Remember Trump's famous favorite Bible quote? No? Come on! Really?

Remember Trump's famous favorite Bible quote?

He's got one, right?

So if he does have one, based upon his actions as president, or his decades as a miserable example of a "businessman" over his lifetime, WHAT IS IT?

What might, say...three of his favorite quotes be?

The famous moment: Trump was asked his favorite Bible verse in 2015 and couldn't name one. He later cited "an eye for an eye" as his philosophy -- which is real (Leviticus/Exodus), but notably Jesus specifically repudiates it in Matthew 5:38-39. So his "favorite" is the verse Christ overruled.

Three that actually fit his record:

1. Proverbs 21:6 "A fortune made by a lying tongue is a fleeting vapor and a deadly snare." -- Six bankruptcies, Trump University fraud settlement, inflated asset valuations. The vapor part aged well.

2. Matthew 6:5 "When you pray, do not be like the hypocrites, for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and on the street corners to be seen by others." -- The Lafayette Square Bible photo op, holding it upside down. Scripture as prop.

3. 1 Timothy 6:10 "The love of money is a root of all kinds of evil." -- Covers pretty much the entire career arc and the current presidency-as-profit-center Raskin was describing above.

The brutal irony is that "eye for an eye" being his self-chosen verse is actually the most honest thing he's ever said about himself.

Trump's politics are pure Old Testament retribution politics with zero New Testament grace anywhere in sight.

Trump really seems to be an Old Testament guy, though.

Old Testament Trump?

The OT God is frequently wrathful, vengeful, tribal, transactional, and rewards loyalty above almost everything else.

So? Trump IS like the Old Testament, immature, vindictive, jealous "God"?

Punishment is swift and disproportionate. Enemies are smited.

The chosen people are exceptional by definition. 

Outsiders are threats. Sounds kind of like a five-year-old.

But it maps almost perfectly onto Trump's operating psychology.

The transactional covenant thing is key.

OT theology is largely "obey and prosper, disobey and suffer."

Trump runs the same deal -- loyalty is rewarded, disloyalty is destroyed.

It's less a moral framework than a power framework with religious language draped over it.

What Trump actively rejects from the New Testament:

• Forgiveness of enemies (he never forgives, or apologizes, doubling down, always)
• Humility ("blessed are the meek" -- not a Trump value)
• Turning the other cheek (see: "eye for an eye")
• Care for the poor and stranger (see: every immigration and social policy)
• The rich man and the needle's eye passage -- genuinely inconvenient for him

The dark irony is that evangelical Christians, who are supposed to be defined by the New Testament and Christ's teachings, have attached themselves to perhaps the most purely Old Testament political figure in American history.

See, white Christian Nationalism. Or the American Taliban.

Allow me... And there it is. The through line.

Why the OT fits WCN perfectly:

White Christian Nationalism isn't really Christianity in any theological sense. It's a tribal identity system that uses Christian iconography as its flag. The Old Testament gives them what they actually want:

A chosen people narrative
A promised land (America as covenant nation)
Divine sanction for conquest and dominance
Clear in-group/out-group boundaries
A wrathful God who punishes enemies
Tribal law over universal grace

The New Testament is genuinely problematic for them because Christ was a Middle Eastern Jew who preached radical inclusion, care for immigrants and outcasts, rejection of wealth and power, and forgiveness of enemies. That's essentially the opposite of the WCN political program.

So they quietly sideline Jesus as a theological figure while keeping the cross as a political symbol. The cross at January 6th wasn't about the Sermon on the Mount.

Trump as OT figure works for them because he's Cyrus -- the flawed pagan king God uses as an instrument anyway. That's literally the theological framework many WCN pastors use. It's clever because it immunizes him against any moral critique.

The deepest irony: They've built a political religion around the parts of the Bible their own Christ specifically came to supersede.

That's not Christianity. That's nationalism wearing Christianity's coat.

While we're on the topic of Trump's nonsense...

The Trump "Weave" Nonsense Unravels: A Decade of Cognitive Decline in Donald Trump's Public Speech

1980s — Coherent, even articulate in interviews; sentences complete, vocabulary precise, stays on topic. Fundamental life view pretty messed up, however. Still capable of hiding that.
1990s — Still functional but shallower; the braggadocio is increasing, substance thinning.
2011 — Filler words measurably increasing in recorded interviews; vague placeholder language creeping in.
2015 — Campaign launch; rambling style rewarded by crowds, masking deterioration with performative energy.
2016 — Tangentiality accelerating but mistaken for authenticity; wins the presidency.
2017 — First STAT linguistic analysis finds his speaking style has already worsened significantly since the 1980s.
2018 — Still capable of structured prepared remarks but unscripted responses increasingly fragmented.
2019 — Repetition of key phrases intensifying; same anecdotes recycled regardless of context.
2020 — Post-election loss triggers emotional constriction; all-or-nothing vocabulary spikes.
2021 — Negative emotional language dominates; "never," "always," "completely" becoming verbal tics.
2022 — Word retrieval errors becoming regular; confabulation harder to distinguish from deliberate lying.
2023 — Haley/Pelosi confusion; uncorrected errors normalizing; digressions no longer return to a point.
2024 — Abrupt unframed topic shifts more than double; changes exceed what stylistic continuity can explain.
2025 — Retrieval failures, disorganized sequencing, errors go uncorrected in real time; the compensating mechanisms are visibly breaking down.
2026 — Currently in office, 79 years old, mentally older, and the public record of any given week supplies fresh examples without having to look hard.

