Showing posts with label denial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label denial. Show all posts

Thursday, September 11, 2025

Timeline: Heather Cox Richardson and the Roots of Today’s Political Crisis

I posted this yesterday. I gave it to some, directly. But it seems to be too much for some to read an article and this is stunning information, it is important details about how we got this nightmare Trump/MaGA government today. 

Maybe, just maybe this will help, but it's only the surface. I highly recommend reading Heather Cox Richardson's Letters From An American on Substack, where I also reside now.

This is her piece on Substack that is similar to the podcast that got me all fired up on this. “History exposes MaGA: a movement built on denial, not precedent.” - August 20, 2025 - by Heather Cox Richardson

This is the Pod Save America episode that amazed me so much, she doesn't really get going on what I'm concerned with here until about seventeen or so minutes in: Heather Cox Richardson on Donald Trump, MaGA and How We Fight Back. I get it for some, Pod Save America and Crooked Media are pretty liberal, too liberal for some. But everyone should hear this episode and just skip to wherever she is talking. Honestly, deal with it just listen to the entire thing, it's not THAT long and not that liberal orientated as the usual Pod Save America podcasts. 

Someone else I should give a shoutout to on Substack (there's a few, but for now...) Mary Geddry. 


This is what 9/11 should always mean to us: honoring the lives lost, the courage of first responders, and the resilience of families forever changed. It was a moment when Americans of every background stood together, however briefly, in grief and resolve.

But what makes the lies and distortions from Trump and MaGA...so desperate for power they embraced QAnon fantasies to prop up their cause...so corrosive is how completely they betray this spirit. Instead of unity, they spread denial. Instead of truth, they invent enemies. And instead of learning from history, they weaponize it for power...dragging down our Constitution, our freedoms, and America’s reputation with them.

Trump himself spread falsehoods about 9/11:

  • He claimed “thousands in New Jersey cheered” as the towers fell — no evidence supports this.

  • He claimed he “predicted 9/11” in his 2000 book — he did not.

  • He claimed he sent “200 workers to Ground Zero” — no proof this ever happened.

These weren’t slips of memory; they were part of a pattern. Deny facts. Inflate the self. Invent enemies. MaGA has built its politics on this same foundation of lies and grievance, and that is the ultimate insult to the memory of 9/11.

Anyway, in the hope this might make someone read her piece or listen to that podcast, I made a timeline to give you the idea of why this is so interesting, and important to know about. But this only scratches the surface, she will go into it all much deeper with more interrelationships. 

From Military.com: Fear and Uncertainty Followed the Sept. 11 Attacks. What Was Real and What Was a Good Headline?

The main point is that we must come back together as a nation, as a democracy, not as Trump’s toxic, hijacked GOP, but as a cohesive people grounded in truth, decency, liberty, real freedom, and conscience, as our Founding Fathers actually intended.

How MaGA Was Allowed to Fester: A Timeline of Denial

When Heather Cox Richardson wrote that MaGA is “a movement built on denial, not precedent,” she wasn’t talking about something born in 2016. She was pointing to a much longer arc in American history. What we’re living through today has deep roots, going back to Reconstruction and resurfacing at key moments whenever democracy expanded to include more voices.

This is the story of how that denial metastasized into the MaGA movement we know now.


Reconstruction: The Birth of Denial (1865–1870s)

After the Civil War, Black men and poor white men voted for leaders who promised schools, hospitals, prosthetics for veterans, and railroads. It was a vision of government as a tool for public good.

Former Confederates hated it. The Fifteenth Amendment (1870) prohibited racial discrimination in voting, and the Department of Justice began prosecuting the Ku Klux Klan. But elite Southerners pivoted: instead of arguing against Black rights openly, they claimed these voters were ushering in “socialism.” Building schools and hospitals, they said, meant stealing tax dollars from hardworking whites.

To counter this vision of government for all, they romanticized the cowboy — a myth of rugged independence and racial dominance that conveniently ignored how much the West relied on federal aid.


