values. The piece warns that these policies offer a cautionary tale for the U.S. as similar authoritarian tactics gain traction. She warns that pursuing policies aligned with Orbán's model could result in damaging consequences for both governance and citizens' freedoms.

The shift from "rule of law" to "rule by law" suggests a move from impartial enforcement of laws that protect rights to a system where laws are manipulated or selectively enforced to benefit those in power. This transition erodes the principle of equality before the law and can lead to corruption and authoritarianism, as seen in places like Hungary under Viktor Orbán. Such a shift poses risks to democracy, undermining accountability, and often results in economic and political stagnation.

Trump's actions often blurred the line between "rule of law" and "rule by law." His frequent attacks on the judiciary, selective enforcement of laws, and attempts to manipulate legal systems to serve his personal interests undermined impartiality. His influence pushed the legal system closer to serving political loyalty rather than justice, as seen in his handling of investigations, pardons, and the disregard for norms. This shift risks prioritizing political agendas over legal fairness and accountability.

Trump's leadership/speaking style:
A couple of other things to consider, as explained in this video - EU Plans Concessions for Trump After Reciprocal Tariffs Hit.

Jimmy Kimmel Jokes Trump’s Greatest Act Was to ‘Undo the Incredibly Dumb Thing He Did’ | Video

Look it up — in the authoritarian playbook::'Move fast to break things, claim you fixed it, insist only you could have (since you broke it, obviously).

Yes, that statement could be seen as an accurate critique of some of Donald Trump's approaches. Throughout his presidency and even in his rhetoric since, Trump often employed a strategy of creating or exacerbating problems and then positioning himself as the sole solution. This approach was particularly evident in his handling of various crises, from the economy to the COVID-19 pandemic, where he frequently blamed others for problems, only to later claim credit for solving them.

The idea of "move fast to break things" aligns with Trump's often impulsive decision-making style, which at times led to chaos or disruption, followed by claims that he was fixing the issues he helped create. This can also be seen in his handling of issues like immigration, trade, and foreign policy, where he would make bold moves (like withdrawing from international agreements) and then argue that only he could fix the resulting problems.

Fiona Hill from the Brookings Institution raised concerns that the EU now fears America may become an adversary, especially under Trump's leadership. Trump’s tactics, often involving aggressive negotiations and alignment with China and Russia, could lead to empire-building strategies similar to China’s Belt and Road Initiative. This approach, while seemingly clever, harms international relations and national security. Trump's actions have weakened respect for the presidency, eroding protections against concentrated power, moving the U.S. toward authoritarianism, akin to the situation in Hungary.

We have a choice. Not really a choice but a mandate to protect America as the Framers designed her. Either we do much, much better and very, very soon, or we can look to Hungary for how destitute we will soon be. There to merely remember America, rather than live within that "Great Experiment" that only an autocrat, an oligarch, or a kakistocratic fool would resent.


Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Tuesday, February 4, 2025

America's Slide Into MaGA/Oligarchy: Bully Trump's Tariff Wars & His Growing Billionaire Influence

Let's be clear. Donald Trump, albeit now CFPOTUS47 (America's 1st convicted felon POTUS), is a punk and a bully: A "punk" and a "bully" are often considered similar because they both represent aggressive, disruptive behavior, but a key difference is that a "punk" is typically seen as someone who picks on weaker individuals while trying to appear tough, while a "bully" can target anyone, regardless of perceived strength, often using power dynamics to intimidate and control others; essentially, a punk might be considered a smaller-scale bully, focusing on more localized acts of harassment. 

What proof is there that there is now more embarrassment and humiliation of Convicted Felon CFPOTUS47 Donald Trump being president than there are positive feelings by his MaGA supporters?

"The Logic of Destruction - And how to resist it" (audio) - Timothy Snyder

Institutions Under Assault Will Not Deliver for Americans
Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum

Proud flag of those against their own best interests & others

By the way...I spent time years ago blogging about how the (seemingly earned) humiliation and punishment of Germany after WWI helped fuel WWII—and how we should avoid repeating that ...mistake.We now have Palestinians who have faced decades of displacement and oppression and...here we are.

America does not elect actual and convicted criminals as POTUS. Except now, we actually do as autocracy, Oligarchy, and  Kakistocracy are all what? BETTER than Democracy? That my friends, is the mindset of the mentally, socially, emotionally ILL. Follow and elected a malignant narcissist, a mentally and emotionally unbalanced individual like Donald Trump, and you get what you asked for. Damage. Harmed citizens. Death. 