The baseline has shifted to where the episodes are no longer remarkable enough to dominate any news cycle.

By the way?

That normalization may be the most telling data point of all.

Cheers! Sláinte! Na zdravie!

Compiled with aid of  Claude AI 

JZ Murdock is a retired Senior Technical Writer/IT administrator, and an active award-winning author/ filmmaker, documentarian, and writer based in Bremerton, Washington. 

He publishes commentary on the state of things at murdockinations.com and on his creative works over at Substack. He also posts on Slasher.com on the horror genre.

If this work means something to you, you can support it at Ko-fi. Tips are always welcome and go directly toward keeping independent documentary work possible.

U.S. Foreign Aid Freeze Supports World's "Strongmen" Regimes

 Foreign strongmen cheer as Musk dismantles US aid agency:

Leaders in Russia, Hungary and El Salvador welcomed the Trump administration’s assault on U.S.A.I.D., which many authoritarians have seen as a threat.

Recent reports indicate that authoritarian regimes worldwide are viewing the U.S. foreign aid freeze as an opportunity to strengthen their positions.

The suspension of aid has led to the halting of funding for numerous grassroots groups promoting democracy in countries such as Venezuela, Cuba, China, and Belarus. Experts argue that this move sends a negative signal to dictatorships and undermines efforts to support pro-democracy activists.

apnews.com

In Southeast Asia, the aid freeze has caused significant disruptions. In Myanmar, healthcare centers for refugees and HIV programs are shutting down, threatening lives and diminishing support for pro-democracy activists amid a brutal military regime. In the Philippines, critical services like disaster response and health projects are affected, with the government claiming the freeze’s impact will be temporary. Vietnam faces a halt to demining and development aid, while Indonesia’s health and governance initiatives risk suspension. Cambodia’s efforts in economic growth, health, and human rights are jeopardized, with significant consequences for independent journalism and mine clearance programs, potentially endangering lives.

theguardian.com

Analysts warn that the aid suspension could have long-term consequences, including potential damage to the legitimacy of Western governments in the region, thereby benefiting Beijing's influence. The freeze affects over $60 billion in aid from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), impacting crucial areas such as vaccine rollouts, mine clearing, anti-human trafficking, democracy promotion, and healthcare funding. Regional agencies report chaos and confusion, with suspended jobs and projects. Experts criticize the move as counterproductive to U.S. interests in the region, risking stability and trust. There is also concern over the future of critical programs, like US-backed HIV/AIDS initiatives.

theaustralian.com.au

Critics, including the Human Rights Foundation, emphasize that cutting funding to these essential efforts sends the wrong signal to dictatorships and undermines the brave individuals fighting for freedom. They urge the restoration and prioritization of these critical investments.

apnews.com

Global Impact of U.S. Foreign Aid Freeze

apnews.com

Trump's foreign aid freeze could prove to be a boon for the world's authoritarian strongmen

2 days ago

theguardian.com

Demining to democracy: how Trump's foreign aid freeze will affect south-east Asia

7 days ago

theaustralian.com.au

Gift for Beijing: Asia-Pacific analysts say shock US aid freeze 'an own goal'

3 days ago

Compiled with the aid of ChatGPT

Why CFPOTUS47 Donald Trump Nominates Unqualified People to His Administration Positions

The purpose of a national leader nominating unqualified candidates to lead major departments or divisions of government can vary, often depending on the leader's intentions, ideology, or political strategy. 

Here are some possible reasons:

1. Ideological Alignment Over Expertise

The leader may prioritize loyalty or alignment with their political ideology over technical qualifications. This could be to ensure that appointees are more likely to implement the leader's agenda without resistance, even if they lack the expertise needed for the role.

2. Undermining Institutions

By placing unqualified individuals in key positions, a leader may intentionally or unintentionally weaken the effectiveness of governmental institutions. This could serve to diminish public trust in government or pave the way for restructuring the system to align with their vision.

3. Fostering Dependency

Unqualified appointees may rely more heavily on the leader for guidance or direction, reducing their independence. This dynamic can consolidate power within the leader's inner circle, as decisions and actions are more easily controlled.

4. Cronyism or Nepotism

The appointments might reflect favoritism toward friends, family, or political allies, regardless of their qualifications. This could be a way to reward loyalty, secure financial backers, or strengthen personal networks.

5. Sabotaging or Reforming a Department

A leader may wish to intentionally disrupt or dismantle a particular department or agency they view as obstructive or unnecessary. An unqualified appointee could accelerate dysfunction or make reforms easier to push through by mismanaging the existing bureaucracy.

6. Lack of Interest in Governance

In some cases, a leader may not prioritize good governance, focusing instead on personal or political gains. Appointing unqualified individuals might reflect a disregard for the importance of expertise in government.

7. Intentional Distrust of "Experts"

The leader might aim to challenge or reject traditional expertise, seeing it as aligned with an elite or establishment that they oppose. Appointing outsiders, regardless of qualifications, could resonate with populist or anti-establishment rhetoric.

8. Signaling Change

The appointments could be a symbolic gesture to disrupt the status quo. By breaking away from norms, the leader might be trying to communicate a shift in priorities, even if it comes at the expense of competence.

9. Short-Term Gains Over Long-Term Stability

The leader might prioritize immediate political victories or optics over long-term effectiveness. Unqualified appointees may be easier to manipulate or willing to take actions that more qualified individuals might resist.