The Liberal Consensus and Its Enemies (1930s–1950s)

The Depression and World War II created a broad “liberal consensus”: government should regulate business, provide a safety net, and support global cooperation. Most Americans, including Southerners, embraced this.

But some wealthy businessmen despised it. They wanted deregulation and lower taxes, but their rhetoric didn’t take hold until civil rights cracked the consensus.


Civil Rights and the Southern Strategy (1954–1968)

Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and Eisenhower’s defense of Black students in Little Rock (1957) gave segregationists their opening. Federal protection of equal rights became “socialism.”

The cowboy myth resurfaced with Barry Goldwater in 1964, South Carolina delivering the final push for his nomination. By 1965, the Voting Rights Act protected Black and Brown voters. That gave parties a choice: court these new voters or their opponents. Nixon chose the latter. His “Southern Strategy” courted white supremacists, planting seeds of today’s Republican base.


The Culture Wars and Reagan’s “Welfare Queen” (1970s–1980s)

Facing declining popularity, Nixon demonized feminists and racial minorities. Ronald Reagan doubled down, claiming minorities and women were bankrupting the nation. His infamous “welfare queen” symbolized this attack — a fictional Black woman supposedly living large off taxpayers.

By this point, Republicans had reframed federal programs as handouts for undeserving groups, while championing tax cuts and deregulation for the wealthy.


Delegitimizing Democracy (1990s–2000s)

As women and minorities leaned Democratic, right-wing media blasted them as socialists. After the Motor Voter Act (1993), Republicans increasingly claimed Democrats relied on fraud to win elections.

In 2000, GOP operatives rioted in Florida to stop a recount that might have given Al Gore the presidency. The Supreme Court handed the victory to George W. Bush, further normalizing the idea that Republican power should be preserved at any cost.


The Obama Era and Structural Manipulation (2008–2010s)

Barack Obama’s election was a breaking point. Republicans launched Operation REDMAP (2010) to gerrymander statehouses and lock in control of Congress.

The Supreme Court’s Citizens United (2010) decision unleashed unlimited corporate money into politics. In 2013, the Court gutted the Voting Rights Act, removing key protections for minority voters.

The pattern was clear: if expanding democracy hurt Republican power, the solution was not persuasion but suppression.


Trump and “Stop the Steal” (2016–2020)

Donald Trump built his brand on delegitimizing elections. Even before 2016, Roger Stone launched a “Stop the Steal” website. A judge had to stop him from intimidating voters.

When Trump lost in 2020, he weaponized that rhetoric into an assault on democracy itself. Fox News hosts admitted privately the fraud claims were false, but pushed them anyway — because outrage meant ratings.


MaGA Today: Confederacy Rebranded (2020s–2025)

In just forty years, Republicans moved from disagreeing with Democratic policies to declaring Democrats illegitimate, to rigging elections, and finally to openly attacking democracy itself.

Gerrymandered maps now guarantee white minority rule in places like Texas, where it takes 445,000 white voters to elect a member of Congress, but 1.4 million Latino or 2 million Black voters to achieve the same.

Trump’s message — that history overstates slavery’s horrors, and that women and minorities must be pushed from the public sphere — is the same argument Confederates made to defend oligarchy over democracy. MaGA is simply the latest mask.


Closing Reflection

MaGA did not appear out of thin air. It is the culmination of more than 150 years of backlash against the idea of multiracial democracy. Each time America expanded its promise of equality, reactionaries branded it “socialism,” resurrected the myth of rugged white individualism, and worked to suppress the voices of those who demanded more.

History shows us this movement isn’t precedent. It’s denial. And denial, left unchecked, has a way of festering into something that threatens the very core of democracy.