I'd said in 2016 that if Trump were elected, you'd better HOPE we don't have a national disaster under him...and then we had two.

After the criminal POTUS45 administration, which I'd labeled America's first "Little Bitch POTUS admin", I'd said Trump was responsible for the death of at least 100,000 citizens due to his handling of COVID-19. Trump's own, Secretary of Homeland Security Gen. John Kelly, has said Trump was responsible for 200,000 citizens deaths due to mishandling of COVID-19. 

(Timothy Snyder on electing Convicted Felon Donald Trump & on the "Strongman Fantasy": Quite a few [ignorant/foolish] Americans like the idea of strongman rule. And now we have a president... who vows to persecute the enemy within, and who has [nominated] a cabinet that seems designed to overturn a republic. What’s wrong with that, ask many? Why not a dictator who will get things done?)


And what about Elon Musk's Guru who said in 2014 that America needs to..."get over and get used to having a dictator"? Elon who is invasive into our government now, who was NOT elected to do most of what he's doing in his ridiculous DOGE Trump department? As Trump tries to dismantle the FBI and other departments.

There isn’t a single definitive "proof" of this claim, but several indicators suggest that Trump's potential presidency (CFPOTUS 47) could bring more embarrassment and humiliation than positive feelings, even among some conservatives. 

Here’s how one might assess it:

1. Election Performance & Popularity Metrics

  • 2020 Loss: Trump lost the popular vote in both 2016 and 2020. If there were overwhelming positive support, he wouldn’t have lost in a record turnout election.
  • 2024 Polling Struggles: While Trump leads in some swing state polls, he remains deeply unpopular nationwide. His net approval rating has consistently been negative since he left office.
  • Biden vs. Trump Favorability: Despite Biden’s weaknesses, national polls still show Trump is more disliked than liked by the general electorate.

2. Criminal Charges & Scandals

  • Trump is the first former U.S. president to be criminally indicted 91 times across four separate cases. No modern world leader has ever faced such legal trouble while running for office.
  • Court cases in New York, Georgia, Florida, and D.C. have led to humiliating revelations about his finances, hush money payments, election interference, and mishandling of classified documents.
  • Even Fox News and right-wing media have expressed concerns that these scandals make him unelectable.

3. GOP & Conservative Figures Distancing Themselves

  • Ron DeSantis, Nikki Haley, and Mike Pence—all former allies—have openly criticized Trump’s leadership, electability, and moral fitness for office.
  • The Heritage Foundation’s Project 2025 is preparing for a Trump-like presidency, but they don’t necessarily trust Trump himself. They want a more disciplined version of his policies.
  • Republican donors like the Koch network have tried to back alternative candidates, indicating hesitation about his return.

4. Public & Media Mockery

  • Saturday Night Live, late-night shows, and comedians consistently use Trump as a source of ridicule. His bizarre rants about whales, sharks, Hannibal Lecter, and batteries have fueled viral memes.
  • The phrase “Trump's Cognitive Decline” has been trending more frequently, even among conservatives, due to his increasing verbal mistakes and confusion in speeches.
  • His own MAGA supporters sometimes laugh at him. Example: At a rally, he confused Obama and Biden multiple times, causing chuckles even from the crowd.

5. MAGA Base Shrinking & Growing Fatigue

  • Trump rallies are not as packed as they used to be—a sign of dwindling enthusiasm.
  • "Trump Fatigue" is a real thing, even among some MAGA supporters who feel exhausted by the never-ending drama and legal issues.
  • Polling among independent voters shows a clear rejection of Trump, which is crucial for winning in 2024.

Conclusion

While hardcore MAGA supporters still adore Trump, the broader public—including independents and even some conservatives—views his return as chaotic, embarrassing, and legally fraught. The GOP itself is torn, with many preferring Trump’s policies but not his scandals. The weight of indictments, gaffes, and political baggage suggests that a second Trump term would bring more national and international humiliation than genuine triumph.

What about polls, concerns over Trump attacking Canada and Mexico, and others with threats of tariff wars?

Recent developments indicate significant concern over President Donald Trump's imposition of tariffs on Canada and Mexico, with public opinion reflecting apprehension about potential economic repercussions.

Public Opinion on Tariffs

A recent poll indicates that 51% of respondents oppose President Trump's tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China. This opposition underscores widespread unease about the potential economic impact of such trade policies.

Economic Concerns

The tariffs have sparked panic and anger in Canada and Mexico, with economists predicting disruptions in supply chains, inflation, and job losses in all three countries. There is a potential for Canada and Mexico to enter recessions due to these measures.