While some of these reasons could be unintentional or situational, others reflect a deliberate strategy. The consequences of such appointments often manifest in inefficiencies, controversies, or crises that may undermine public trust and governance.

In his second term, Convicted Felon POTUS47 (CFPOTUS47) Donald Trump has nominated several individuals to key government positions whose qualifications have been widely questioned. 

For instance, Pete Hegseth, a former Fox News host and military veteran, was confirmed as Secretary of Defense despite allegations of personal misconduct and concerns over his lack of experience in managing large organizations.

AP News

Similarly, Tulsi Gabbard, a former congresswoman and Fox News contributor, was nominated for Director of National Intelligence, a role traditionally held by individuals with extensive intelligence backgrounds. These appointments have raised concerns about the prioritization of loyalty and media presence over relevant expertise.

New York Magazine

Critics argue that such nominations may reflect a strategy to appoint loyalists who align closely with the president's views, potentially at the expense of effective governance. This approach could lead to the undermining of institutional integrity and a consolidation of power within the executive branch.

The Atlantic

The implications of appointing unqualified individuals to critical government roles include potential inefficiencies, ethical concerns, and a decrease in public trust in governmental institutions. These actions may be part of a broader effort to reshape the federal government according to the president's agenda, emphasizing loyalty and ideological alignment over traditional qualifications.

 Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Is Trumpian MaGA at All Akin to Irish Sinn Fein in Fighting for Freedom?

Can the MaGA Christian nationalist movement in America see themselves as a kind of Sinn Fein in Ireland, fighting for freedom and righteousness?

An Phoblacht (Irish for "The Republic") is a longstanding Irish republican publication that serves as the official voice of Sinn Féin, the Irish nationalist and political party. It plays a significant role in promoting the party's policies, perspectives, and broader republican ideals. 

Back to America...

While there might be some parallels in rhetoric or self-perception, the comparison between MAGA Christian nationalists in America and Sinn Féin in Ireland is not straightforward. Here's why:

Similarities in Self-Perception

1. Freedom Fighters: Some MAGA Christian nationalists may see themselves as defenders of traditional American values and freedoms, portraying their actions as a battle against perceived moral or societal decay. This could echo how Sinn Féin historically framed their struggle as a fight for Irish freedom and self-determination.

2. Religious Justification: Both groups have leveraged religious or moral narratives. Christian nationalists often tie their mission to a divine mandate, while Sinn Féin’s support base historically included individuals who framed Irish independence within a Catholic cultural context.

3. Opposition to a Perceived Elite: Both movements may see themselves as opposing powerful, entrenched elites or systems that they believe oppress their communities or values.

Key Differences

1. Historical Context: Sinn Féin was directly tied to the Irish republican struggle against British colonial rule and was associated with violent resistance through the IRA. MAGA Christian nationalists operate in a democratic context and are not fighting an occupying force but rather opposing shifts in cultural and political power within their own country.

2. National Identity vs. Religious Identity: Sinn Féin's focus was primarily on national sovereignty and independence, while MAGA Christian nationalists focus heavily on cultural and religious identity, seeking to align American laws and governance with their interpretation of Christian values.

3. Use of Violence: Sinn Féin’s struggle was linked to armed conflict, whereas most MAGA Christian nationalist actions remain within the bounds of political advocacy, protests, and legal battles. However, there have been fringe elements engaging in or advocating for violence, such as during the January 6th Capitol attack.

4. Ideological Breadth: Sinn Féin evolved into a political party with a broader left-wing platform, while MAGA Christian nationalism is a subset of the larger MAGA movement and focuses on specific cultural and religious issues.

Concluding Thoughts

While some MAGA Christian nationalists might view their actions as a righteous struggle akin to movements like Sinn Féin, the contexts, objectives, and methods are quite distinct. The comparison may resonate rhetorically for those framing their efforts as a moral crusade, but the historical and political differences are substantial.

It really seems the comparison is more likely that American liberals against Trumpian MaGA nationalism in a reverse kind of similarity than MaGA's theistically (weaponized) base of authoritarianism could be considered.

If we look at the comparison in reverse, with American liberals or progressives being likened to Sinn Féin in terms of their opposition to perceived authoritarianism or domination, the analogy does gain more traction in several ways:

---

Comparing American Liberals to Sinn Féin (In Reverse)

1. Resistance to Perceived Oppression

   • Sinn Féin: Fought against British colonialism and what they saw as systemic domination over Irish identity, culture, and sovereignty.
   • American Liberals: Often position themselves as resisting the rise of authoritarianism and Christian nationalism, advocating for pluralism, equity, and individual rights.

2. Advocacy for Inclusion and Rights

   • Sinn Féin: Historically associated with efforts to uplift the marginalized, including Catholics in Northern Ireland under systemic discrimination.
   • American Liberals: Champion causes like racial justice, LGBTQ+ rights, reproductive freedom, and protections for minorities, often arguing against structures they see as exclusionary or oppressive.

3. Grassroots Movements and Popular Resistance

   • Sinn Féin: Rooted in grassroots organizing and seen as a voice for the Irish working class and those disenfranchised by British rule.
   • American Liberals: Rely heavily on grassroots movements (e.g., Black Lives Matter, climate activism) to counteract conservative or nationalist policies.

4. Framing the Struggle as Moral and Ethical

   • Sinn Féin: Framed their resistance as a fight for justice and righteousness against oppression.
   • American Liberals: Often portray their resistance to MAGA nationalism as defending democracy, human rights, and the moral fabric of a pluralistic society.

