The treaty proclaimed "Tibetans shall be happy in Tibet, and Chinese in China. Both shall not intrude into other's territory."
The Lhasa pillar still stands.
In October 1950, China invaded again breaking the pact, most significantly, when 40,000 Chinese troops invaded Tibet, the event the Tibetan government-in-exile and most Western sources refer to as the Chinese invasion/annexation of Tibet.
No new treaty. No renegotiation. Just violation.
Since then: forced sterilization campaigns targeting Tibetan women.
Mass Han in-migration reshaping the demographics of Lhasa and other Tibetan cities.
Tibetan children removed into state boarding schools designed to erase language and culture.
Genocide by birthrate of foreign national invaders.
1,129 years of a written commitment, broken in a season, followed by 75 years of dismantling the people the treaty was meant to protect.
The documented drivers of the original invasion were more plural:
securing a strategic buffer against India,
asserting PRC sovereignty over former Qing/Republican-era territorial claims, and
ideological consolidation of the "five races" into one state.
China's stated reason: humanitarian rescue. Backward, primitive Tibetans, in need of liberation from feudalism.
What "liberation" actually offered:
no referendum,
no aid freely given,
no autonomy preserved.
Just 40,000 troops, then Han settlement, then dispossession.
What it delivered instead, over seven decades:
mineral and timber extraction,
hydropower projects for mainland China, mostly
and
water diversion on Tibetan rivers,
resources flowing outward while Tibetans were displaced.
Humanitarian concern doesn't require an army.
It doesn't require replacing the population you claim to be rescuing.
The water and power stay in China's system, the fiscal and construction benefits are structured in ways that reinforce settlement patterns, and the same infrastructure doubles as military hardening on a contested border. That's mechanism-first and doesn't require one to assert intent—the design speaks for itself.
Abuse of another country you claim as your own for your own country’s benefit, regardless the harm you inflict, or the demands you impose.
Sounds a lot like Russia’s intent in Ukraine, and elsewhere.
Different border, different decade, different cover story. Same mechanism: claim the land as always yours, extract what's underneath it, replace who's on top of it, call it help.
Tibet got a UN resolution and silence.
Ukraine got a coalition.
The mechanism didn't change. The world's willingness to name it did.
We, as a planet—kind of suck.
Cheers! Sláinte! Na zdravie!
No comments:
Post a Comment