Charlie Kirk’s murder does not make him a martyr—despite President Trump’s attempt to sanctify him with talk of a posthumous Medal of Freedom, a travesty for both America and democracy. Nor does it erase the toxic role he played in elevating Trump’s brand of anti-democratic denial into the mainstream. Like Trump, Kirk thrived on division, grievance, and the embrace of authoritarian myths that corrode the very foundations of our republic.

To watch Republicans now twist his death into an indictment of liberals for daring to name fascism for what it is is to see, again, the very denial Heather Cox Richardson warns us about: a refusal to confront the movement’s own legacy of extremism. If America is to pull itself forward, it won’t be by sanctifying those who helped drag us into this nightmare, but by facing the history, understanding how denial metastasized into MaGA, and recommitting to the democratic promise Kirk and his allies worked so hard to undermine.

Cheers! Sláinte! Na zdravie!

Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Monday, September 8, 2025

Watching History Repeat: Nazis, Trump, and the MaGA Comfort of Denial

One of the stranger experiences of our time is turning on a historical documentary and realizing you’re also watching today’s news unfold. Netflix’s recent series, Hitler and the Nazis: Evil on Trial, tells the story of how Germany’s democracy collapsed from within—not in a sudden coup, but step by step. 

Let's start with this rather amazing piece: 

“History exposes MAGA: a movement built on denial, not precedent.” - August 20, 2025 - by Heather Cox Richardson. Or, you can listen to her talking about this on the Pod Save America podcast episode - Heather Cox Richardson on Donald Trump, MAGA and How We Fight Back. This is important history and fascinating stuff we've not heard of before, put into context and it's disturbing. Very much so.

Through propaganda, scapegoating, power grabs, and violence disguised as patriotism, a modern society slid into dictatorship. Director Berlinger has said he intended for the series to be a message to younger viewers and a warning that "normal people can do horrific things".

I put this doc on and was surprised, but not really, to feel I was watching the news today, in America, under Donald Trump's "administration" as yet again, a second failed attempt at being POTUS, or a complete lack of effort thereof. 

Trump's not even trying hard to be an autocrat as just as Hitler was, he's lazy. He uses mob boss mentality of "yesmen" around him to pick up his intent and run with it to please what they think he wants, fearing being put out of his realm of influence, offering ever more plausible deniability and potential atrocities.

It makes more understandable just how things got so out of control under Hitler. No, Trump is NOT Hitler, likely never will, or can be in today's America, today's world. But they thought that back in the 1930s, in Hitler's rise to power.

As I watched, the déjà vu was chilling. The echoes of today’s MaGA movement and the Trump administration were unmistakable. The cult of personality, the disinformation, the rewriting of reality until truth itself no longer mattered—it all felt eerily current. I posted widely suggesting that MaGA supporters watch the series and tell me, honestly, that they don’t see the parallels.

But of course, they’ll find ways not to. That’s the real problem—when people can no longer see reality because they’re looking through a mental lens handed to them by those who don’t want to be seen clearly. They ignore history, and they ignore the present they are immersed in. If they could stand back and see themselves in the sweep of history and culture, they’d be horrified at their place in it.

For decades now, they’ve poured their frustrations into vilifying an “Other”—liberals, progressives, Democrats, “libtards.” Just as has happened in every pre-genocide atrocity, the first step is always dehumanization. Yet they remain blind to the fact that in doing so, they are revealing exactly who and what they have become. It's interesting. MaGA watches this series and rejects it because they cannot see what is happening all around us today with THEIR Trump administration. No, I'm serious.