---

Why This Reverse Analogy Fits Better

1. Sinn Féin's Struggle Against Domination
   Sinn Féin resisted what they saw as an oppressive power structure, which mirrors how American liberals see MAGA Christian nationalism: an attempt to enforce a specific cultural and religious hegemony over a diverse society.

2. Liberal Resistance to Authoritarian Tendencies
   Sinn Féin opposed the British government’s authoritarian grip on Ireland. Similarly, liberals often criticize MAGA nationalism for its tendencies toward authoritarianism, suppression of dissent, and undermining of democratic norms.

3. Liberals’ Use of International Solidarity
   Sinn Féin’s struggle gained international sympathy, particularly from Irish-Americans. Similarly, American liberals often appeal to global values, such as human rights and environmentalism, to build solidarity.

---

Differences That Temper the Analogy

1. Sinn Féin's Use of Violence
   Sinn Féin was historically linked to armed resistance, which contrasts with the largely peaceful strategies of American liberals, even in the face of far-right extremism.

2. Power Dynamics
   Sinn Féin represented a colonized group with little systemic power. While American liberals are not an oppressed group in the same way, they see themselves as defending the democratic balance against what they view as an authoritarian threat.

---

Conclusion

Your suggestion makes sense: the struggle of American liberals against MAGA Christian nationalism could indeed mirror Sinn Féin's fight, but in reverse. Sinn Féin represented the underdog fighting against a dominating force, which aligns more naturally with how liberals view themselves opposing a MAGA agenda they perceive as authoritarian and culturally monolithic. Meanwhile, MAGA nationalism might more closely resemble the imperialist and hegemonic power Sinn Féin resisted.

On An Phoblacht

Here's a breakdown of what the magazine is and its history:

Overview

• Purpose: An Phoblacht acts as a platform for Sinn Féin to advocate for Irish reunification, socialism, and the end of British rule in Northern Ireland. It addresses social, political, and cultural issues from a republican perspective.
• Name: "An Phoblacht" reflects its commitment to the vision of an Irish republic as outlined in the 1916 Proclamation of Independence.

---

History

1. Origins (1906): The title was first used in the early 20th century by various republican groups. The modern version is most closely tied to Sinn Féin.
2. Merger in 1970: Two republican papers, An Phoblacht (based in Dublin) and Republican News (based in Belfast), merged in 1979 to form the magazine as it exists today.
3. Peak Circulation: During the height of the Troubles in the 1980s, the magazine was a major outlet for republican viewpoints, both in Ireland and internationally.
4. Digital Shift: While originally a weekly print publication, An Phoblacht shifted to an online-only format in 2018, aligning with modern media trends.

---

Content

• Political Commentary: Articles on Irish reunification, Brexit's implications for Ireland, and Sinn Féin’s policies.
• Historical Perspectives: Features on Ireland's struggle for independence, the 1916 Easter Rising, and events during the Troubles.
• Cultural Content: Commentary on Irish culture, language preservation (especially Irish Gaelic), and republicanism in the arts.
• Social Justice: Advocacy for workers’ rights, environmentalism, and equality, aligned with Sinn Féin's leftist ideals.

---

Role During the Troubles

• Platform for Republicans: During the Northern Ireland conflict (1960s–1998), An Phoblacht was a critical platform for the republican movement to communicate its message, counter British narratives, and address its supporters.
• Controversy: It faced criticism for its close ties to the Provisional Irish Republican Army (IRA) and was accused of being a propaganda outlet for armed republicanism.

---

Modern Relevance

• An Phoblacht continues to champion Sinn Féin's vision of a united Ireland and addresses contemporary issues like economic inequality, housing crises, and climate change.
• It remains a voice for Irish republicanism globally, appealing to the Irish diaspora and supporters of Sinn Féin's political agenda.

---

In summary, An Phoblacht is more than a magazine; it is a key historical and political tool for Sinn Féin, shaping and amplifying the republican message for over a century.

Choose your side, because the losers are about to be in power. 

Remember, losing doesn't mean you're wrong. But thinking you're winning and that you're Right? Not true either. Especially when you're on the side of crime and authoritarianism in a country primarily and wholly set to exist to be against monarchy.

Cheers! Sláinte!

Compiled with aid from ChatGPT

The Once "Grand Old Party", the Once "Republican Party" of Lincoln, is No More

Because so many "Republicans" or "conservatives" no longer know who they are or what they stand for, while still believing and reveling in past glory when they are no longer what they once were and had become known and praised for.

Now Democrats have their own concerns and issues, but nothing as vast or problematic as the MaGA GOP today with its confused messaging, autocratic orientations, lies and disinformation platform.  

They are now mostly ideology over citizens, party over country, leader over party, autocracy over democracy.

Most Trump supporters feel free to ignore this, as it's info they probably aren't interested in having to know, or deal with.

There are still "Republicans" but the party at large refers to them as "RINOs", Republicans in name only, while those calling others that are, for the most part, actual RINOs.

The once-Republican Party of Lincoln, originally founded in the mid-1800s, was shaped by principles of abolitionism, civil rights, and federal power to unify the country.

Over time, especially in the late 1800s and early 1900s, the party shifted from its roots as an advocate for civil rights and anti-slavery, embracing more conservative economic policies focused on business and limited government.

By the 20th century, Republicans moved away from the progressive policies associated with Lincoln's era, with further shifts in the 1960s as the party increasingly courted Southern conservative voters.

