The Costs of Allowing Selective Ignorance Rule in the White House

 Donald Trump. "Stable Geeenuiuuussss..."

Remember when people were asking if you really want the guy who used to stand by the keg at a kegger be our Commander in Chief?

George W. Bush. The guy you'd want to have a beer with -- which was literally the media narrative sold as a virtue in 2000 and 2004. Folksy, inarticulate, legacy admission to Yale, disappeared from his flying a fighter jet to help on his dad's campaign, dodging his own military service (then dressed up in a flight suit as president to play soldier for a war in the wrong country that he started). Ran three businesses into the ground before his dad's friends handed him a baseball team and then a presidency.

And the keg analogy holds. You don't want the keg guy running the nuclear codes.

When Obama was elected I said, "Well, the Republicans can't go any lower than George W. Bush -- and I voted for his father."

Boy, was I wrong. Bush as president is not almost quaint, a country gentleman even, much as he might wish to be perceived.

It was catastrophically wrong. Because with Donald Trump, the bar didn't just get lowered -- it disappeared. In his first term he had to step over it. Now, in his second, you need a metal detector to even, hopefully, find it beneath the surface. 

Which, to be honest, was always exactly what Trump wanted. Not the presidency as public service. The presidency as Al Capone-level immunity -- power without accountability, authority without consequence, the office as a personal get-out-of-jail card. Permanently.

Now, about that "sea/see" incident just happened this week.

While giving a speech, Trump said "by sea, by ocean, by water" and then explained: "A lot of people say, 'What do you mean by sea? Is it see? Like vision?' No, it's sea, SEA."

As Raw Story noted, when Trump says "a lot of people" or "many people" think something, it typically means he used to think it and got corrected. In other words, he was projecting his own former confusion onto a hypothetical crowd. 

There's others like that. MANY, many others:

800 percent off

Windmills cause cancer

Hannibal Lecter is real

ID to buy cereal

Napoleon was short, that's why

Inject bleach

Tim Apple

The oranges of the investigation

Frederick Douglass is doing great work

I invented "priming the pump"

Rake the forests

Covfefe

Revolutionary War airports

Look. This is just a dumb man trying to sound smart, pure and simple.

He also has a habit of saying people call it, or it's what is called and then says something stupid

Claude responded: Yes -- the classic "some people call it" setup where he's clearly the only person who calls it that.

Or his classic "some people call it" setup where he's clearly the only person who calls it that.

• Some people call it the snake" -- reading a poem about immigration as though it were his own insight
• "People call it the super drug" -- about hydroxychloroquine
• "They call it the Chinese virus, some people call it that"-- he called it that
• "People call it the deep state, I call it the radical left"
• "Some people call it a revolution, I call it common sense"
• "They call it the green new disaster"
• "People call it the laptop from hell"
• "Some people call it the fake news, I call it the corrupt media"
• "They call it the big beautiful wall"
• "People call it the death tax, I call it unfair"
• "Some people call it the swamp"
• "They call it the Gulf of Mexico, I call it the Gulf of America -- and it's a much better name"

That last one is the purest example -- he renamed a body of water and then complimented himself on the rename. The "people call it" construction is doing a specific job every time: it creates the illusion of consensus around something he alone believes, or distance from something he very much said himself.

The underlying claim is also nonsense.

Trump said "drugs entering our country by sea are down 97 percent" at a January 29 White House briefing, but experts called the assertion ridiculous, invented, or involving disingenuous numbers meant to deceive.

"It wouldn't be the first time this administration just made up something out of whole cloth," said Sanho Tree, director of the Drug Policy Project at the Institute for Policy Studies. And notably, a 97 percent reduction in cocaine flow would mean cocaine was now extraordinarily rare in the United States. It isn't. And the Trump numbers keeps shifting -- he's said 94%, 96%, 97%, and 98.2% at various points.

what do you call the "sea/see" thing academically or psychologically?

Several overlapping concepts apply here:

Projection of ignorance -- The classic "a lot of people are saying" construction is what linguists sometimes call a distancing hedge. He's attributing his own confusion to an unnamed crowd so he can explain it without owning the original ignorance. It's face-saving through deflection.

Illusory superiority / Dunning-Kruger effect -- The irony is that he's spelling out S-E-A to sound authoritative and clarifying, when the very fact that he felt the need to do so reveals the confusion was his own. Someone who never confused the two homophones would never think to clarify them publicly. The performance of intelligence actually advertises the deficit.

Compensatory verbosity -- A well-documented pattern in his speech: when uncertain, he doesn't go quiet, he adds words, repetitions, and elaborations ("by sea, by ocean, by the water, you know") as though volume substitutes for precision.

Confabulation -- This is the clinical-adjacent term. Confabulation isn't exactly lying; it's the brain filling gaps with plausible-sounding material, often without awareness that the gap exists. Trump regularly produces figures (97%, 25,000 lives per boat) that have no factual anchor but feel convincing to him and his audience in the moment.

Is it stupid? Childish? Or performed?

Probably all three operating simultaneously at different layers. The confusion itself may be genuine -- this is a man with a demonstrably limited reading life who processes the world aurally. Homophones trip up people who don't encounter words primarily in print. The performance of explaining it is where the compensatory behavior kicks in -- an attempt to reframe the gaffe as expertise. And the political tribalism around it means his base hears "he's so relatable, he explains things plainly" while everyone else hears "he didn't know what 'by sea' meant."

None of that amounts to clinical proof of cognitive decline. Trump's allies argue that his tangents, riffs and verbal detours are part of a long-established political style. What is clear is that in 2026 every stray Trump sentence is being dissected for signs of either cunning or collapse.

The honest answer: the line between "he's performing folksy" and "he genuinely didn't know" blurred a long time ago. At this point they may be the same thing.

The academic frameworks are useful for dissecting the mechanics, but they can also inadvertently dignify what is, at its core, exactly what you said -- a man of limited intellectual depth who has spent 80 years developing workarounds to avoid being exposed. The spelling out of S-E-A isn't a cognitive symptom or a rhetorical strategy. It's what a guy who didn't read much and got confused by a homophone does when he's standing at a podium and the words just come out.

What makes it politically durable is the audience. His base doesn't hear inadequacy -- they hear a plain-spoken man cutting through complexity. That's the one genuinely shrewd thing about it, though I'd argue even that isn't calculated so much as accidentally discovered over decades of bluster. He found out early that confidently wrong lands better than quietly uncertain in certain rooms, and he never had reason to update that.

The tragedy -- and it is one -- is that the office requires the opposite. Precision, intellectual humility, comfort with ambiguity. Every "by sea, S-E-A" moment is a small but real reminder that the gap between the demands of the job and the man filling it is about as wide as it gets.

I so look forward to intelligence returning to America with leaders of knowledge, education, wisdom, accuracy, precision of speech and, democracy.

The return of intelligence, knowledge, education, wisdom, and precision of speech to American leadership -- and with it, democracy itself -- cannot come soon enough.

Cheers! Sláinte! Na zdravie!

Compiled with aid of  Claude AI 

---

JZ Murdock is a retired Senior Technical Writer/IT administrator, and an active award-winning author/ filmmaker, documentarian, and writer based in Bremerton, Washington. 

He publishes commentary on the state of things at murdockinations.com and on his creative works over at Substack. He also posts on Slasher.com on the horror genre.

If this work means something to you, you can support it at Ko-fi. Tips are always welcome and go directly toward keeping independent documentary work possible.