A Case Study in Denial

If you think I’m overstating how predictable these rationalizations are, just look at how one MaGA-leaning reviewer described Hitler and the Nazis: Evil on Trial:

POLITICAL PROPAGANDA COWARDLY DISGUISED AS A HISTORICAL DOCUMENTARY! I wanted to get away from all the political debacle and tension all over my social media, as after a while it can make your head spin. So I opened up Netflix and I see they have added a new documentary about Hitler and the Nazi’s, I thought to myself “you know what, enough of this Democrat vs Republican, Trump vs Biden, let’s just turn on something historically educational, and see if there’s anything interesting I can learn from this series”, so I start watching… as I’m watching, I start to hear slight remark's and comment's from these “historians”, who start to weave a narrative, attempting to draw similar political circumstances from those times, and reference it to the climate of America today. I let it go in the first episode, and also the second episode. As soon as I got to the third episode I couldn’t believe what I was really watching, it turned into a lecture for us Americans about which party we should vote for ! to even make the comparison of Hitler’s retreat to the Mar a Lago?? I turned it off right at that point. Isn’t it ironic that the same propaganda and fear monger tactics that the documentary tries to educate us about, are the EXACT SAME tactics they used in the VERY SAME series. Thank you DEMOCRATS for RUINING what could’ve been a great show !! AS YOU DO WITH EVERY MOVIE AND SHOW YOU TOUCH.

By the way, the IMDb rating is 7.7.

Now, another perspective:

As a retired historian of modern America who also taught World War II for many years, I have seen dozens of documentaries on the period. This is by far the best. Expertly filmed, the series deftly weaves historical footage with William Shirer's writings and voice (helped by AI--the best application of AI I have ever seen), accounts of the Nuremberg Trials, and is greatly enhanced by the insightful analyses of a number of authoritative historians. Perhaps its strongest feature is the thing that apparently annoys a number of poor reviewers here: the series makes clear that authoritarianism, as Upton Sinclair (and Shirer, among many other prophetic voices) warned, *CAN * happen here. The series makes clear * why this history MATTERS to us today*. It is exceedingly well grounded in the facts and evidence and makes the point again and again of the echoes of history into our own time of frightening rising authoritarianism--in Europe and here in the United States. I cannot recommend it any more highly.

One moment in Hitler and the Nazis: Evil on Trial struck me in particular. Journalist William L. Shirer, who lived and reported from Nazi Germany, remarked that the German people seemed so enraptured by Hitler that “he could say the most ridiculous things, and they would simply agree.”

That observation is as chilling today as it was then. The measure of a demagogue isn’t the brilliance of what they say, but the blind devotion they command. The more absurd the claim, the more loyalty is proven by agreeing to it. When facts no longer matter and allegiance to the leader becomes the highest truth, democracy is already in mortal danger.

How are we not seeing that today with MaGA and their Donald Trump. I mean, with Donald Trump, and HIS MaGA, His GOP?


How MaGA Rationalizes Away the Parallels

When confronted with the similarities, Trump loyalists often reach for familiar defenses:

  • Minimization: “It’s not the same. Nazis killed millions, Trump hasn’t done that.” As if the only valid comparison is genocide, while ignoring the early stages—the corrosion of norms and institutions—that we are living through right now.

  • Deflection: “The real fascists are Democrats.” By turning the accusation around, they avoid having to examine their own movement.

  • Exceptionalism: “This is America—it can’t happen here.” As though geography or patriotism protects us from history.

  • Conspiracy Thinking: “That documentary is liberal propaganda.” Any fact that threatens the narrative is branded “fake.”

  • Idol Defense: “He’s just showing strength. Finally someone is fighting for us.” Authoritarian behavior is reframed as heroic leadership.

  • Cognitive Dissonance Avoidance: For many, it’s too painful to admit they’ve been misled. Easier to mock the comparison as “hysterical” than face reality.


Why Those Rationalizations Collapse

  • Saying “It’s not the same” is willful blindness. History doesn’t repeat as a carbon copy—it rhymes. The warning isn’t that Trump is Hitler, but that authoritarianism follows recognizable steps.

  • “The left are the real fascists” is projection. Protest, accountability, and free speech are features of democracy, not signs of tyranny.

  • “It can’t happen here” ignores that Germans once thought the same about their modern, cultured republic. It did happen there.

  • Branding history as propaganda is the clearest proof of indoctrination. If truth itself can be dismissed, authoritarianism has already taken root.