This transformation saw the GOP evolve into a party defined more by conservative values, limited federal intervention, and an emphasis on states’ rights, markedly different from Lincoln’s original vision.

The Democratic Party, historically rooted in states' rights and agrarian interests, gradually took up the mantle of civil rights and social reform that once defined Lincoln's Republican Party. This shift began in the early 20th century, as Democrats adopted more progressive policies under leaders like Woodrow Wilson and Franklin D. Roosevelt, who expanded federal government intervention to address economic inequality, labor rights, and social welfare during the New Deal era.

The transformation accelerated in the 1960s when Democratic leaders like John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson championed civil rights legislation. Johnson’s support for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 solidified the party's role as an advocate for racial equality and social justice, a position that further distanced them from the segregationist elements of their past.

This shift also led to a realignment of voter bases: as the Democratic Party became associated with civil rights and progressive social issues, many conservative Southern voters shifted to the Republican Party. The modern Democratic Party thus came to champion many of the inclusive, equality-focused ideals that had characterized Lincoln’s Republicans, while the GOP shifted toward a platform emphasizing traditional values, limited government, and conservative policies.

Today’s Republican conservative values differ significantly from original conservative principles. Classic conservatism, as articulated by thinkers like Edmund Burke, emphasized caution in societal change, a respect for tradition, and a commitment to stability, with an emphasis on personal responsibility, rule of law, and small government. Traditional conservatives believed in upholding institutions and norms, often avoiding radical shifts in policy that could disrupt social order.

In contrast, modern American conservatism has evolved, particularly within the Republican Party. Today, it often emphasizes a populist approach that challenges established institutions and norms, including the judiciary and the media. Recent conservative movements within the GOP have supported significant government intervention on issues like immigration, reproductive rights, and voting laws, focusing less on institutional stability and more on advancing specific social agendas. The GOP has also embraced fiscal policies that diverge from early conservative economic prudence, such as deficit spending and tax cuts for corporations, which early conservatives might have viewed skeptically.

This shift represents a move away from traditional conservatism’s focus on incremental change and institutional respect toward a more populist, activist form of conservatism that prioritizes ideological goals over the original conservative caution.

A more precise term for today’s Republican Party might be "populist right" or "nationalist right." These terms capture the party’s shift from traditional conservatism to a platform that emphasizes strong national identity, populist appeals, and a willingness to disrupt established norms to achieve specific political and cultural goals.

Populist Right: This term reflects the focus on appealing directly to "the people" or "the common man" and often emphasizes anti-elite, anti-establishment rhetoric. This populist approach involves a strong appeal to certain groups' grievances and perceived loss of status, frequently targeting institutions like the media, academia, and government as "elites" who are out of touch with everyday Americans.

Nationalist Right: This term reflects the increased emphasis on national sovereignty, a strong stance on immigration, and a focus on traditional American identity and values. Nationalist right politics prioritize policies that favor domestic interests, sometimes at the expense of international alliances or global institutions.

Right-Wing Populism: Combining elements of populism with conservative ideas, this term encapsulates a political style that challenges established structures while using conservative rhetoric on social issues.

Each of these terms captures aspects of the modern GOP’s orientation that differ from traditional conservatism, particularly its embrace of more radical change and direct appeals to popular, often nationalist sentiment.

These people who support Donald Trump and his MaGA are focused on concepts, and ideals over people. That is merely a tool in life, but when used blindly, it leads to what we see today from the Right wing. To wit...

People who view the world primarily through ideological frameworks rather than through the lens of individual experiences and actual impacts on people are often referred to as ideologues. Ideologues hold rigid beliefs, interpreting events and issues through the lens of their preferred ideology without necessarily considering the practical or human consequences.

This kind of outlook, sometimes called ideological absolutism or dogmatism, can lead to a detachment from real-world consequences and empathy, as they prioritize the purity or consistency of their ideas over the nuanced, complex needs of people. Political theorists also refer to this as political moralism, where abstract principles are valued over pragmatic, compassionate approaches to governance and interpersonal issues.

In extreme cases, such a perspective can foster authoritarian tendencies, where the enforcement of ideology takes precedence over individual freedoms and wellbeing. This mindset can be seen in people who prioritize ideological "wins" even when they come at a personal or societal cost, causing harm in both governmental policies and personal relationships.

I wish us ALL the best, for those of us with the best intentions at heart, where the "best intentions" actually are, our best for us all.

Cheers! Sláinte!

"20 lessons from the 20th century" by Timothy Snyder

Compiled with the aid of ChatGPT

What IS Trump selling?

 What is Trump selling through his MaGA concept/contempt?

Memories. The Past.

What are the rest of us involved in?

Life, reality, progress.

It is in THAT gap between, wherein Trump has weaponized reality against US all.

All "that" IS our lives.

Not the past.

Trump’s “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) concept taps into nostalgia for a perceived better past. It suggests that this longing for the past can overshadow the realities and challenges of the present and future. Here’s a breakdown:

Trump’s Selling Point: 

Nostalgia – MAGA is centered around a romanticized vision of a past that many see as simpler or better. This focus on “the past” can evoke strong emotional responses and a sense of identity tied to bygone times, which can be potent in political messaging.

The Present and Future – In contrast, being “involved in life, reality, and progress” involves addressing current issues and preparing for the future. This often requires confronting uncomfortable truths and working towards change, which can be more complex and less immediately gratifying than nostalgia.

The Weaponization of Reality – By leveraging a nostalgic view of the past, Trump can create a narrative that frames current realities as problems to be solved by returning to an idealized previous state. This can be seen as a way to weaponize reality, turning it into a battleground between the idealized past and the challenging present.