Market Reactions

Global stock markets have reacted negatively to the tariffs, with significant declines observed in the US, Europe, and Asia. Major indices such as Germany's DAX, France's CAC, and the UK's FTSE 100 experienced drops of over 1%. In the US, the Dow Jones, S&P 500, and Nasdaq futures indicated declines between 1% and 2%.

These developments highlight the contentious nature of the tariffs and the concerns they raise among the public and economic experts.


It sounds more like Trump is acting the bully to other countries, getting responses from Canada and Mexico for 1,000s of troops to the borders, and threatening Canada he wants them as our 51st state when we clearly have protectorates who are decades in line for statehood first. 

Trump ridiculous imperial expansionism is also denigrating America's reputation worldwide. It's bad enough simply having him as our chief representative around the world has humiliated US.

In an effort to address issues such as illegal immigration and drug trafficking, President Trump announced plans to impose a 25% tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico. In response, both countries have agreed to deploy 10,000 troops each to their respective U.S. borders to enhance security measures.

Annexation Remarks and Canadian Response

Further escalating tensions, President Trump suggested that Canada should become the 51st state of the United States. This proposal was met with strong opposition from Canadian officials and citizens. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau labeled the suggestion as a distraction from the tariff dispute, emphasizing Canada's sovereignty and rejecting the notion of annexation.

Public Sentiment in Canada

The combination of tariff threats and annexation remarks has led to a surge of anti-American sentiment in Canada. Many Canadians are boycotting American products, canceling trips to the U.S., and promoting local goods as acts of patriotism. Social media campaigns advocating for the boycott of U.S. products have gained momentum, reflecting the public's discontent with the current U.S. administration's policies.

Conclusion

CFPOTUS 47 Trump's recent actions and statements have strained relationships with Canada and Mexico, leading to significant diplomatic challenges and public backlash. The situation underscores the importance of careful diplomatic engagement with neighboring countries.

Trump is a bully, that's not up for dispute. 

Then there is his oligarch issue, one that AOC has said we are fully in the midst of, not the beginning of.

Her observation aligns with concerns expressed by various political figures and analysts regarding the concentration of wealth and power in the United States. Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) has been vocal about the nation's shift towards oligarchy. In a recent statement, she emphasized that the U.S. is not merely approaching oligarchy but is already experiencing it, highlighting the significant influence of billionaires on politics and policy.

This perspective is supported by studies indicating that economic elites and organized business interests have substantial impacts on U.S. government policy, often outweighing the preferences of average citizens. A notable 2014 study by political scientists Martin Gilens and Benjamin Page found that the U.S. political system favors the interests of the wealthy and powerful, leading to policy outcomes that do not necessarily reflect the desires of the broader population.

Former President Jimmy Carter also described the United States as an "oligarchy with unlimited political bribery," pointing to the pervasive influence of money in politics.

These assessments suggest that the U.S. has moved beyond the initial stages of oligarchy, with wealth and power increasingly concentrated among a small segment of the population, thereby diminishing the influence of the average citizen in political processes.

For a more in-depth perspective, this discussion may (or may not) be informative:

Let's not forget this, how CFPOTUS47 is dismantling our DOJ because they tried and mostly failed to hold him accountable for his Jan. 6 insurrection and so much more...

Recent actions by President Donald Trump have raised significant concerns about attempts to undermine the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The administration has initiated the dismissal of prosecutors involved in the January 6 investigations and is moving toward ousting FBI agents associated with these cases.

Our crippled Department of Justice (DOJ) has terminated several senior FBI officials and demanded a list of personnel involved in the January 6 Capitol attack investigation, indicating potential further dismissals. Experts describe these actions as unprecedented, noting that mass firings for participation in an investigation are unheard of. Such measures could compromise the FBI's effectiveness in critical areas like counterterrorism and threaten the agency's independence.

In response, the FBI Agents Association, representing over 14,000 current and former agents, has appealed to Congress to protect employees facing punishment or termination due to their involvement in the January 6 investigations. The association's letter to lawmakers expressed concerns that these actions might jeopardize agents' careers and disrupt essential Bureau operations.

Critics argue that these moves undermine the rule of law and resemble tactics seen in authoritarian regimes, where governmental agencies are purged of individuals deemed disloyal. This situation has sparked a broader debate about the future of democratic norms and the independence of federal institutions in the United States.

For a more in-depth analysis, you might find this discussion informative:


Best of luck to us all...


Compiled with aid of ChatGPT