  • Calling cruelty “strength” and corruption “patriotism” may feel powerful for a moment, but it only disempowers citizens in the long run.

  • Denial doesn’t stop the march of events—it accelerates them. Pretending the parallels don’t exist only buys time for authoritarianism to harden.


The Takeaway

Hitler and the Nazis: Evil on Trial  isn’t just a historical documentary—it’s a mirror. When MaGA insists they can’t see themselves in the reflection, it’s not because the image is unclear. It’s because they’d rather close their eyes.

The question isn’t whether the parallels exist. They do. The question is whether enough of us are willing to recognize them before it’s too late.


Cheers! Sláinte! Na zdravie!


Compiled with aid of ChatGPT

Wednesday, August 6, 2025

The Art of Never Apologizing: Trump’s Doctrine of Doubling Down

There’s an unspoken rule in Donald Trump’s world—and it’s been carried into his second term: Never admit a mistake. Never apologize. Never back down. If something goes wrong, blame someone else. If that fails, double down.

This mindset has become a defining feature of Trumpism and his administration’s operating procedure. While political leaders in most democracies are expected to take responsibility and adjust course when mistakes are made, Trump’s White House functions more like a fortress of deflection—where denial is policy and accountability is weakness.

But let’s put this to the test. What has Trump or his administration actually admitted to getting wrong since taking office again in 2025?

A Short, Quiet List of Admissions

1. Trump Admits He Was Wrong About Putin

In a rare moment of self-awareness on a podcast in July 2025, Trump admitted he was wrong to trust Vladimir Putin and not initially support arming Ukraine. It was vague and veiled, but for Trump, it was close to a full confession.

2. ICE Acknowledges Deportation Error

In May 2025, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) admitted in court that it had misrepresented statements made by a Guatemalan man facing deportation. A similar administrative error occurred earlier in April involving a man illegally deported to El Salvador despite legal protections.

That’s about it.

The Long List of What They Should Have Admitted

Here’s a small sample of things the Trump administration should have taken responsibility for:

  • Pete Hegseth’s Signal Breach: Sharing classified Yemen bombing recommendations over an unsecured messaging app based on a SECRET/NOFORN email. No admission. No consequences.

  • January 6 Legacy: Still framed as patriotic, with zero acknowledgment of the administration’s incitement or inaction that day.

  • Project 2025 Endorsements: While distancing from the name, Trump has parroted many of its policies. No transparency, just semantic dodging.

  • Epstein Files Obstruction: Despite evidence of proximity and presence, the administration has stonewalled Congressional efforts to release files.

  • Judicial Loyalty Appointments: Some of the judges pushed through have been overturned, investigated, or censured—yet still no reflection or correction.

  • Inflation and Economic Fallout: Trump blames Biden-era ghosts for price hikes, ignoring how instability from his own policies—tariffs, deregulation, and personnel purges—fuels uncertainty and investor anxiety.

  • Border Deaths and Abuse: Despite escalating humanitarian crises under renewed hardline policies, there’s no acknowledgment of systemic failings—only scapegoats and theatrics.

Comparison Table

CategoryAdmitted?Should Have Admitted
Hegseth’s Signal breach❌✅
Putin/Ukraine miscalculation✅ (partial)✅
Epstein cover-up❌✅
Judicial overreach❌✅
Project 2025 ambitions❌✅
January 6 incitement❌✅
Economic instability❌✅
Deportation abuses✅ (ICE only)✅


Why It Matters

When an administration refuses to admit error, it prevents learning. It blocks reform. It replaces transparency with paranoia and weaponizes loyalty over competence. America becomes not just a nation that makes mistakes—but one that insists on making them again, louder.

This unyielding posture may excite a segment of voters who see apology as weakness, but for the country, it’s a slow erosion of democratic integrity. Trust dies not in the thunder of scandal, but in the silence where accountability should live.



Complied with aid of ChatGPT