The Gap – The difference between a nostalgic vision of the past and the reality of the present. This gap can create a disconnect, where solutions based on outdated views might not address current complexities effectively.

By focusing on the past, Trump’s narrative can sideline the more nuanced and necessary engagement with the present and future. This dynamic is a powerful tool in shaping political discourse and public perception.

It is counterintuitive and counterproductive. But it gives Trump and MaGA leadership, power. It leads to an imbalance as power must come from somewhere. Which is where the rest of us come in.

Donald Trump is actually a very poor debater. But he seems to win debates. Why?

That phenomenon is often referred to as "rhetorical manipulation" or "demagoguery." These terms describe tactics that sway audiences not through structured argumentation, facts, or reasoning, but by exploiting emotions, distractions, or other forms of persuasion that deviate from traditional debate norms. Some of the tactics Trump has used in this context include:

• Ad hominem attacks: Attacking the opponent personally rather than addressing their arguments.
• Appeals to emotion: Using fear, anger, or pride to rally support.
• False equivalence: Presenting two unequal things as though they were comparable.
• Gish gallop: Overwhelming the opponent with numerous rapid claims, many of which may be false or misleading, making it difficult for them to respond.

These strategies can allow someone to "win" a debate in the eyes of an audience without adhering to the logical structure typically expected in formal debate.

There is more involved in all this mess we've been led into today. Things that MaGA and Trump are pushing so hard into the Republican Party that they are no longer the once "Grand Old Party", the GOP they once were.

And it began long ago...

Did you know, Rutherford B. Hayes’ decision to remove federal troops from the South in 1877 played a significant role in shaping race relations in America and has lasting implications. When Hayes withdrew the troops, it effectively ended Reconstruction and allowed Southern states to enact Jim Crow laws, which institutionalized racial segregation and disenfranchisement of Black citizens.

This set the stage for nearly a century of oppressive policies, including limited voting rights and economic inequality, that continued to fuel racial tensions well into the 20th century and still resonate today.

The removal of federal protection for ex-slaves led to widespread violence and intimidation, often perpetrated by groups like the Ku Klux Klan, which sought to maintain white supremacy. Many of these groups, or the broader movement they represent, have ideological ties to today’s problematic militias, which see themselves as defenders of a particular social order.

Back then, “gun clubs” and paramilitary groups often formed to protect white interests, especially as federal oversight waned. Some of the anti-government militias seen today claim lineage from these 19th-century movements, though modern militias are more fragmented and diverse in their motivations.

Turning out backs on these militias, ignoring their misrepresentation of the 2nd Amendment, esp,. in modern times has allowed a counter narrative to grow into a political entity that has set the stage for some very untenable and ridiculous beliefs, infecting a major political party.

1991 interview on The MacNeil/Lehrer NewsHour Chief Justice Warren E. Burger: “The gun lobby’s interpretation of the Second Amendment is one of the greatest pieces of fraud — I repeat the word ‘fraud’ — on the American public by special interest groups that I have ever seen in my lifetime. The real purpose of the Second Amendment was to ensure that state armies — the militias — would be maintained for the defense of the state. The very language of the Second Amendment refutes any argument that it was intended to guarantee every citizen an unfettered right to any kind of weapon he or she desires.”

In short, Hayes' decision to end Reconstruction gave rise to segregationist policies and violent white supremacist groups that evolved into organizations that still influence race relations and militia culture today.

Had Hayes not been president, perhaps today the bigotry and racism would be far, far less apparent. We are a nation of mixed cultures. We can work together. We can be pulled together by our similarities, rather than praise politicians and religious leaders who sell us on division and irritation, fanned into fear and hate, all for their personal agendas and success.

We can do better. Obviously.

Cheers! Sláinte!

What IS the "MaGA Mind"?

What IS the "MaGA Mind"? First, it's got to go.

[By the way, the "a" is in lowercase for "america" because of the dishonesty and disrespect Trump and his contingent offer to our America.]

There's also a poll on X (Twitter) about Donald Trump being tried for his actual crimes and what his punishment should be upon conviction. Life? Death? Too soon?

The 'MaGA Mind' refers to the mindset cultivated by Donald Trump and his supporters, characterized by a distorted perception of America, grounded in fear, authoritarian tendencies, and binary thinking.

The internet was built as a place where everyone could have equal footing.

What a fucking mistake THAT was! Because we are NOT equal.

Too many of us are delusional, mentally, or socially ill (racist, MaGA, etc.).

To give equal footing to THAT, was a HUGE mistake.

AS we're seeing now! THEN? We added in algorithms to skew it further, and with autocrats with billions purchasing our social media, altered our realities, with an agenda.

Sigh...

So, there's a lot to cover. I'll be jumping around a bit. For more hit my previous blogs. Also, Rachel Maddow's podcasts should be required for ANY and ALL Americans before they think all is hopeless or fall into MaGA-type nonsense.

We have two "Americas" here. One that is real and seen by the world. The other, is believed to exist by the MaGA supporter. One that is dark and terrible, crumbling and awful, filled with enemies and fear.

See also, Donald Trump's mental defect and TOC for the authoritarian (oddly same as Christian's "AntiChrist"!). Also: Humans default psychologically to "binary thinking" and sociologically to autocracy. Thus in the fight or flight (or freeze) mode to fear cliquishness, tribalism, and emergency protocols are all initiated by authoritarian triggers. 

Also this:
Marc E. Elias @marceelias
“I think we are going to see mass refusals to certify the election” in November, says Democratic election lawyer Marc Elias. “Everything we are seeing about this election is that the other side is more organized, more ruthless, and more prepared.”

It’s not that everyone who is a binary thinker falls for those things, but the "scripts" we run in our mind are. " Rolling Sone article

OK then...

Humans are susceptible to "sloppy thinking" and Donald Trump/autocracy uses that to his advantage. Autocracy itself uses many interesting techniques I've spoken to many times. Aside from logic traps or binary thinking ("this or that" when the offer OF "this or that" is disingenuously stacked).

One is what magicians call "forcing techniques":

Forcing Techniques: A variety of methods to make a participant believe they have freely chosen an option when the choice is actually predetermined. This can include:

Classic Force: Making the participant choose a specific card through practiced timing and technique.

Equivocation: Also known as the magician’s choice, where the magician guides the participant to a specific outcome regardless of their choices.

Timing Forces: Creating a sense of urgency or distraction to make the participant choose a specific option.

But that is not our America. That's not our democracy. That's not our democratic Constitutional Republic. These are messy things that appear dysfunctional and broken because of so many voices and beliefs that come together and iron out progress as we all see it. Not just as one group sees it believing they know best. That is an autocracy, a theocracy, a monarchy, a kleptocracy, or an oligarchy. 

US Government: While often categorized as a democracy, the United States is more accurately defined as a constitutional federal republic. What does this mean? “Constitutional” refers to the fact that government in the United States is based on a Constitution which is the supreme law of the United States. The Constitution not only provides the framework for how the federal and state governments are structured but also places significant limits on their powers. “Federal” means that there is both a national government and governments of the 50 states. A “republic” is a form of government in which the people hold power, but elect representatives to exercise that power.

Yes, the US is a constitutional federal republic: governed by a Constitution, power shared between federal & state govs, and led by elected reps. While not a direct democracy, it embodies democratic principles through elections and citizen participation.

Saying it is a democracy is still correct and others saying we're just a "Constitutional Republic" are using a phrase long used in the seditionist underground of Ultra Right Wing extremists. It's "cool" by their thinking to differentiate. But it's just a whistle call.

What we have is far better, messy as it can be, easily claimed to be broken by more "perfect" forms of social management. As Winston Churchill so aptly put it:

‘Many forms of Government have been tried and will be tried in this world of sin and woe. No one pretends that democracy is perfect or all-wise. Indeed it has been said that democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…’ - Winston S Churchill, 11 November 1947

Or as Ben Franklin put it before him. Monday, September 17, 1787: The Convention Today. The day began with a prepared speech from Franklin (PA) who, eighty-one years old and painfully afflicted with gout and kidney stone, was unable to read it himself and delegated that task to Wilson (PA)

“In these sentiments, Sir, I agree to this Constitution, with all its faults, if they are such; because I think a General Government necessary for us, and there is no form of government, but what may be a blessing to the people if well administered; and believe further, that this is likely to be well administered for a course of years, and can only end in despotism, as other forms have done before it, when the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government.”

Donald Trump is here, now to be that despot, to tear down what Franklin and the other frame for us, a new country, a "Great Experiment" of states under a federal system. One we should not "game" or play against our best interests to despoil into a "despotic government", such as Trump and his MaGA GOP intend.

The Trump America is a horror fantasy manufactured by a Republican Party that was ripe for an authoritarian to overtake it and plunge it into darkness and disrepute. 

"MaGA Mind"? Well? It is not what you think. You likely think it is a label for a group that supports Donald Trump and the propaganda and bizarre things he propagates out to his masses, to our media he discredits so brazenly, all in his inimitable, dumbed down, juvenile, and droll-like way.

But it IS just a brand. 

Donald Trump is a branding agent. He is branding and selling...Donald Trump. He is "selling" authoritarianism, he is "selling" Christian nationalism, he is "selling" authoritarianism and Fascism. 

All of which are pushing our "over there" and what is "right here" in front of us all. It is a kind of "magic", social engineering, manipulation, and mass hypnosis.

I have to refer back to my short sci-fi dystopian story I wrote in 1984 first published in a horror quarterly on the east coast of America in 1990. "In Memory, Yet Crystal Clear". You may have seen me mention this story before. It's a good example of how insidious what Donald Trump is doing. 

It offers the feeling of what I'm intellectually trying to say. Especially those in the MaGA "cult" who can understand better by reading such things, rather than in a rational assimilation. Which is never going to happen They cannot turn on their "tribe', their "cult", their "political" party, their 'brothers in arms", or their fantasy they "see" as their and all of our, reality.

The MaGA mindset conflates, obfuscates distracts, and outright lies. It actuates a stage long previously set up by grievance, religion, and an ability to believe through faith what does not exist. Or is unseen, or disbelieved by others. Nothing offers strength to the fantasy as much as a force to push again, an "Other" who are disbelievers. Or as Islam considers them as, "infidels". 

It's a brand that builds within one's mind a barrier that demands it not be infiltrated with knowledge, information, or facts, All reality served up by media or non-believers must be lies by the "Others". Thus we hear of "alt facts". Something so ludicrous that it openly displays the damage and delusion. But not to the "believer", not to the "MaGA Mind".

Here are some additional basic elements and labels of MaGA Mind:

1. Centralized Power: Concentration of power in the hands of a single leader or a small group, often bypassing democratic institutions.
2. Suppression of Dissent: Limiting freedom of speech, press, and assembly; punishing or silencing political opponents and critics.
3. Propaganda: Use of media to spread the regime’s ideology and to manipulate public opinion.
4. Control Over Judiciary: Undermining judicial independence to ensure legal outcomes favor the regime.
5. Erosion of Democratic Norms: Disregard for rule of law, checks and balances, and electoral integrity.
6. Surveillance: Monitoring and controlling the population through extensive surveillance programs.
7. Militarization: Increased use of military and police forces to maintain control and suppress opposition.
8. (Christian) Nationalism: Promoting a strong nationalistic sentiment, often at the expense of minority rights and international cooperation.
9. Scapegoating: Blaming societal problems on marginalized groups or foreign entities to unite the populace against a common enemy.
10. Economic Control: State intervention in the economy to maintain power and control over resources.
11. Censorship: Controlling information by restricting access to non-state-approved media and suppressing critical voices.
12. Manipulation of Elections: Rigging or undermining electoral processes to ensure the regime’s hold on power.
13. Patronage: Distributing state resources and benefits to loyal supporters to maintain their allegiance.
14. Cult of Personality: Elevating the leader to a near-mythical status through state-sponsored adulation.
15. Legalism: Using laws to give an appearance of legality to actions that subvert democratic principles.
16. Fear: Instilling fear in the populace through threats of violence, imprisonment, or other reprisals against dissenters
17. Undermining Civil Society: Weakening independent organizations and institutions that could challenge the regime's authority.
18. Criminalization of Opposition: Labeling political opponents as criminals, terrorists, or enemies of the state.
19. Religious Manipulation: Exploiting religious beliefs and institutions to legitimize the regime's authority, justify policies, and suppress opposition.

This can involve:

• Religious Nationalism: Promoting a specific religion or religious identity as central to the national identity, often marginalizing other religions or secular viewpoints.
• Clerical Alliances: Forming alliances with religious leaders to gain their support and influence over the population.
• Divine Justification: Claiming divine right or support for the regime’s actions and leadership.
• Suppressing Religious Dissent: Persecuting religious groups or individuals who oppose the regime.
• Legislating Morality: Enforcing laws based on religious doctrines to control personal behavior and societal norms.
• Religious Propaganda: Using religious rhetoric and symbols in state propaganda to invoke a sense of moral righteousness and loyalty.

These tactics serve to consolidate power by aligning the regime with religious authority and using it to influence or control the populace.

Now, tell yourself that you do not see how Donald Trump and his MaGA mindset are not what is described above. See what is right there laid out plain and simple before us. Reality is not fun, not easy and it can hurt. Especially when leaving a cult or cult-like group for the bright sun of reality. 

But are we children, as Trump wishes, easily led, pliable for his own purposes to suppose his narcissism, his deepest pleasures? Or for us, for ourselves, not himself?

It is the formula for an authoritarian state.

Read Timothy Snyder's "On Tyranny". 
And just try not to see Donald Trump all through it. You will fail.

But you can succeed, we all can, just by clearly seeing the "Emperor's New Clothes" of Donald Trump, have never ever existed.

He is the charlatan we can all see.

The "MaGA Mind" is not just a political stance; it represents a dangerous shift toward authoritarianism that threatens the very fabric of our democratic society. It leverages fear, binary thinking, and manipulative techniques to create a distorted view of reality, undermining the principles of our democratic constitutional federal republic.

We can keep our country but as Franklin said, it will take Effort.

Educate yourself and others, read and share, and stay informed. VET your information. Check and double-check it. Dig deep when it sounds either too good to be true, or just simply ridiculous.

Engage in our political process, vote, contact your representatives...share.

Support our Democratic institutions, join organizations, and speak up to protect our free speech before it's gone

Foster community and dialogue by building bridges and combatting disinformation.

Advocate for accountability by demanding justice and promoting transparency.

We all have a role to play. The future of our democracy depends on our collective efforts to uphold our values and principles. By staying informed, engaged, and active, we resist the slide toward authoritarianism and ensure that our government remains of the people, by the people, and for the people. The People. US. ALL of us.

Let us not be swayed by the illusions and disillusions of the "MaGA Mind." Instead, reaffirm our commitment to a just, fair, and democratic society where every voice is heard and respected.

Together, we can indeed preserve this great experiment of democracy that our founders envisioned.

Stand up. Speak out. Act now.

Certainly Vote, it's the least any of us can do. However, this time we may have to take other action if Trump's claims of subverting our electoral process play out.

Our government has to start acting now about this new, but also old threat. 

This conservative activist Republican Party has created an overbalanced activist conservative SCOTUS that is going to require a reset of some short, a correction to balance the court. Liberal and conservatives, Democrats and Republicans, need to work together and for decades Republicans have pushed for this situation hoping for, and working toward minority rule. 

I touched on this indirectly in my horror sci-fi novel, "The Unwritten", Vol. II of my Anthology of Evil series. In that universe, there is a horrendous Religious War where Science won. There was then a huge Science War where again, science won. We don't want to go through that here.

Let's...not.

But that is where we're headed if America doesn't correct these illiberal imbalances back to where both sides can once again work together

We must let them know we demand action. So that on that day of swearing in, next January 2025 of our new POTUS, America will continue on from the point of our founding over 200 years ago, rather than begin a new day of Trump-led authoritarianism. Losing our right to vote so many died to protect and not simply be left by the fascist wayside of the road once known as America.

Cheers! Sláinte!